Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T02:06:49.197Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Successive bilingualism and executive functions: The effect of second language use on inhibitory control in a behavioural Stroop Colour Word task*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 November 2013

KARIN HEIDLMAYR ,
SYLVAIN MOUTIER ,
BARBARA HEMFORTH ,
CYRIL COURTIN† ,
ROBERT TANZMEISTER  and
FRÉDÉRIC ISEL
KARIN HEIDLMAYR
Affiliation:
Institute of Psychology, Sorbonne Paris Cité – Paris Descartes University, France & Institute for Romance Studies, University of Vienna, Austria
SYLVAIN MOUTIER
Affiliation:
Developmental and Neurofunctional Imaging Group – GINDEV UMR 6232, CNRS, Sorbonne Paris Cité – Paris Descartes University, France
BARBARA HEMFORTH
Affiliation:
Laboratoire de Linguistique Formelle, UMR 7110, CNRS, Paris Diderot University, France & Laboratoire d'Excellence EFL, Sorbonne Paris Cité, France
CYRIL COURTIN†
Affiliation:
Developmental and Neurofunctional Imaging Group – GINDEV UMR 6232, CNRS, Sorbonne Paris Cité – Paris Descartes University, France
ROBERT TANZMEISTER
Affiliation:
Institute for Romance Studies, University of Vienna, Austria
FRÉDÉRIC ISEL*
Affiliation:
Institute of Psychology, Sorbonne Paris Cité – Paris Descartes University, France & Laboratoire d'Excellence EFL, Sorbonne Paris Cité, France
*
Address for correspondence: Frédéric Isel, PRES Sorbonne Paris Cité, IUPDP, Paris Descartes University, Institute of Psychology, Paris, France[email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Here we examined the role of bilingualism on cognitive inhibition using the Stroop Colour Word task. Our hypothesis was that the frequency of use of a second language (L2) in the daily life of successive bilingual individuals impacts the efficiency of their inhibitory control mechanism. Thirty-three highly proficient successive French–German bilinguals, living either in a French or in a German linguistic environment, performed a Stroop task on both French and German words. Moreover, 31 French monolingual individuals were also tested with French words. We showed that the bilingual advantage was (i) reinforced by the use of a third language, and (ii) modulated by the duration of immersion in a second language environment. This suggests that top–down inhibitory control is most involved at the beginning of immersion. Taken together, the present findings lend support to the psycholinguistic models of bilingual language processing that postulate that top–down active inhibition is involved in language control.

Keywords

executive functionsactive inhibitionbilingual language processingfrequency of second language useStroop interference
Type
Research Article
Information
Bilingualism: Language and Cognition , Volume 17 , Issue 3 , July 2014 , pp. 630 - 645
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

This research was supported by a grant from the University of Vienna awarded to Karin Heidlmayr and by a grant from Paris Descartes University (Projet de Recherches Collaboratives 2010–2011, Paris Descartes University) to Frédéric Isel and has been partially funded by the Labex EFL (ANR/CGI). Earlier reports on this research were presented at the Donostia Workshop on Neurobilingualism (Donostia-San Sebastian, Spain, September 30 – October 2, 2010) and at the conference Bilingual and Multilingual Interaction (Bangor, UK, March 30 – April 1, 2012). We would like to thank Judith F. Kroll for valuable discussions and for her review, as well as to two anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments on earlier versions of this manuscript. We are also grateful to Karine Doré-Mazars and Lisa Rosenfelt for fruitful comments. We are sad to note that our co-author Cyril Courtin passed away before the publication of the paper.

