Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T23:19:30.886Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The role of discursive features in SLA modeling and grammatical frequency – a response to Cheng, Lu and Giannakouros

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 November 2008

JOSEPH COLLENTINE
JOSEPH COLLENTINE*
Affiliation:
Northern Arizona University, Box 6004, Flagstaff, AZ 86011, [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Initial studies on the acquisition of two Spanish copulas, ser and estar, emerged from a research agenda exploring whether second language (L2) development was driven by universal mechanisms manifested in stages rather than an accumulation of entities (Rutherford, 1987). Concerning the Spanish copulas, the stages of acquisition through which Spanish L2 learners pass seem – with a few exceptions – to be largely uniform (e.g. estar + locative, ser/estar + adjective; VanPatten, 1987; Ryan & Lafford, 1992; Geeslin, 2000). Cheng, Lu and Giannakouros provide one of the first studies which partially test the assumption of universality, examining Mandarin Chinese speakers' copula behaviors over different levels of development. The work of Geeslin as well as Cheng, Lu and Giannakouros is valuable not so much because it provides insights into copula development but rather because this work is building a model for predicting the interaction in general terms between aspectual, semantic, and pragmatic factors and the acquisition of both grammatical and lexical L2 phenomena.

Type
Research Article
Information
Bilingualism: Language and Cognition , Volume 11 , Issue 3: LANGUAGE ACQUISITION, BILINGUALISM AND COPULA CHOICE IN SPANISH , November 2008 , pp. 319 - 321
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Biber, D., Davies, M., Jones, J. & Tracy-Ventura, N. (2006). Spoken and written register variation in Spanish: A multi-dimensional Analysis. Corpora 1, 1–37.Google Scholar
Geeslin, K. (2000). A new approach to the second language acquisition of copula choice in Spanish. In Leow, R. & Sanz, C. (eds.), Spanish applied linguistics at the turn of the millennium: Papers from the 1999 Conference on the L1 & L2 Acquisition of Spanish and Portuguese, pp. 50–66. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Givón, T. (1985). Function, structure, and language acquisition. In Slobin, D. (ed.), The cross-linguistic study of language acquisition. Hillsdale NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Oakes, M. P. (1998). Statistics for corpus linguistics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Robinson, P. (2005). Cognitive complexity and task sequencing: Studies in a componential framework for second language task design. IRAL 43, 1–32.Google Scholar
Rutherford, W. E. (1987). Second language grammar: Teaching and learning. Harlow: Pearson Education.Google Scholar
Ryan, J. & Lafford, B. (1992). The acquisition of lexical meaning in a study abroad environment: Ser + estar and the Granada experience. Hispania, 75, 714–722.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tabachnick, B. G. & Fidell, L. S. (2001). Using multivariate statistics. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar
VanPatten, B. (1987). Classroom learners' acquisition of ser and estar: Accounting for developmental patterns. In VanPatten, B., Dvorak, T. R. & Lee, J. F. (eds.), Foreign language learning: A research perspective, pp. 61–75. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar