Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-68ccn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-15T14:19:51.091Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Slow versus Rapid Exposure in vivo of Phobics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 June 2009

Sahika Yuksel ,
Isaac Marks ,
Elizabeth Ramm  and
Anindya Ghosh
Sahika Yuksel
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, Capa Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
Isaac Marks
Affiliation:
Institute of Psychiatry,
Elizabeth Ramm
Affiliation:
Maudsley Hospital, London SE5 8AF
Anindya Ghosh
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, Capa Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Twenty-eight chronically phobic patients had therapist-aided exposure either rapidly or slowly. During therapist-aided exposure move to the next hierarchy item occurred after subjective anxiety had dropped, on a scale of 0–8 by two points (rapid) or by four points (slow). Exposure began with the lowest of eight hierarchy items. All patients had self-exposure homework between sessions. In a balanced design 12 patients were treated in London and 16 in Istanbul. Peak anxiety during sessions was comparable in both groups. Compared to slow exposure patients, rapid exposure patients completed treatment to criterion in fewer sessions and less time (4·7 vs. 5·8 sessions P< 0·01; 360 vs. 484 min P< 0·005). Criterion for termination of treatment was toleration of the highest hierarchy item with minimal discomfort, or a maximum of eight sessions. Both in London and in Istanbul rapid and slow groups improved substantially and similarly in phobias, social adjustment and mood; gains continued to 6 months follow-up. Compared to slower exposure, rapid exposure does not enhance final outcome but does shorten treatment time without increasing peak anxiety during sessions.

Type
Research Article
Information
Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy , Volume 12 , Issue 3 , July 1984 , pp. 249 - 256
Copyright
Copyright © British Association for Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapies 1984

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Cohen, R. (1966). The effects of group interaction and progressive hierarchy presentation on desensitization of test anxiety. Behaviour Research and Therapy 4, 17–24.Google Scholar
Cohen, F. and Dean, S. J. (1968). Group desensitization of test anxiety. Proceedings of the 76th Annual Convention of the American Psychological Association 3, 615–616.Google Scholar
Guilani, B. (1972). The role of competing response and manner of presentation of the aversive stimulus in modification of avoidance behavior. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of California.Google Scholar
Hamilton, M. (1969). Standardised assessment and recording of depressive symptoms. Psychiatrica Neurologia Neurochirurgia 72, 201–205.Google ScholarPubMed
Krapfl, J. E. and Nawas, M. M. (1970). Differential orderings of stimulus presentation in systematic desensitization. Journal of Abnormal Psychology 75, 333–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marks, I. M. and Mathews, A. M. (1979). Brief standard self-rating for phobic patients. Behaviour Research and Therapy 17, 263–267.Google Scholar
Marks, I. M., Boulougouris, J. and Marset, P. (1971). Flooding versus desensitization in the treatment of phobic patients: a crossover study. British Journal of Psychiatry 119, 353–375.Google Scholar
Mathews, A. M. and Shaw, P. M. (1973). Continuous exposure and emotional arousal in flooding. Behaviour Research and Therapy 11, 587–598.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snaith, R. P., Ahmed, S. N., Mehta, S. and Hamilton, M. (1971). Assessment of the severity of primary depressive illness. Psychological Medicine 1, 143–149.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Suinn, R. M., Edie, C. A. and Spinelli, P. R. (1970). Accelerated massed desensitization: Innovation in short-term treatment. Behavior Therapy 1, 303–311.Google Scholar
Watson, J. P. and Marks, I. M. (1971). Relevant vs. irrelevant flooding in the treatment of phobias. Behavior Therapy 2, 275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Welch, H. J. and Krapfl, J. E. (1970). Order of stimulus presentation desensitization.Paper presented at the annual convention of the Midwestern Psychological Associaton,Cincinnati,May 1970.Google Scholar
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.