References

Abutalebi, J., Della Rosa, P. A., Green, D. W., Hernandez, M., Scifo, P., Keim, R., Cappa, S. F., & Costa, A. (2012). Bilingualism tunes the anterior cingulate cortex for conflict monitoring. Cerebral Cortex, 22, 2076–2086.Google Scholar
Abutalebi, J., & Green, D. W. (2008). Control mechanisms in bilingual language production: Neural evidence from language switching studies. Language and Cognitive Processes, 23, 557–582.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aron, A. R. (2007). The neural basis of inhibition in cognitive control. The Neuroscientist, 13, 214–228.Google Scholar
Badzakova-Trajkov, G. (2008). A behavioural and functional imaging investigation of Stroop task performance in late proficient bilinguals. Ph.D. thesis, The University of Auckland.Google Scholar
Badzakova-Trajkov, G., Barnett, K. J., Waldie, K. E., & Kirk, I. J. (2009). An ERP investigation of the Stroop task: The role of the cingulate in attentional allocation and conflict resolution. Brain Research, 1253, 139–148.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bahrick, H. P., Hall, L. K., Goggin, J. P., Bahrick, L. E., & Berger, S. A. (1994). Fifty years of language maintenance and language dominance in bilingual Hispanic immigrants. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 123, 264–283.Google Scholar
Best, J. R., & Miller, P. H. (2010). A developmental perspective on executive function. Child Development, 81, 1641–1660.Google Scholar
Bialystok, E. (2001). Bilingualism in development: Language, literacy, and cognition. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bialystok, E. (2005). Consequences of bilingualism on cognitive development. In Kroll & De Groot (eds.), pp. 417–432.Google Scholar
Bialystok, E. (2006). Effect of bilingualism and computer video game experience on the Simon task. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 60, 68–79.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bialystok, E. (2007). Cognitive effects of bilingualism: How linguistic experience leads to cognitive change. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 10, 210–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bialystok, E. (2010). Global–local and trail-making tasks by monolingual and bilingual children: Beyond inhibition. Developmental Psychology, 46, 93–105. doi:10.1037/a0015466 Google Scholar
Bialystok, E., Craik, F. I. M., Klein, R., & Viswanathan, M. (2004). Bilingualism, aging, and cognitive control: Evidence from the Simon task. Psychology and Aging, 19, 290–303.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bialystok, E., Craik, F. I. M., & Luk, G. (2008). Cognitive control and lexical access in younger and older bilinguals. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 34, 859–873.Google ScholarPubMed
Bialystok, E., Craik, F. I. M., & Ryan, J. (2006). Executive control in a modified Antisaccade task: Effects of aging and bilingualism. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 32, 1341–1354.Google Scholar
Bialystok, E., & DePape, A.-M. (2009). Musical expertise, bilingualism, and executive functioning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 35, 565–574.Google ScholarPubMed
Bialystok, E., & Martin, M. M. (2004). Attention and inhibition in bilingual children: Evidence from the dimensional change card sort task. Developmental Science, 7, 325–339.Google Scholar
Bjorklund, D. F., & Harnishfeger, K. K., (1995). The evolution of inhibition mechanisms and their role in human cognition and behavior. In Dempster, F. N. & Brainerd, C. J. (eds.), Interference and inhibition in cognition, pp. 141–173. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Blais, C., & Bunge, S. (2010). Behavioral and neural evidence for item-specific performance monitoring. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 22, 2758–2767.Google Scholar
Bruchmann, M., Herper, K., Konrad, C., Pantev, C., & Huster, R. J. (2010). Individualized EEG source reconstruction of Stroop interference with masked color words. NeuroImage, 49, 1800–1809.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brysbaert, M. (2003). Bilingual visual word recognition: Evidence from masked phonological priming. In Kinoshita, S. & Lupker, S. J. (eds.), Masked priming: State-of-the-art. Hove: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Bugg, J. M. (2012). Dissociating levels of cognitive control: The case of Stroop Interference. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 21, 302–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carlson, S. M., & Meltzoff, A. M. (2008). Bilingual experience and executive functioning in young children. Developmental Science, 11, 282–298.Google Scholar
Chertkow, H., Whitehead, V., Phillips, N., Wolfson, C., Atherton, J., & Bergman, H. (2010). Multilingualism (but not always bilingualism) delays the onset of Alzheimer's disease – evidence from a bilingual community. Alzheimer's Disease & Associated Disorders, 24, 118–125.Google Scholar
Coderre, E., Conklin, K., & Van Heuven, W. J. B. (2011). Electrophysiological measures of conflict detection and resolution in the Stroop task. Brain Research, 1413, 51–59.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Costa, A., Hernández, M., Costa-Faidella, J., & Sebastián-Gallés, N. (2009). On the bilingual advantage in conflict processing: Now you see it, now you don't. Cognition, 113, 135–149.Google Scholar
