Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T13:56:00.743Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Lexicality, frequency and stress assignment effects in bilingual children reading Italian as a second language*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 December 2014

STÉPHANIE BELLOCCHI ,
PAOLA BONIFACCI  and
CRISTINA BURANI
STÉPHANIE BELLOCCHI*
Affiliation:
Aix Marseille University, Aix en Provence
PAOLA BONIFACCI
Affiliation:
University of Bologna, Bologna
CRISTINA BURANI
Affiliation:
Institute of Cognitive Sciences and Technologies, Rome & Department of Life Sciences, University of Trieste, Trieste
*
Address for correspondence: Stéphanie Bellocchi, Paul Valéry University, Route de Mende, 34199, Montpellier, France[email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In Italian, developing readers exhibit lexicality and frequency effects, and are sensitive to the distributional properties of the language. But how do bilingual children with different ages of first L2 (Italian) exposure and L2 vocabulary sizes read L2 words and pseudowords? Two reading aloud experiments investigated lexicality, frequency and stress assignment effects in fourth- and fifth-grade bilinguals and monolinguals. Naming latencies and pronunciation accuracy were analyzed. In Experiment 1, effects of lexicality and frequency and between-group differences emerged. In Experiment 2, the word frequency effect was confirmed. Late bilinguals, characterized by a smaller L2 vocabulary size, were less accurate than early bilinguals and monolinguals in assigning non-dominant stress. As with monolinguals, lexical information seems to be employed when reading Italian as a second language. Furthermore, bilingual readers are sensitive to the distributional properties of the language. Stress assignment is affected by the L2 lexicon size of second-language learners.

Keywords

lexicalityreadingstress assignmentage of L2 exposurebilingualismsecond-language learners
Type
Research Article
Information
Bilingualism: Language and Cognition , Volume 19 , Issue 1 , January 2016 , pp. 89 - 105
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

This work is dedicated to Silvana Contento, formerly Professor at the Faculty of Psychology, University of Bologna. The authors are very grateful to Silvana for sharing her interest in bilingualism and second-language learning with them, and for starting this scientific collaboration.

The authors also thank Ilaria Ceccarelli for her help with the data collection, and Silvia Primativo, Pasquale Rinaldi, and three anonymous referees for their useful comments. Finally, we are very grateful to Bruno Dauvier for his precious assistance with the data analysis.

Since this paper was accepted for publication, the first author's affiliation has changed from Aix Marseille University, Aix en Provence, to Paul Valéry University, Montpellier.

References

Akaike, H. (1974). A new look at the statistical model identification. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 19, 716–723.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andrews, S. (1992). Frequency and neighborhood effects on lexical access: Lexical similarity or orthographic redundancy? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Language, Memory, and Cognition, 18, 234–254.Google Scholar
Arciuli, J., & Cupples, L. (2006). The processing of lexical stress during visual word recognition: Typicality effects and orthographic correlates. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 59, 920–948.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Arciuli, J., Monaghan, P., & Ševa, N. (2010). Learning to assign lexical stress during reading aloud: Corpus, behavioral, and computational investigations. Journal of Memory and Language, 63, 180–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
August, D., & Shanahan, T. (2006). Developing literacy in second-language learners: Report of the National Literacy Panel on Minority-Language Children and Youth. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Baayen, R. H. (2008). Analyzing linguistic data: A practical introduction to statistics using R. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Baayen, R. H., Davidson, D. J., & Bates, D. M. (2008). Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items. Journal of Memory and Language, 59, 390–412.Google Scholar
Barca, L., Burani, C., & Arduino, L. S. (2002). Word naming times and psycholinguistic norms for Italian nouns. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 34, 424–434.Google Scholar
Barca, L., Burani, C., Di Filippo, G., & Zoccolotti, P. (2006). Italian developmental dyslexic and proficient readers: Where are the differences? Brain and Language, 98, 347–351.Google Scholar
Bates, D. M., Maechler, M., & Dai, B. (2008). Lme4: Linear mixed-effects models using S4 classes. R package version 0.999375–24. [Retrieved from http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=lme4].Google Scholar
Bellocchi, S. (2010). Una proposta di questionario per la raccolta di informazioni sulla storia linguistica di bambini bilingui [A proposal for a questionnaire to collect information on bilingual children's linguistic history]. Poster presented at the 19th national conference of AIRIPA, Ivrea, Italy.Google Scholar
Bellocchi, S., & Bastien-Toniazzo, M. (2011). Normal reading abilities and specific reading disabilities (developmental dyslexia): A cross linguistic study. Rivista di Psicolinguistica Applicata, 1–2, 69–86.Google Scholar
Bertinetto, P. M., Burani, C., Laudanna, A., Marconi, L., Ratti, D., Rolando, C., & Thornton, A. (2005). Corpus e Lessico di Frequenza dell’Italiano Scritto (CoLFIS) [CoLFIS. Corpus and Frequency Lexicon of Written Italian]. http://www.istc.cnr.it/grouppage/colfisEng.Google Scholar
Bialystok, E. (2009). Bilingualism: The good, the bad, and the indifferent. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 12, 3–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bialystok, E., & Barac, R. (2012). Emerging bilingualism: Dissociating advantages for metalinguistic awareness and executive control. Cognition, 122, 67–73.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bialystok, E., & Feng, X. (2009). Language proficiency and executive control in proactive interference: Evidence from monolingual and bilingual children and adults. Brain and Language, 109, 93–100.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bialystok, E., & Hakuta, K. (1999). Confounded age: Linguistic and cognitive factors in age differences for second language acquisition. In Birdsong, D. (ed.), Second language acquisition and the critical period hypothesis, pp. 162–181. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Bisiacchi, P. S., Cendron, M., Gugliotta, M., Tressoldi, P. E., & Vio, C. (2005). BVN 5–11 – Batteria di valutazione neuropsicologica per l’età evolutiva [Test for neuropsychological assessment]. Trento: Erickson.Google Scholar
Bonifacci, P., Giombini, L., Bellocchi, S., & Contento, S. (2011). Speed of processing, anticipation, inhibition and working memory in bilinguals. Developmental Science, 14, 256–269.Google Scholar
Burani, C., & Arduino, L. S. (2004). Stress regularity or consistency? Reading aloud Italian polysyllables with different stress patterns. Brain and Language, 90, 318–325.Google Scholar
Burani, C., & Cafiero, R. (1991). The role of sub-syllabic structure in lexical access to printed words. Psychological Research, 53, 42–52.Google Scholar
Burani, C., Marcolini, S., & Stella, G. (2002). How early does morpho-lexical reading develop in readers of a shallow orthography? Brain and Language, 81, 568–586.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burani, C., Paizi, D., & Sulpizio, S. (2014). Stress assignment in Italian: Friendship outweighs dominance. Memory & Cognition, 42, 662–675.Google Scholar
Colombo, L. (1992). Lexical stress effect and its interaction with frequency in word pronunciation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18, 987–1003.Google Scholar
Colombo, L., Pasini, M., & Balota, A. D. (2006). Dissociating the influence of familiarity and meaningfulness from word frequency in naming and lexical decision performance. Memory & Cognition, 34, 1312–1324.Google Scholar
