Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T16:59:51.808Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Bilingual experience modulates hemispheric lateralization in visual word processing*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 December 2013

SZE-MAN LAM  and
JANET H. HSIAO
SZE-MAN LAM
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, The University of Hong Kong
JANET H. HSIAO*
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, The University of Hong Kong
*
Address for correspondence: Janet H. Hsiao, Department of Psychology, The University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam Road, Hong Kong[email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Previous studies showed reduced hemispheric asymmetry in face perception in bilinguals compared with monolinguals, suggesting that hemispheric asymmetry in visual stimulus processing may be modulated by language reading experience. Here we examined whether this phenomenon can also be observed in bilinguals with different language backgrounds. We compared English monolinguals, European–English bilinguals (who know two alphabetic languages), and Chinese–English bilinguals (who have mastered a logographic and an alphabetic language) in an English word sequential matching task. We showed that European–English bilinguals had a stronger right visual field/left hemispheric advantage than the other two groups, suggesting that different language experiences can influence how visual words are processed in the brain. In addition, by using a computational model that implements a theory of hemispheric asymmetry in perception, we showed that this lateralization difference could be accounted for by the difference in participants’ vocabulary size and the difference in word-to-sound mapping between alphabetic and logographic languages.

Keywords

bilinguialismvisual word processinghemispheric lateralization
Type
Research Article
Information
Bilingualism: Language and Cognition , Volume 17 , Issue 3 , July 2014 , pp. 589 - 609
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

This research was supported by the Research Grant Council of Hong Kong (project code: HKU 744509H and 745210H to J. H. Hsiao). We thank the editor, Professor Marc Brysbaert, and two anonymous reviewers for helpful comments.