Costa, A., Hernández, M., & Sebastián-Gallés, N. (2008). Bilingualism aids conflict resolution: Evidence from the ANT task. Cognition, 106, 59–86.Google Scholar
De Neys, W., & Van Gelder, E. (2009). Logic and belief across the lifespan: The rise and fall of belief inhibition during syllogistic reasoning. Developmental Science, 12, 123–130.Google Scholar
Diamond, A. (2006). The early development of executive functions. In Bialystok, E. & Craik, F. I. M. (eds.), Lifespan cognition: Mechanisms of change, pp. 70–95. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diamond, A. (2011). Biological and social influences on cognitive control processes dependent on prefrontal cortex. In Braddick, O., Atkinson, J. & Innocenti, G. M. (eds.), Progress in Brain Research (vol. 189), pp. 319–339. Burlington: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Diamond, A., & Lee, K. (2011). Interventions shown to aid executive function development in children 4 to 12 years old. Science, 333, 959–964.Google Scholar
Diamond, J. (2010). The benefits of multilingualism. Science, 330, 332–333.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dijkstra, T. (2005). Bilingual visual word recognition and lexical access. In Kroll & De Groot (eds.), pp. 179–201.Google Scholar
Dijkstra, T., & Van Heuven, W. J. B. (2002). The architecture of the bilingual word recognition system: From identification to decision. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 5, 175–197.Google Scholar
Garbin, G., Sanjuan, A., Forn, C., Bustamante, J. C., Rodriguez-Pujadas, A., Belloch, V., Hernandez, M., Costa, A., & Ávila, C. (2010). Bridging language and attention: Brain basis of the impact of bilingualism on cognitive control. NeuroImage, 53, 1272–1278.Google Scholar
Gathercole, V. C. M., Thomas, E. M., Jones, L., Guasch, N. V., Young, N., & Hughes, E. K. (2010). Cognitive effects of bilingualism: Digging deeper for the contributions of language dominance, linguistic knowledge, socio-economic status and cognitive abilities. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 13, 617–664.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Godefroy, O., Jeannerod, M., Allain, P., & Le Gall, D. (2008). Lobe frontal, fonctions exécutives et controle cognitif: Frontal lobe, executive functions and cognitive control. Revue Neurologique, 164, 119–127.Google Scholar
Gollan, T. H., Montoya, R. I., Fennema-Notestine, C., & Morris, S. K. (2005). Bilingualism affects picture naming but not picture classification. Memory and Cognition, 33, 1220–1234.Google Scholar
Green, D. W. (1998). Mental control of the bilingual lexico-semantic system. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 1, 67–81.Google Scholar
Hanslmayr, S., Pastötter, B., Bäuml, K.-H., Gruber, S., Wimber, M., & Klimesch, W. (2008). The electrophysiological dynamics of interference during the Stroop task. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 20, 215–225.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Isel, F., Baumgaertner, A., Thrän, J., Meisel, J. M., & Büchel, C. (2010). Neural circuitry of the bilingual mental lexicon. Effect of age of second language acquisition. Brain and Cognition, 72, 169–180.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ivanova, I., & Costa, A. (2008). Does bilingualism hamper lexical access in speech production? Acta Psychologica, 127, 277–288.Google Scholar
Köpke, B. (2004). Neurolinguistic aspects of attrition. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 17, 3–30.Google Scholar
Kousaie, S., & Phillips, N. A. (2012). Ageing and bilingualism: Absence of a “bilingual advantage” in Stroop interference in a nonimmigrant sample. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 65, 356–369.Google Scholar
Kovács, A. M. (2009). Early bilingualism enhances mechanisms of false-belief reasoning. Developmental Science, 12, 48–54.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kovács, A. M., & Mehler, J. (2009). Cognitive gains in 7-month-old bilingual infants. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106, 6556–6560.Google Scholar
Kroll, J. F., Bogulski, C. A., & McClain, R. (2012). Psycholinguistic perspectives on second language learning and bilingualism: The course and consequence of cross-language competition. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 2, 1–24.Google Scholar
Kroll, J. F., & De Groot, A. M. B. (eds.) (2005). Handbook of bilingualism: Psycholinguistic approaches. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kroll, J. F., Dussias, P. E., Bogulski, C. A., & Valdes Kroff, J. R. (2012). Juggling two languages in one mind: What bilinguals tell us about language processing and its consequences for cognition. Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 56, 229–262.Google Scholar
Linck, J. A., Hoshino, N., & Kroll, J. F. (2008). Cross-language lexical processes and inhibitory control. The Mental Lexicon, 3, 349–374.Google Scholar
Linck, J. A., Kroll, J. F., & Sunderman, G. (2009). Losing access to the native language while immersed in a second language. Psychological Science, 20, 1507–1515.Google Scholar
Liotti, M., Woldorff, M. G., Perez III, R., & Mayberg, H. S. (2000). An ERP study of the temporal course of the Stroop color-word interference effect. Neuropsychologia, 38, 701–711.Google Scholar