Contento, S., Bellocchi, S., & Bonifacci, P. (2013). BaBIL. Prove per la valutazione delle competenze verbali e non verbali in bambini bilingui [BaBIL: Tests for the assessment of verbal and non-verbal abilities in bilingual children]. Florence: Giunti O.S.Google Scholar
Cornoldi, C., & Colpo, G. (1998). Prove di lettura MT per la scuola elementare [MT Reading tests for primary schools]. Florence: Giunti O.S.Google Scholar
Costa, A., Hernàndez, M., & Sebastián-Gallés, N. (2008). Bilingualism aids conflict resolution: Evidence from the ANT task. Cognition, 106, 59–86.Google Scholar
Dauvier, B., Chevalier, N., & Blaye, A. (2012). Using finite mixture of GLMs to explore variability in children's flexibility in a task-switching paradigm. Cognitive Development, 27, 440–454.Google Scholar
Dupoux, E., Pallier, C., Sebastián-Gallés, N., & Mehler, J. (1997). A destressing “deafness” in French? Journal of Memory and Language, 36, 406–421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dupoux, E., Peperkamp, S., & Sebastián-Gallés, N. (2001). A robust method to study stress “deafness”. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 110, 1606–1618.Google Scholar
Erdos, C., Genesee, F., Savage, R., & Haigh, C. (2010). Individual differences in second language reading outcomes. International Journal of Bilingualism, 15, 3–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Erdos, C., Genesee, F., Savage, R., & Haigh, C. (2014). Predicting risk for oral and written language learning difficulties in students educated in a second language. Applied Psycholinguistics, 35, 371–398.Google Scholar
Flege, J. E., MacKay, I. R. A., & Meador, D. (1999). Native Italian speakers’ perception and production of English vowels. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 106, 2973–2987.Google Scholar
Flege, J. E., Munro, M. J., & MacKay, I. R. A. (1995). Factors affecting strength of perceived foreign accent in a second language. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 97, 3125–3134.Google Scholar
Genesee, F. (1989). Early bilingual development: One language or two? Journal of Child Language, 16, 161–179.Google Scholar
Genesee, F. (2007). French immersion and at-risk students: A review of research findings. Canadian Modern Language Review, 63, 655–688.Google Scholar
Genesee, F., & Jared, D. (2008). Literacy development in early French immersion programs. Canadian Psychology, 49, 140–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Genesee, F., & Lindholm-Leary, K. (2012). The education of English language learners. In Harris, K., Graham, S. & Urdan, T. (eds.), APA educational psychology handbook, Washington, DC: APA Books, pp. 499–526.Google Scholar
Genesee, F., Lindholm-Leary, K., Saunders, W., & Christian, D. (2006). Educating English language learners: A synthesis of research evidence. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goetry, V., Wade-Woolley, L., Kolinsky, R., & Mousty, P. (2006). The role of stress processing abilities in the development of bilingual reading. Journal of Research in Reading, 29, 349–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holowka, S., Brosseau-Lapré, F., & Petitto, L. A. (2002). Semantic and conceptual knowledge underlying bilingual babies’ first signs and words. Language Learning, 52, 205–262.Google Scholar
Isel, F., Baumgärtner, A., Thraen, J., Meisel, J. M., & Buechel, C. (2010). Neural circuitry of the bilingual mental lexicon: Effect of age of second language acquisition. Brain and Cognition, 72, 169–180.Google Scholar
Jansen, P. A., & Watter, S. (2008). SayWhen: An automated method for high-accuracy speech onset detection. Behavior Research Methods, 40, 744–751.Google Scholar
Johnson, J. S., & Newport, E. L. (1989). Critical period effects in second language learning: The influence of maturational state on the acquisition of English as a second language. Cognitive Psychology, 21, 60–99.Google Scholar
Juhasz, B. J. (2005). Age-of-acquisition effects in word and picture identification. Psychological Bulletin, 131, 684–712.Google Scholar
Kaufman, A. S., & Kaufman, N. L. (2004). Kaufman brief intelligence test. Circle Pines, MN: AGS.Google Scholar
Kelly, M. H., Morris, J., & Verrekia, L. (1998). Orthographic cues to lexical stress: Effects on naming and lexical decision. Memory & Cognition, 26, 822–832.Google Scholar
Kessler, B., Treiman, R., & Mullennix, J. (2002). Phonetic biases in voice key response time measurements. Journal of Memory and Language, 47, 145–171.Google Scholar
Kirby, J. R., Desrochers, A., Roth, L., & Sandy, S. V. L. (2008). Longitudinal predictors of word reading development. Canadian Psychology, 49, 103–110.Google Scholar
Kovelman, I., Baker, S. A., & Petitto, L. A. (2008). Age of first bilingual language exposure as a new window into bilingual reading development. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 11, 203–223.Google Scholar
Krämer, M. (2009). The phonology of Italian. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lenneberg, E. H. (1967). Biological foundations of language. Oxford: Wiley.Google Scholar
Locke, J. L. (1997). A theory of neurolinguistic development. Brain and Language, 58, 265–326.Google Scholar
Marconi, L., Ott, M., Pesenti, E., Ratti, D., & Tavella, M. (1993). Lessico elementare. Dati statistici sull’italiano letto e scritto dai bambini delle elementari [Elementary lexicon: Statistical data for Italian written and read by elementary school children]. Bologna: Zanichelli.Google Scholar
