Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T11:20:34.604Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Radical Behaviourist v Cognitive Psychology: a Pseudo-Quarrel?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 June 2009

M. J. V. Fennell
M. J. V. Fennell
Affiliation:
Dept of Psychology, University of Birmingham
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Data on the results of cognitive therapies and theoretical models to explain them are proliferating. Yet from the current state of the evidence it is clear that we have as yet been furnished far more richly with questions than answers. Watts (1977) has indicated some of the issues remaining. What relationship has cognitive behaviour therapy to cognitive psychology as a whole? What kind of cognitive processes is it concerned with? How should these be formulated and investigated? Can covert stimuli and behaviours be equated with overt, both functionally and formally? How far must the individual be aware of (able explicitly to discriminate and describe) covert processes? What is the use of imaginal stimuli in cognitive behaviour therapy? What kind of changes take place during it? The achievement of answers to these and related questions is more than likely to have been hindered than helped by the vituperative nature of the arguments raging between the radical behaviourist and cognitive fields.

Type
Research Article
Information
Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy , Volume 5 , Issue 4 , October 1977 , pp. 97 - 102
Copyright
Copyright © British Association for Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapies 1977

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References List

Bandura, A.Principles of behaviour modification. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1969Google Scholar
Bandura, A. and Barab, P.G.Processes governing disinhibitory effects through symbolic modeling. J.Abn.Psy., 1973, 82, 1–9CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Beck, A.T.Cognitive therapy and the emotional disorders. New York: International Universities Press, 1976Google Scholar
Bowers, K.S.Situationism in psychology: An analysis and a critique. Psy. Rev., 1973, 80, 307–336CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Briskman, L.B.Is a Kuhnian analysis applicable to psychology? Sci. Studies., 1972, 2, 87–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Broadbent, D.E.Behaviour. London: Eyre & Spottiswoode, 1961Google Scholar
Cherry, E.C.Some experiments on the recognition of speech with one and two ears. J.Acoust.Soc.Amer., 1953, 25, 975–979CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, N.Review of Skinner's ‘Verbal Behaviour’. Language, 1959, 35, 26–58Google Scholar
Dixon, N.F.Subliminal perception: The nature of a controversy. London: McGraw-Hill, 1971Google Scholar
D'Zurilla, T.J. and Goldfried, M.R.Problem-solving and behaviour modification. J.Abn.Psy., 1971, 78, 107–126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, A.Reason and emotion in psychotherapy. New York: Stuart, 1962Google Scholar
James, W.The principles of psychology. Vols I, II, New York: Holt, 1890Google Scholar
Kazdin, A.E.Covert modeling and the reduction of avoidance behaviour. J.Abn.Psy., 1974, 83, 240–252CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kazdin, A.E.Effects of covert modeling and model reinforcement on assertive behaviour. J.Abn.Psy., 1974, 83, 240–252CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kazdin, A.E.The effect of model identity and fear-relevant stimuli on covert modeling. Beh. Ther., 1974, 5, 624–635Google Scholar
Koch, S. Psychology as science. In Brown, S.C. (Ed.), Philosophy of psychology. London: MacMillan, 197Google Scholar
Mahoney, M.J.Cognition and behaviour modification. Cambridge, Mass.: Ballinger, 1974Google Scholar
Marzillier, J.S.A brief note on self-control. B.A.B.P. Bull., 1975, 4, 71–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marzillier, J.S.Cognitive behaviour modification: Mediating with Mahoney. B.A.B.P.Bull., 1976, 4, 25–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Millenson, J.Isomorphism between S-R notation and information-processing flow diagrams. Psy.Rec., 1967, 17, 305–319Google Scholar
Miller, G.A.Galanter, E. and Pribram, K.H.Plans and the structure of behaviour. New York: Holt, 1960CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, N.E. The influence of past experience upon the transfer of subsequent training. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Yale Univ., 1935Google Scholar
Mischel, W.Toward a cognitive social learning reconceptualization of personality. Psy.Rev., 1973, 80, 252–283CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Palermo, D.S.Is a scientific revolution taking place in psychology? Sci.Studies., 1971, 1, 135–155CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richelle, M.Formal analysis and functional analysis of verbal behaviour: Notes of the debate between Chomsky and Skinner. Behaviourism, 76, 4, 209Google Scholar
Rosenthal, T.L. and Reese, S.L.The effects of covert and overt modeling on assertive behaviour. B.R.A.T., 1976, 14, 463–469Google Scholar
Segal, E.F.Psycholinguistics discovers the operant: A review of Roger Brown's A first language: The early stages. J.E.A.B., 1975, 23, 149–158Google Scholar
Segal, E.M. and Lachman, R.Complex behaviour or higher mental processes: IS there a paradigm shift? Am. Psy., 1972, 27, 46–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seligman, M.E.P. Phobias and preparedness. In Seligman, M.E.P. and Hager, J.L. (Eds.), Biological Boundaries of learning. New York: Appleton-Century-Croft, 1972Google Scholar
Shimp, C.P.Organisation in memory and behaviour. JEAB, 1976, 26, 113–130Google Scholar
Skinner, B.F.The operational analysis of psychological terms. Psy.Rev., 1945, 52, 270–277CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skinner, B.F.Are theories of learning necessary? Psy.Rev., 1950, 57, 193–216CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Skinner, B.F.Beyond freedom and dignity. New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1971Google Scholar
Skinner, B.F.About behaviourism. New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1974Google Scholar
Somekh, D. and Wilding, J.Perception without awareness in a dichoptic viewing condition. Br.J.Psy., 1973, 64, 338–349Google Scholar
Suinn, R.M. and Richardson, F.Anxiety management training: A non-specific behaviour therapy programme for anxiety control. Beh.Ther., 1971, 2, 498CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Suppes, P.S-R theory of finite automata. J.Math.Psy., 1969, 6, 327–355CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wason, P.C. On the failure to eliminate hypotheses: A second look. In Wason, P.C. and Johnson-Laird, P.N. (Eds.), Thinking and reasoning. London: Penguin, 1969Google Scholar
Watsom, J.B.Behaviourism. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press, 1924Google Scholar
Watts, F.N.What sort of cognitive processes are involved in cognitive behaviour therapy? Beyond Mahoney. B.A.B.P. Bull., 1977, 5, 21–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wisocki, P.A.Instructions, exposure, rehearsal and feedback as elements in imagery-based procedures. Behaviourism, 1976, 4, 189–193Google Scholar
Zuriff, G.E.Stimulus equivalence, grammar and internal structure. Behaviourism, 1976, 4, 43–52Google Scholar
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.