Hostname: page-component-6bf8c574d5-mcfzb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-03-09T16:20:46.166Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Access, prestige and losses in contact languages

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2013

MIKAEL PARKVALL
MIKAEL PARKVALL*
Affiliation:
Institutionen för lingvistik, Stockholms [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

I am generally positive about Muysken's (M) approach, and the potential use of unifying various seemingly related phenomena is obvious. The approach could also serve as a tool in determining to what extent these phenomena actually are sides of the same coin (I am somewhat less convinced of this than most contact linguists).

Type
Peer Commentaries
Information
Bilingualism: Language and Cognition , Volume 16 , Issue 4 , October 2013 , pp. 746 - 747
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Baker, P. (1990). Off target? Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages, 5, 107–119.Google Scholar
Goddard, I. (2000). The use of Pidgins and jargons on the East Coast of North America. In Gray, E. & Fiering, N. (eds.), The language encounter in the Americas, 1492–1800, pp. 61–78. New York: Berghahn Books.Google Scholar
Roberts, S. (2004). The emergence of Hawai'i Creole English in the early 20th century: The sociohistorical context of Creole genesis. Ph.D. dissertation, Stanford University.Google Scholar