Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-08T16:23:45.865Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Assessing bilingual language switching behavior with Ecological Momentary Assessment

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 April 2019

Jussi Jylkkä ,
Anna Soveri ,
Matti Laine  and
Minna Lehtonen
Jussi Jylkkä*
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Abo Akademi University, Finland
Anna Soveri
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Abo Akademi University, Finland
Matti Laine
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Abo Akademi University, Finland Turku Brain and Mind Center, University of Turku, Finland
Minna Lehtonen
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Abo Akademi University, Finland Department of Psychology and Logopedics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Helsinki, Finland MultiLing Center for Multilingualism in Society across the Lifespan, Department of Linguistics and Scandinavian studies, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
*
Address for correspondence: Jussi Jylkkä, E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The putative bilingual executive advantage has been argued to stem from lifelong experience with executively demanding language behaviors, such as switching between the two languages. However, studies testing for possible associations between language switching frequency and EF in bilinguals have yielded inconsistent results. One reason for this could lie in the methods used that have evaluated the frequency and type of language switches with retrospective self-reports, as well as in problems in reliability and convergent validity of the executive tasks. By using Ecological Momentary Assessment (EMA) as a reference point for self-reports of language switches, we examined the validity of general retrospective self-reports of language switching. Additionally, we examined associations between language switching and EF using multilevel models. Our results indicated that the commonly used retrospective self-reports of language switching may lack convergent validity. However, we found tentative evidence that contextual language switches, assessed with EMA, may be associated with better inhibitory control, set shifting, and working memory.

