Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T14:23:47.322Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Models as hypothesis generators and models as roadmaps

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 March 2010

MARC BRYSBAERT ,
NELE VERREYT  and
WOUTER DUYCK
MARC BRYSBAERT*
Affiliation:
Ghent University, Belgium
NELE VERREYT
Affiliation:
Ghent University, Belgium
WOUTER DUYCK
Affiliation:
Ghent University, Belgium
*
Address for correspondence: Marc Brysbaert, Department of Experimental Psychology, Ghent University, Henri Dunantlaan 2, B-9000 Gent, Belgium. Tel: +32 9 264 94 25. Fax: +32 9 264 64 96. [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In this reply to Kroll, Van Hell, Tokowicz and Green (this issue) we present an analysis of the citations made to the Revised Hierarchical Model (RHM). This gives us a quantitative summary of the current use of the RHM, showing that RHM has been used equally often to guide research in word recognition as in word production. We also question the claim that Brysbaert and Duyck's (this issue) focus on word recognition leaves RHM unscathed for the explanation of word production and the interactions between lexical and conceptual representations. For these research topics too, we feel that more progress will be made by adapting computational monolingual models to the bilingual situation rather than by trying to understand the findings from the RHM framework.

Keywords

Revised Hierarchical Modelbilingualismcomputational modeling
Type
Authors responses
Information
Bilingualism: Language and Cognition , Volume 13 , Issue 3 , July 2010 , pp. 383 - 384
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ameel, E., Malt, B. C., Storms, G., & Van Assche, F. (2009). Semantic convergence in the bilingual lexicon. Journal of Memory and Language, 60, 270–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brysbaert, M., & Duyck, W. (2010). Is it time to leave behind the Revised Hierarchical Model of bilingual language processing after fifteen years of service? Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 13, 359–371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kroll, J. F., & Stewart, E. (1994). Category interference in translation and picture naming: Evidence for asymmetric connections between bilingual memory representations. Journal of Memory and Language, 33, 149–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kroll, J. F., Van Hell, J. G., Tokowicz, N., & Green, D. W. (2010). The Revised Hierarchical Model: A critical review and assessment. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 13, 373–381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Popper, K. R. (1970). Normal science and its dangers. In Lakatos, I. & Musgrave, A. (eds.), Criticism and the growth of knowledge, pp. 51–58. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: PDF

Brysbaert supplementary material

Articles citing.pdf

Download Brysbaert supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 369 KB
Supplementary material: PDF

Brysbaert supplementary material

Topics cited.pdf

Download Brysbaert supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 93.2 KB