Marinova-Todd, S. H., Marshall, D. B., & Snow, C. E. (2000). Three misconceptions about age and L2 learning. TESOL Quarterly, 34, 9–34.Google Scholar
Mazzotta, S., Barca, L., Marcolini, S., Stella, G., & Burani, C. (2005). Frequenza, immaginabilità ed età di acquisizione delle parole: in che misura influenzano la lettura dei bambini italiani? [Frequency, imageability, and age-of-acquisition of words: How do they affect Italian children's reading aloud?] Psicologia Clinica dello Sviluppo, 9, 247–266.Google Scholar
Noel, Y. (2013). Psychologie statistique avec R [Statistic psychology with R]. Paris: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pagliuca, G., Arduino, L. S., Barca, L., & Burani, C. (2008). Fully transparent orthography, yet lexical reading aloud: The lexicality effect in Italian. Language and Cognitive Processes, 23, 422–433.Google Scholar
Paizi, D., De Luca, M., Zoccolotti, P., & Burani, C. (2013). A comprehensive evaluation of lexical reading in Italian developmental dyslexics. Journal of Research in Reading, 3, 303–329.Google Scholar
Paizi, D., Zoccolotti, P., & Burani, C. (2011). Lexical stress assignment in Italian developmental dyslexia. Reading and Writing, 24, 443–461.Google Scholar
Paradis, J., Genesee, F., & Crago, M. B. (2011). Dual language development and disorders. Baltimore, MD: Brookes Publishing.Google Scholar
Pearson, B. Z. (1998). Assessing lexical development in bilingual babies and toddlers. International Journal of Bilingualism, 2, 347–372.Google Scholar
Pearson, B. Z., Fernández, S. C., & Oller, D. K. (1993). Lexical development in bilingual infants and toddlers: Comparison to monolingual norms. Language Learning, 43, 93–120.Google Scholar
Penfield, W., & Roberts, L. (1959). Speech and brain mechanisms. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Perani, D., Abutalebi, J., Paulesu, E., Brambati, S., Scifo, P., & Cappa, S. F. (2003). The role of age of acquisition and language usage in early, high-proficient bilinguals: An fMRI study during verbal fluency. Human Brain Mapping, 19, 170–182.Google Scholar
Petitto, L. A., Katerelos, M., Levy, B., Gauna, K., Tétrault, K., & Ferraro, V. (2001). Bilingual signed and spoken language acquisition from birth: Implications for mechanisms underlying bilingual language acquisition. Journal of Child Language, 28, 1–44.Google Scholar
Petitto, L. A., & Kovelman, I. (2003). The bilingual paradox: How signing–speaking bilingual children help us resolve bilingual issues and teach us about the brain's mechanisms underlying all language acquisition. Learning Languages, 8, 5–18.Google Scholar
Primativo, S., O’Brien, S., Paizi, D., Rinaldi, P., Arduino, L. S., & Burani, C. (2013). Bilingual vocabulary size and lexical reading in Italian. Acta Psychologica, 144, 554–562.Google Scholar
Rastle, K., & Coltheart, M. (2000). Lexical and nonlexical print-to-sound translation of disyllabic words and nonwords. Journal of Memory & Language, 42, 342–364.Google Scholar
Sartori, G., Job, R., & Tressoldi, P. E. (2007). DDE-2. Batteria per la valutazione della Dislessia e della Disortografia Evolutiva [Developmental dyslexia and dysorthographia assessment battery]. Florence: Giunti O.S.Google Scholar
Seidenberg, M. S., Waters, G. S., Barnes, M., & Tanenhaus, M. K. (1984). When does irregular spelling or pronunciation influence word recognition? Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 23, 383–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slavin, R. E., & Cheung, A. (2003). Effective programs for English language learners: A best-evidence synthesis. Baltimore, MD: CRESPAR.Google Scholar
Sulpizio, S., Arduino, L. S., Paizi, D., & Burani, C. (2013). Stress assignment in reading Italian polysyllabic pseudowords. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 39, 51–68.Google Scholar
Sulpizio, S., & Colombo, L. (2013). Lexical stress, frequency, and stress neighborhood effects in the early stages of Italian reading development. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 66, 2073–2084.Google Scholar
Sulpizio, S., Boureux, M., Burani, C., Deguchi, C., & Colombo, L. (2012). Stress assignment in the development of reading aloud: Nonword priming effects on Italian children. In Miyake, N., Peebles, D. & Cooper, R. P. (eds.), Proceedings of the 34th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, pp. 2369–2374. Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.Google Scholar
Thornton, A. M., Iacobini, C., & Burani, C. (1997). BDVDB. Una base di dati sul vocabolario di base della lingua italiana [BDVDB: A database for the Italian basic dictionary]. Rome: Bulzoni.Google Scholar
Uchikoshi, Y., & Marinova-Todd, S. H. (2012). Language proficiency and early literacy skills of Cantonese-speaking English language learners in the U.S. and Canada. Reading and Writing, 25, 2107–2129.Google Scholar
Wagenmakers, E. J., & Raaijmakers, J. G. W. (2006). Long-term priming of neighbors biases the word recognition process: Evidence from a lexical decision task. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 60, 275–284.Google Scholar
Ziegler, J. C., & Goswami, U. C. (2005). Reading acquisition, developmental dyslexia and skilled reading across languages: A psycholinguistic grain size theory. Psychological Bulletin, 131, 3–29.Google Scholar