References

Allman, B. (2005). Vocabulary size and accuracy of monolingual and bilingual preschool children. Proceedings of the 4th International Symposium on Bilingualism, pp. 58–77. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Beaton, A. A., Suller, S., & Workman, L. (2007). Visual laterality effects in readers of a deep and a shallow orthography. Laterality, 12, 199–215.Google Scholar
Ben-Zeev, S. (1977). The influence of bilingualism one cognitive strategy and cognitive development. Child Development, 48, 1009–1018.Google Scholar
Brady, N., Campbell, M., & Flaherty, M. (2005). Perceptual asymmetries are preserved in memory for highly familiar faces of self and friend. Brain and Cognition, 58, 334–342.Google Scholar
Brand, N., van Bekkum, I., Stumpel, M., & Kroeze, J. H. (1983). Word matching and lexical decisions: A visual half-field study. Brain and Language, 18, 199–211.Google Scholar
Bryden, M. P., & Rainey, C. A. (1963). Left–right differences in tachistoscopic recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 66, 568–571.Google Scholar
Brysbaert, M., & Duyck, W. (2010). Is it time to leave behind the Revised Hierarchical Model of bilinguals language processing after fifteen years of service? Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 13, 359–371.Google Scholar
Brysbaert, M., & d'Ydewalle, G. (1990). Tachistoscopic presentation of verbal stimuli for assessing cerebral dominance: Reliability data and some practical recommendations. Neuropsychologia, 28, 443–455.Google Scholar
Brysbaert, M., & New, B. (2009). Moving beyond Kučera and Francis: A critical evaluation of current word frequency norms and the introduction of a new and improved word frequency measure for American English. Behavior Research Methods, 41, 977–990.Google Scholar
Cheng, C. M., & Yang, M. J. (1989). Lateralization in the visual perception of Chinese characters and words. Brain and Language, 36, 669–689.Google Scholar
Cheung, K. C. F., & Hsiao, J. H. (2010). Visual and task characteristics may explain hemispheric asymmetry in visual word recognition. In Ohlsson, S. & Catrambone, R. (eds.), Proceedings of the 32nd Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, pp. 1441–1446. Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.Google Scholar
Christman, S., Kitterle, F. L., & Hellige, J. (1991). Hemispheric asymmetry in the processing of absolute versus relative spatial frequency. Brain and Cognition, 16, 62–73.Google Scholar
Chung, S. T. L. (2007). Learning to identify crowded letters: Does it improve reading speed? Vision Research, 47, 3150–3159.Google Scholar
Daugman, J. G. (1985). Uncertainty relation for resolution in space, spatial frequency, and orientation optimized by two-dimensional visual cortical filters. Journal of Optical Society of America A, 2, 1160–1169.Google Scholar
Faust, M., Babkoff, H., & Kravetz, S. (1995). Linguistic processes in the two cerebral hemispheres: Implications for modularity vs interactionism. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 17, 171–192.Google Scholar
Gauthier, I., Skudlarski, P., Gore, J. C., & Anderson, A. W. (2000). Expertise for cars and birds recruits brain areas involved in face recognition. Nature Neuroscience, 3, 191–197.Google Scholar
Gibson, A. R., Dimond, S. J., & Gazzaniga, M. S. (1972). Left field superiority for word matching. Neuropsychologia, 10, 463–466.Google Scholar
Gilbert, C., & Bakan, P. (1973). Visual asymmetry in perception of faces. Neuropsychologia, 11, 355–362.Google Scholar
Green, C. S., & Bavelier, D. (2007). Action-video-game experience alters the spatial resolution of vision. Psychological Science, 18, 88–94.Google Scholar
Hartmann, W. M. (2004). Signals, sound and sensation (5th edn.). New York: American Institute of Physics.Google Scholar
Hatta, T. (1977). Recognition of Japanese Kanji in the left and right visual fields. Neuropsychologia, 15, 685–588.Google Scholar
Hausmann, M., Durmusoglu, G., Yazgan, Y., & Gunturkun, O. (2004). Evidence for reduced hemispheric asymmetries in non-verbal functions in bilinguals. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 17, 285–299.Google Scholar
Heinze, H. J., Hinrichs, H., Scholz, M., Burchert, W., & Mangun, G. R. (1998). Neural mechanisms of global and local processing: A combined PET and ERP study. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 10, 485–498.Google Scholar
Hirata, K., & Osaka, R. (1967). Tachistoscopic recognition of Japanese letter materials in left and right visual fields. Psychologia, 10, 7–18.Google Scholar
Hsiao, J. H., & Cheung, K. (2011). The modulation of word type frequency on hemispheric lateralization in visual word recognition: Evidence from modeling Chinese character recognition. In Carlson, L., Hoelscher, C. & Shipley, T. F. (eds.), Proceedings of the 33rd Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, pp. 891–896. Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.Google Scholar
Hsiao, J. H., Cipollini, B., & Cottrell, G. (2013). Hemispheric asymmetry in perception: A differential encoding account. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 25, 998–1007.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hsiao, J. H., & Cottrell, G. W. (2009). Not all visual expertise is holistic, but it may be leftist: The case of Chinese character recognition. Psychological Science, 20, 455–463.Google Scholar
Hsiao, J. H., & Lam, S. M. (2013). The modulation of visual and task characteristics of a writing system on hemispheric lateralization in visual word recognition – A computational exploration. Cognitive Science, 37, 861–890.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hsiao, J. H., Shieh, D. X., & Cottrell, G. W. (2008). Convergence of the visual field split: Hemispheric modeling of face and object recognition. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 20, 2298–2307.Google Scholar
Hsiao, J. H., & Shillcock, R. (2006). Analysis of a Chinese phonetic compound database: Implications for orthographic processing. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 35, 405–426.Google Scholar
Hull, R., & Vaid, J. (2007). Bilingual language lateralization: A meta–analytic tale of two hemispheres. Neuropsychologia, 45, 1987–2008.Google Scholar
Ivry, R. B., & Robertson, L. C. (1998). The two sides of perception. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Kanwisher, N., McDermott, J., & Chun, M. M. (1997). The fusiform face area: A module in human extrastriate cortex specialized for face perception. Journal of Neuroscience, 17, 4302–4311.Google Scholar
Kim, K. H. S., Relkin, N. R., Lee, K. M., & Hirsch, J. (1997). Distinct cortical areas associated with native and second languages. Nature, 288, 171–174.Google Scholar