Keywords

bilingual executive advantagelanguage switching frequencyexecutive functionsEcological Momentary Assessmentlinear mixed effects modelmultilevel modeling
Type
Research Article
Information
Bilingualism: Language and Cognition , Volume 23 , Issue 2 , March 2020 , pp. 309 - 322
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bialystok, E (2009) Bilingualism: The good, the bad, and the indifferent. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 12(1), 3–11. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728908003477CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Botvinick, MM, Braver, TS, Barch, DM, Carter, CS and Cohen, JD (2001) Conflict monitoring and cognitive control. Psychological Review 108(3), 624–52. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11488380CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Carlson, S, Martinkauppi, S, Rämä, P, Salli, E, Korvenoja, A and Aronen, HJ (1998) Distribution of cortical activation during visuospatial n-back tasks as revealed by functional magnetic resonance imaging. Cerebral Cortex 8(8), 743–752. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/8.8.743CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cohen, J (1988) Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
de Bruin, A, Treccani, B and Della Sala, S (2015) Cognitive advantage in bilingualism: An example of publication bias? Psychological Science 26(1), 99–107. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797614557866CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dolcos, F and Cabeza, R (2002) Event-related potentials of emotional memory: Encoding pleasant, unpleasant, and neutral pictures. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience 2(3), 252–263. https://doi.org/10.3758/CABN.2.3.252CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eriksen, BA and Eriksen, CW (1974) Effects of noise letters upon the identification of a target letter in a nonsearch task. Perception & Psychophysics 16(1), 143–149. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03203267CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gratton, G, Coles, MG and Donchin, E (1992) Optimizing the use of information: strategic control of activation of responses. Journal of Experimental Psychology. General 121(4), 480–506. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1431740CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Green, DW and Abutalebi, J (2013) Language control in bilinguals: The adaptive control hypothesis. Journal of Cognitive Psychology 25(5), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/20445911.2013.796377CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hartanto, A and Yang, H (2016) Disparate bilingual experiences modulate task-switching advantages: A diffusion-model analysis of the effects of interactional context on switch costs. Cognition 150, 10–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2016.01.016CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Homma, Y, Ando, T, Yoshida, M, Kageyama, S, Takei, M, Kimoto, K, Ishizuka, O, Gotoh, M and Hashimoto, T (2002) Voiding and incontinence frequencies: Variability of diary data and required diary length. Neurourology and Urodynamics 21(3), 204–209. https://doi.org/10.1002/nau.10016CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jeffreys, H (1961) Theory of Probability (3rd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Johnson, HA, Sawi, O and Paap, KR (2015) Language switching frequency in bilinguals is inconsistently linked to executive functioning. In Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Neuroscience Society.Google Scholar
Jylkkä, J (2017) Bilingual Language Switching and Executive Functions. Åbo Akademi. Retrieved from http://www.doria.fi/bitstream/handle/10024/147587/jylkka_jussi.pdf?sequence=2Google Scholar
Jylkkä, J, Lehtonen, M, Lindholm, F, Kuusakoski, A and Laine, M (2018) The relationship between general executive functions and bilingual switching and monitoring in language production. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 21(3). https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728917000104Google Scholar
Jylkkä, J, Soveri, A, Wahlström, J, Lehtonen, M, Rodríguez-Fornells, A and Laine, M (2017) Relationship between language switching experience and executive functions in bilinguals: An Internet-based study. Journal of Cognitive Psychology 29(4), 404–419. https://doi.org/10.1080/20445911.2017.1282489CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kerns, JG (2006) Anterior cingulate and prefrontal cortex activity in an FMRI study of trial-to-trial adjustments on the Simon task. NeuroImage 33(1), 399–405. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.06.012CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laine, M and Lehtonen, M (2018) Cognitive consequences of bilingualism: where to go from here? Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1080/23273798.2018.1462498Google Scholar
Lehtonen, M, Soveri, A, Laine, A, Järvenpää, J, de Bruin, A and Antfolk, J (2018) Is bilingualism associated with enhanced executive functioning in adults? A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin 144(4), 394–425.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lexell, JE and Downham, DY (2005) How to assess the reliability of measurements in rehabilitation. American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation 84(9), 719–723. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.phm.0000176452.17771.20CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Linck, JA, Schwieter, JW and Sunderman, G (2012) Inhibitory control predicts language switching performance in trilingual speech production. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 15(03), 651–662. https://doi.org/doi:10.1017/S136672891100054XCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luce, KH and Crowther, JH (1999) The reliability of the Eating Disorder Examination-Self-Report Questionnaire version (EDE-Q). The International Journal of Eating Disorders 25(3), 349–351. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/101920023.0.CO;2-M>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nee, DE, Wager, TD and Jonides, J (2007) Interference resolution: insights from a meta-analysis of neuroimaging tasks. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience 7(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.3758/CABN.7.1.1CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Paap, KR and Greenberg, ZI (2013) There is no coherent evidence for a bilingual advantage in executive processing. Cognitive Psychology 66(2), 232–258. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogpsych.2012.12.002CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Paap, KR, Johnson, HA and Sawi, O (2016) Should the search for bilingual advantages in executive functioning continue? Cortex 74(February 2016), 305–314. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2015.09.010CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Paap, KR, Myuz, HA, Anders, RT, Bockelman, MF, Mikulinsky, R and Sawi, OM (2017) No compelling evidence for a bilingual advantage in switching or that frequent language switching reduces switch cost. Journal of Cognitive Psychology 29(2), 89–112. https://doi.org/10.1080/20445911.2016.1248436CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paap, KR and Sawi, O (2014) Bilingual advantages in executive functioning: Problems in convergent validity, discriminant validity, and the identification of the theoretical constructs. Frontiers in Psychology 5(962), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00962CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Podsakoff, PM, MacKenzie, SB, Lee, J-Y and Podsakoff, NP (2003) Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. The Journal of Applied Psychology 88(5), 879–903. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Prior, A and Gollan, TH (2011) Good language-switchers are good task-switchers: Evidence from Spanish–English and Mandarin–English bilinguals. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society 17(4), 682–691. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1355617711000580CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reinert, DF and Allen, JP (2002) The Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT): A review of recent research. Alcoholism, Clinical and Experimental Research 26(2), 272–279. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11964568CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rodriguez-Fornells, A, De Diego Balaguer, R and Münte, TF (2006) Executive control in bilingual language processing. Language Learning 56(s1), 133–190. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2006.00359.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rodriguez-Fornells, A, Krämer, UM, Lorenzo-Seva, U, Festman, J and Münte, TF (2012) Self-assessment of individual differences in language switching. Frontiers in Psychology 3(388), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00388Google Scholar
Rogers, RD and Monsell, S (1995) Costs of a predictible switch between simple cognitive tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 124(2), 207–231. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.124.2.207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sallis, JF and Saelens, BE (2000) Assessment of physical activity by self-report: Status, limitations, and future directions. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport 71(2), 1–14. Retrieved from http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/02701367.2000.11082780CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shiffman, S, Stone, AA and Hufford, MR (2008) Ecological Momentary Assessment. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology 4, 1–32. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-1005-9_947CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shrier, LA, Shih, M.-C. and Beardslee, WR (2005) Affect and sexual behavior in adolescents: A review of the literature and comparison of momentary sampling with diary and retrospective self-report methods of measurement. Pediatrics 115(5), 573–581. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2004-2073CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Siemann, J, Herrmann, M and Galashan, D (2018) The effect of feature-based attention on flanker interference processing: An fMRI-constrained source analysis. Scientific Reports 8(1), 1580. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-20049-1CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Simon, JR and Rudell, AP (1967) Auditory S-R compatibility: The effect of an irrelevant cue on information processing. The Journal of Applied Psychology 51(3), 300–304. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/6045637CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Soveri, A, Lehtonen, M, Karlsson, LC, Lukasik, K, Antfolk, J and Laine, M (2016) Test–retest reliability of five frequently used executive tasks in healthy adults. Applied Neuropsychology: Adult 0(0), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1080/23279095.2016.1263795Google ScholarPubMed
Soveri, A, Rodriguez-Fornells, A and Laine, M (2011) Is there a relationship between language switching and executive functions in bilingualism? Introducing a within-group analysis approach. Frontiers in Psychology 2(183), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00183CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strauss, E, Sherman, EMS and Spreen, O (2006) A Compendium of Neuropsychological Tests: Administration, Norms, and Commentary. Oxford: Oxford UP.Google Scholar
Vaz, S, Falkmer, T, Passmore, AE, Parsons, R and Andreou, P (2013) The case for using the repeatability coefficient when calculating test–retest reliability. PLoS ONE 8(9), e73990. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0073990CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Verreyt, N, Woumans, E, Vandelanotte, D, Szmalec, A and Duyck, W (2016) The influence of language-switching experience on the bilingual executive control advantage. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 19(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728914000352CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wonderlich, JA, Lavender, JM, Wonderlich, SA, Peterson, CB, Crow, SJ, Engel, SG, Le Grange, D, Mitchell, JE and Crosby, RD (2015) Examining convergence of retrospective and ecological momentary assessment measures of negative affect and eating disorder behaviors. The International Journal of Eating Disorders 48(3), 305–311. https://doi.org/10.1002/eat.22352CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yim, O and Bialystok, E (2012) Degree of conversational code-switching enhances verbal task switching in Cantonese–English bilinguals. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 15(04), 873–883. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728912000478CrossRefGoogle Scholar