No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Some issues in Smoking Modification Research
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 16 June 2009
Extract
Behavioural psychotherapists have contributed an enormous amount of research to the problem of smoking; The attraction of smoking as a research field is fairly easy to see. Smokers constitute a high proportion of the adult population of most industrialised countries. A large, reasonably homogeneous subject pool is therefore readily available for research, and since so many smokers claim a desire to stop smoking (McKennell and Thomas 1967), they are ideal for clinical research. In addition the behaviour itself is easy to measure and it is fairly easy to demonstrate behaviour change as a result of therapeutic intervention. Smoking lends itself readily to analysis using the concepts of behavioural psychology, and because such large populations of smokers are always available for therapeutic research, the application of traditional experimental methodology (based upon controlled group comparisons with random allocation of subjects to groups) is quite easy. Despite these apparently favourable conditions, relatively little progress has been made in terms of therapeutic success rates (Bernstein 1969, Bernstein and McAlister 1975). The purpose of this paper is to suggest some reasons for this, and to suggest that behavioural psychotherapists still have a very important role to play in the smoking withdrawal field.
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © British Association for Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapies 1975
References
REFERENCES
Bernstein, D.A. (1969) “Modification of smoking behaviour: an evaluative review”. Psychological Bulletin, 71, 418–440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernstein, D.A. (1970) “The modification of smoking behaviour: an evaluative review”. pp.3–41, in Hunt, W.A. (Ed.) Learning mechanisms in smoking. Aldine: Chicago.Google Scholar
Bernstein, D.A. and McAlister, A.“The modification of smoking behaviour: progress and problems”, Journal of Addictive Behaviours; in press.Google Scholar
Brengelmann, J. et al. . Unpublished report of a smoking project from the Max Planck Institute, Munick.Google Scholar
Chapman, R.F., Smith, J.W., and Layden, T.A. (1971) “Elimination of cigarette smoking by punishment and self-management training” Behaviour Research and Therapy, 9, 255–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hunt, W.A. and Matarazzb, J.D. (1973) “Recent developments in the experimental modification of smoking behaviour” Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 81, 107–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matthews, Andrew, (1975) “Research design and clinical practice in behaviour therapy”, B.A.B.P. Bulletin, 3, 43–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McFall, R.M. and Hammen, C.L. (1971) “Motivation structure and self-monitoring role of non-specific factors in smoking reduction”, Journal of consulting and Clinical Psychology, 37, 80–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McKennel, A.C. and Thomas, R.K. (1967) “Adults' and adolescents' smoking habits and attitudes”, H.M.S.O.: London.Google Scholar
Russell, M.A.H. (1973) “Changes in cigarette price and consumption by men in Britain 1946–71”, British Journal of Preventive and Social Medicine, 27, 1–7.Google Scholar
Russell, M.A.H. (1974a) “Realistic goals for smoking and health” Lancet, 1, Feb, 16, 254–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Russell, M.A.H. (1974) “The smoking habit and its classification” The Practitioners, 212, 791–800.Google Scholar
Russell, M.A.H., Armstrong, E. and Patel, U.A. “Temporal contignity in electric aversion therapy for cigarette smoking” Behaviour Research and Therapy, in press.Google Scholar
Schwartz, J.L. (1975) “Research methodology in smoking cessation: a critique”.Paper read at the 3rd World Conference on Smoking and Health,New York.Google Scholar
Comments
No Comments have been published for this article.