Luk, G., Anderson, J. A. E., Craik, F. I. M., Grady, C. L., & Bialystok, E. (2010). Distinct neural correlates for two types of inhibition in bilinguals: Response inhibition versus interference suppression. Brain and Cognition, 74, 347–357.Google Scholar
Luk, G., Bialystok, E., Craik, F. I. M., & Grady, C. L. (2011). Lifelong bilingualism maintains white matter integrity in older adults. Journal of Neuroscience, 31, 16808–16813.Google Scholar
Luk, G., de Sa, E., & Bialystok, E. (2011). Is there a relation between onset age of bilingualism and enhancement of cognitive control? Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 14, 588–595.Google Scholar
Luk, G., Green, D. W., Abutalebi, J., & Grady, C. L. (2012). Cognitive control for language switching in bilinguals: A quantitative meta-analysis of functional neuroimaging studies. Language and Cognitive Processes, 27, 1479–1488.Google Scholar
MacLeod, C. M., & MacDonald, P. A. (2000). Interdimensional interference in the Stroop effect: Uncovering the cognitive and neural anatomy of attention. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4, 383–391.Google Scholar
MacWhinney, B. (2005). A unified model of language acquisition. In Kroll & De Groot (eds.), pp. 49–67.Google Scholar
Meisel, J. M. (2007). The weaker language in early child bilingualism: Acquiring a first language as a second language. Applied Psycholinguistics, 28, 495–514.Google Scholar
Misra, M., Guo, T., Bobb, S. C., & Kroll, J. F. (2012). When bilinguals choose a single word to speak: Electrophysiological evidence for inhibition of the native language. Journal of Memory and Language, 67, 224–237.Google Scholar
Miyake, A., Friedman, N. P., Emerson, M. J., Witzki, A. H., Howerter, A., & Wager, T. D. (2000). The unity and diversity of executive functions and their contributions to complex “Frontal Lobe” tasks: A latent variable analysis. Cognitive Psychology, 41, 49–100.Google Scholar
Morton, J. B., & Harper, S. N. (2007). What did Simon say? Revisiting the bilingual advantage. Developmental Science, 10, 719–726.Google Scholar
Naylor, L. J., Stanley, E. M., & Wicha, N. Y. Y. (2012). Cognitive and electrophysiological correlates of the bilingual Stroop effect. Frontiers in Psychology, 3. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00081.Google Scholar
Nowagk, R. (1998). Conan: A Barbarian Tool for Constrained Randomization (Version 1.9). Leipzig: Max-Planck-Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience Leipzig.Google Scholar
Pardo, J. V., Pardo, P. J., Janer, K. W., & Raichle, M. E. (1990). The anterior cingulate cortex mediates processing selection in the Stroop attentional conflict paradigm. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 87, 256–259.Google Scholar
Prior, A., & MacWhinney, B. (2010). A bilingual advantage in task switching. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 13, 253–262.Google Scholar
Pyers, J. E., Gollan, T. H., & Emmorey, K. (2009). Bimodal bilinguals reveal the source of tip-of-the-tongue states. Cognition, 112, 323–329.Google Scholar
Qiu, J., Luo, Y., Wang, Q., Zhang, F., & Zhang, Q. (2006). Brain mechanism of Stroop interference effect in Chinese characters. Brain Research, 1072, 186–193.Google Scholar
Schmid, M. S., & Köpke, B. (2007). Bilingualism and attrition. In Köpke, B., Schmid, M. S., Keijzer, M. & Dostert, S., (eds.), Language attrition: Theoretical perspectives, pp. 1–7. Amsterdam & Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Simon, J. R., & Ruddell, A. P. (1967). Auditory S–R compatibility: The effect of an irrelevant cue on information processing. Journal of Applied Psychology, 51, 300–304.Google Scholar
Stroop, J. R. (1935). Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 18, 643–662; reprint (1992): Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 121, 15–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tao, L., Marzecová, A., Taft, M., Asanowicz, D., & Wodniecka, Z. (2011). The efficiency of attentional networks in early and late bilinguals: The role of age of acquisition. Frontiers in Psychology, 2. doi: 10.3389 /fpsyg.2011.00123.Google Scholar
Tokowicz, N., & MacWhinney, B. (2005). Implicit and explicit measures of sensitivity to violations in second language grammar – an event-related potential investigation. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 27, 173–204.Google Scholar
Treitz, F. H. (2006). Die Veränderungen der Exekutivfunktionen während des nicht-pathologischen Alterungsprozesses: Verlauf und Prädiktoren. Ph.D. thesis, Ruhr-Universität Bochum.Google Scholar
Van Heuven, W. J. B., Dijkstra, T., & Grainger, J. (1998). Orthographic neighbourhood effects in bilingual word recognition. Journal of Memory and Language, 39, 458–483.Google Scholar
Van Veen, V., & Carter, C. S. (2005). Separating semantic conflict and response conflict in the Stroop task: A functional MRI study. Neuroimage, 27, 497–504.Google Scholar
Yang, S., Yang, H., & Lust, B. (2011). Early childhood bilingualism leads to advances in executive attention: Dissociating culture and language. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 14, 412–422.Google Scholar
Zelazo, P. D., Craik, F. I. M., & Booth, L. (2004). Executive function across the life span. Acta Psychologica, 115, 167–184.Google Scholar