Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T15:00:31.403Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Separating Common from Unique Variance Within Emotional Distress: An Examination of Reliability and Relations to Worry

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 January 2018

Andrew J. Marshall ,
Emma K. Evanovich ,
Sarah Jo David  and
Gregory H. Mumma
Andrew J. Marshall*
Affiliation:
Department of Psychological Sciences, Texas Tech University
Emma K. Evanovich
Affiliation:
Department of Psychological Sciences, Texas Tech University
Sarah Jo David
Affiliation:
Department of Psychological Sciences, Texas Tech University
Gregory H. Mumma
Affiliation:
Department of Psychological Sciences, Texas Tech University
*
Correspondence concerning this manuscript should be addressed to Andrew J. Marshall, Department of Psychological Sciences, Mail Stop 2051, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX 79409-2051, USA. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Background: High comorbidity rates among emotional disorders have led researchers to examine transdiagnostic factors that may contribute to shared psychopathology. Bifactor models provide a unique method for examining transdiagnostic variables by modelling the common and unique factors within measures. Previous findings suggest that the bifactor model of the Depression Anxiety and Stress Scale (DASS) may provide a method for examining transdiagnostic factors within emotional disorders. Aims: This study aimed to replicate the bifactor model of the DASS, a multidimensional measure of psychological distress, within a US adult sample and provide initial estimates of the reliability of the general and domain-specific factors. Furthermore, this study hypothesized that Worry, a theorized transdiagnostic variable, would show stronger relations to general emotional distress than domain-specific subscales. Method: Confirmatory factor analysis was used to evaluate the bifactor model structure of the DASS in 456 US adult participants (279 females and 177 males, mean age 35.9 years) recruited online. Results: The DASS bifactor model fitted well (CFI = 0.98; RMSEA = 0.05). The General Emotional Distress factor accounted for most of the reliable variance in item scores. Domain-specific subscales accounted for modest portions of reliable variance in items after accounting for the general scale. Finally, structural equation modelling indicated that Worry was strongly predicted by the General Emotional Distress factor. Conclusions: The DASS bifactor model is generalizable to a US community sample and General Emotional Distress, but not domain-specific factors, strongly predict the transdiagnostic variable Worry.

Keywords

bifactortripartitecomorbiditytransdiagnosticworry
Type
Brief Clinical Report
Information
Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy , Volume 46 , Issue 5 , September 2018 , pp. 633 - 638
Copyright
Copyright © British Association for Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapies 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Drost, J., van der Does, W., van Hemert, A. M., Penninx, B. H. and Spinhoven, P. (2014). Repetitive negative thinking as a transdiagnostic factor in depression and anxiety: a conceptual replication. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 63, 177–183. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2014.06.004Google Scholar
Gomez, R. (2013). Depression Anxiety Stress Scales: factor structure and differential item functioning across women and men. Personality and Individual Differences, 54, 687–691. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2012.11.025Google Scholar
Hu, L. T. and Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cut-off criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1–55.Google Scholar
Muthén, L. K. and Muthén, B. O. (1998–2012). Mplus User's Guide, seventh edition. Los Angeles, CA: Muthén and Muthén.Google Scholar
Olatunji, B. O., Broman-Fulks, J. J., Bergman, S. M., Green, B. A. and Zlomke, K. R. (2010). A taxometric investigation of the latent structure of worry: Dimensionality and associations with depression, anxiety, and stress. Behavior Therapy, 41, 212–228. doi: 10.1016/j.beth.2009.03.001Google Scholar
Rodriguez, A., Reise, S. P. and Haviland, M. G. (2015). Applying bifactor statistical indices in the evaluation of psychological measures. Journal of Personality Assessment, 98, 223–237. doi: 10.1080/00223891.2015.1089249Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Marshall et al. supplementary material

Marshall et al. supplementary material 1

Download Marshall et al. supplementary material(File)
File 51.7 KB
Supplementary material: File

Marshall et al. supplementary material

Table S1

Download Marshall et al. supplementary material(File)
File 23.5 KB
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.