Kitterle, F. L., Christman, S., & Hellige, J. B. (1990). Hemispheric differences are found in the identification, but not the detection, of low versus high spatial frequencies. Perception & Psychophysics, 48, 297–306.Google Scholar
Kovelman, I., Baker, S. A., & Petitto, L.-A. (2008). Bilingual and monolingual brains compared: A functional magnetic resonance imaging investigation of syntactic processing and a possible “Neural Signature” of bilingualism. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 20, 153–169.Google Scholar
Lades, M., Vorbruggen, J. C., Buhmann, J., Lange, J., von der Malsburg, C., Wurtz, R. P., & Konen, W. (1993). Distortion invariant object recognition in the dynamic link architecture. IEEE Transaction on Computers, 42, 300–311.Google Scholar
Le Grand, R., Mondloch, C. J., Maurer, D., & Brent, H. P. (2003). Expert face processing requires visual input to the right hemisphere during infancy. Nature Neuroscience, 6, 1108–1112.Google Scholar
Lemhöfer, K., & Broersma, M. (2012). Introducing LexTALE: A quick and valid lexical test for advanced learners of English. Behavior Research Methods, 44, 325–343.Google Scholar
Leong, C. K., Wong, S., Wong, A., & Hiscock, M. (1985). Differential cerebral involvement in perceiving Chinese characters: Levels of processing approach. Brain and Langauge, 26, 131–145.Google Scholar
Maurer, U., Brandeis, D., & McCandliss, B. D. (2005). Fast, visual specialization for reading in English revealed by the topography of the N170 ERP response. Behavioral & Brain Functions, 1, 13.Google Scholar
Maurer, U., & McCandliss, B. D. (2007). The development of visual expertise for words: The contribution of eletrophysiology. In Grigorenko, E. L. & Naples, A. (eds.), Single-word reading: Cognitive, behavioral and biological perspectives, pp. 43–64. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
McCandliss, B. D., Cohen, L., & Dehaene, S. (2003). The visual word form area: Expertise for reading in the fusiform gyrus. Trends in Cognitive Science, 7, 293–299.Google Scholar
McGugin, R. W., McKeeff, T. J., Tong, F., & Gauthier, I. (2011). Irrelevant objects of expertise compete with faces during visual search. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 73, 309–317.Google Scholar
Nakamura, K., Oga, T., Okada, T., Sadato, N., Takayama, Y., Wydell, T., Yonekura, Y., & Fukuyama, H. (2005). Hemisphereic asymmetry emerges at distinct parts of the occipitotemporal cortex for objects, logograms and phonograms: A functional MRI study. NeuroImage, 28, 521–528.Google Scholar
Oldfield, R. C. (1971). The assessment and analysis of handedness: The Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia, 9, 97–113.Google Scholar
Pearson, B., Fernandez, S. C., & Oller, D. K. (1993). Lexical development in bilingual infants and toddlers: Comparison to monolingual norms. Language Learning, 43, 93–120.Google Scholar
Pelli, D. G., Palmares, M., & Majaj, N. J. (2004). Crowding is unlike ordinary masking: Distinguishing feature integration from detection. Journal of Vision, 4, 1136–1169.Google Scholar
Rhodes, G. (1993). Configural coding, expertise, and the right hemisphere advantage for face recognition. Brain and Cognition, 22, 19–41.Google Scholar
Rossion, B., Kung, C. C., & Tarr, M. J. (2004). Visual expertise with nonface objects leads to competition with the early perceptual processing of faces in the human occipitotemporal cortex. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 101, 14521–14526.Google Scholar
Sanger, T. D. (1989). An optimality principle for unsupervised learning. In Touretzky, D. (ed.), Advances in neural information processing systems (vol. 1), pp. 11–19. San Mateo, CA: Morgan Kaufmann.Google Scholar
Sergent, J. (1982). The cerebral balance of power: Confrontation or cooperation? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 8, 253–272.Google Scholar
Sewell, D. F., & Panou, L. (1983). Visual field asymmetries for verbal and dot localization tasks in monolingual and bilingual subjects. Brain and Language, 18, 28–34.Google Scholar
Tan, L. H., Laird, A. R., Li, K., & Fox, P. T. (2005). Neuroanatomical correlates of phonological processing of Chinese characters and alphabetic words: A meta-analysis. Human Brain Mapping, 25, 83–91.Google Scholar
Tan, L. H., Liu, H. L., Perfetti, C. A., Spinks, J. A., Fox, P. T., & Gao, J. H. (2001). The neural system underlying Chinese logograph reading. NeuroImage, 13, 836–846.Google Scholar
Tan, L. H., Spinks, J. A., Gao, J. H., Liu, H. L., Perfetti, C. A., Xiong, J., Stofer, K. A., Pu, Y., Liu, Y., & Fox, P. T. (2000). Brain activation in the processing of Chinese characters and words: A functional MRI study. Human Brain Mapping, 10, 16–27.3.0.CO;2-M>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thorn, A. S. C., & Gathercole, S. E. (1999). Langauge-specific knowledge and short-term memory in bilingual and non-bilingual children. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 52A, 303–324.Google Scholar
Tzeng, O. J. L., Hung, D. L., Cotton, B., & Wang, W. S. Y. (1979). Visual lateralisation effect in reading Chinese characters. Nature, 282, 499–501.Google Scholar
Van Heuven, W. J. B., Dijkstra, T., & Grainger, J. (1998). Orthographic neighborhood effects in bilingual word recognition. Journal of Memory and Language, 39, 458–483.Google Scholar
Wang, Y., Xiang, J., Vannest, J., Holroyd, T., Narmoneva, D., Horn, P., Liu, Y., Rose, D., deGrauw, T., & Holland, S. (2011). Neuromagnetic measures of word processing in bilinguals and monolinguals. Clinical Neurophysiology, 122, 1706–1717.Google Scholar
Weekes, B. S., & Zhang, B. Y. (1999). Chinese character recognition in the left and right visual fields. Brain & Cognition, 40, 269–272.Google Scholar
Witelson, S. F. (1976). Sex and the single hemisphere: Specialization of the right hemisphere for spatial processing. Science, 193, 245–247.Google Scholar
Wong, Y. K., & Gauthier, I. (2010a). A multimodal neural network recruited by expertise with musical notation. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 22, 695–713.Google Scholar
Wong, Y. K., & Gauthier, I. (2010b). Holistic processing of musical notation: Dissociating failures of selective attention in experts and novices. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 10, 541–551.Google Scholar
Xing, H., Shu, H., & Li, P. (2004). The acquisition of Chinese characters: Corpus analyses and connectionist simulations. Journal of Cognitive Science, 5, 1–49.Google Scholar
Yang, M. J., & Cheng, C. M. (1999). Hemisphere differences in accessing lexical knowledge of Chinese characters. Laterality, 4, 149–166.Google Scholar
Yang, J., Shu, H., McCandliss, B. D., & Zevin, J. D. (2013). Orthographic influences on division of labor in learning to read Chinese and English: Insights from computational modeling. Bilingualism: Language & Cognition, 16, 354–366.Google Scholar