Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T17:23:37.998Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Single Case Study Illustrating the Reduction in Subvocalisation with Electromyography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 June 2009

Catherine Dooley  and
R. E. George
Catherine Dooley
Affiliation:
Departments of Psychology and Clinical Physics & Bioengineering, Guy's Hospital, London
R. E. George
Affiliation:
Departments of Psychology and Clinical Physics & Bioengineering, Guy's Hospital, London
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The effect of subvocalisation on reading speed and comprehension is briefly reviewed. Reading speed is slowed by subvocalisation but comprehension and retention of complex material is improved. In this single case study the activities of the laryngeal and mylohyoid muscles were recorded during reading and other activities. Through electromyographic biofeedback the patient learnt to reduce muscle tension and to discontinue the long term habit of subvocalisation.

Type
Research Article
Information
Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy , Volume 16 , Issue 3 , July 1988 , pp. 231 - 240
Copyright
Copyright © British Association for Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapies 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aarons, L. (1971). Subvocalisation: aural and EMG feedback in reading. Perceptual and Motor Skills 33, 271–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baddeley, A., Eldridge, M. and Lewis, V. (1981). The role of subvocalisation in reading.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 33-A, 439–454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edfeldt, A. W. (1960). Silent Speech and Silent Reading. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Gatchel, R. J. and Price, K. P. (Eds) (1979). Clinical Applications of Biofeedback: Appraisal and Status. New York: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
Hardyck, C. D., Petrinovich, L. F. and Ellsworth, D. W. (1966). Feedback of speech muscle activity during silent reading: rapid extinction. Science 154, 1467–1468.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hardyck, C. D., Petrinovich, L. F. and Ellsworth, D. W. (1967). Feedback of speech muscle activity during silent reading: two comments. Science 157, 581.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hardyck, C. D. and Petrinovich, L. F. (1970). Subvocal speech and comprehension level as a function of the difficulty level of reading material. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behaviour 9, 647–652.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lippold, O. C. J. (1967). Electromyography: A Manual of Psychophysiological Methods. (Venables, P. H. & Martin, I., Eds). Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar
Neale, M. D. (1966). Neale Analysis of Reading Ability Manual. (2nd. ed). London: MacMillan Education.Google Scholar
Underwood, B. J. (1964). Articulation in verbal learning. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behaviour 3, 146–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watkins, M. W. (1979). Modification of subvocalisation levels in seventh-grade students with electromyographic biofeedback training and its effects on reading rate and comprehension, Ph.D. Thesis, University of Nebraska.Google Scholar
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.