Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T02:50:25.040Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Psychometric properties of the Cognitive Behaviour Therapy Scale for Children and Young People (CBTS-CYP) in a Turkish sample

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 May 2022

Vahdet Gormez Open the ORCID record for Vahdet Gormez [Opens in a new window] ,
Süleyman Çakıroğlu ,
Alperen Bıkmazer  and
Paul Stallard
Vahdet Gormez*
Affiliation:
Istanbul Medeniyet University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Kadıköy, Istanbul, Turkey
Süleyman Çakıroğlu
Affiliation:
Istanbul Medeniyet University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Kadıköy, Istanbul, Turkey
Alperen Bıkmazer
Affiliation:
Istanbul Medeniyet University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Kadıköy, Istanbul, Turkey
Paul Stallard
Affiliation:
Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, Department for Health, University of Bath, Bath, UK
*
*Corresponding author. Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Background:

Cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) training is highly demanded by clinicians; however, a standardized competence assessment for professionals working with children and young people (CYP) can be problematic. Psychometric tools used for this purpose are typically adult oriented measures.

Aim:

The present study provides psychometric properties of the Cognitive Behaviour Therapy Scale for Children and Young People (CBTS-CYP) derived from a comparative analysis with the Cognitive Therapy Scale (CTS).

Method:

The CBTS-CYP was used alongside CTS in a CBT supervision training course, consisting of a cohort of 51 therapists. A total of 36 audio/video recorded full CBT sessions were assessed for the purpose of determining CBT competence and adherence to the theory and model. The training involved a total of 80 hours of supervision in 10 meetings via an online videoconferencing platform between July 2020 and February 2021.

Results:

Face validity and inter-rater reliability of CBTS-CYP were high, with the intraclass correlation values being good (0.60–0.74) or excellent (0.74 and above); the correlations of each CBTS-CYP and CTS items were significant; internal consistency of the scale showed that Cronbach alpha values for total-scale and its two subdimensions were above .93. For a cut-off score of 55 out of 90, sensitivity reached 90.73% and specificity 90.73%. A score of 2 points or above from any single item could be considered as the second minimum criterion for competence.

Conclusions:

CBTS-CYP offers a valid and reliable scale to evaluate the competence and adherence quality of CBT sessions with children and adolescents.

Keywords

behavioural cognitive therapychildren and adolescentstherapist competence
Type
Main
Information
Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy , Volume 50 , Issue 4 , July 2022 , pp. 418 - 428
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the British Association for Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapies

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Affrunti, N. W., & Creed, T. A. (2019). The factor structure of the Cognitive Therapy Rating Scale (CTRS) in a sample of community mental health clinicians. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 43, 642–655.10.1007/s10608-019-09998-7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barber, J. P., Liese, B. S., & Abrams, M. J. (2003). Development of the cognitive therapy adherence and competence scale. Psychotherapy Research, 13, 205–221.10.1093/ptr/kpg019CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blackburn, I.-M., James, I. A., Milne, D. L., Baker, C., Standart, S., Garland, A., & Reichelt, F. K. (2001). The revised Cognitive Therapy Scale (CTS-R): psychometric properties. Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy, 29, 431–446.10.1017/S1352465801004040CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Borkovec, T. D., Newman, M. G., Pincus, A. L., & Lytle, R. (2002). A component analysis of cognitive-behavioral therapy for generalized anxiety disorder and the role of interpersonal problems. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 70, 288.10.1037/0022-006X.70.2.288CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Butler, A. C., Chapman, J. E., Forman, E. M., & Beck, A. T. (2006). The empirical status of cognitive-behavioral therapy: a review of meta-analyses. Clinical Psychology Review, 26, 17–31.10.1016/j.cpr.2005.07.003CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fairburn, C. G., & Cooper, Z. (2011). Therapist competence, therapy quality, and therapist training. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 49, 373–378.10.1016/j.brat.2011.03.005CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Friedberg, R. (2014). Training matters: the importance of delivering authentic CBT with youth. Journal of Psychology and Clinical Psychiatry, 1, 47.10.15406/jpcpy.2014.01.00047CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fuggle, P., Dunsmuir, S., & Curry, V. (2012). CBT with Children, Young People and Families. Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Goldberg, S. B., Baldwin, S. A., Merced, K., Caperton, D. D., Imel, Z. E., Atkins, D. C., & Creed, T. (2020). The structure of competence: evaluating the factor structure of the Cognitive Therapy Rating Scale. Behavior Therapy, 51, 113–122.10.1016/j.beth.2019.05.008CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hofmann, S. G., Asnaani, A., Vonk, I. J., Sawyer, A. T., & Fang, A. (2012). The efficacy of cognitive behavioral therapy: a review of meta-analyses. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 36, 427–440.10.1007/s10608-012-9476-1CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
James, I., Blackburn, I., & Reichelt, F. (2001). Manual of the revised Cognitive Therapy Scale. Unpublished manuscript, Newcastle Cognitive and Behavioural Therapies Centre, Newcastle, UK.Google Scholar
Kazantzis, N., Clayton, X., Cronin, T., Farchione, D., Limburg, K., & Dobson, K. (2018). The cognitive therapy scale and cognitive therapy scale-revised as measures of therapist competence in cognitive behavior therapy for depression: relations with short and long term outcome. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 42, 385–397.10.1007/s10608-018-9919-4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keen, A. J., & Freeston, M. H. (2008). Assessing competence in cognitive-behavioural therapy. British Journal of Psychiatry, 193, 60–64.10.1192/bjp.bp.107.038588CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McGlinchey, J. B., & Dobson, K. S. (2003). Treatment integrity concerns in cognitive therapy for depression. Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy, 17, 299–318.10.1891/jcop.17.4.299.52543CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, G. E. (1990). The assessment of clinical skills/competence/performance. Academic Medicine, 65, S63–67.10.1097/00001888-199009000-00045CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Muse, K., & McManus, F. (2013). A systematic review of methods for assessing competence in cognitive-behavioural therapy. Clinical Psychology Review, 33, 484–499.10.1016/j.cpr.2013.01.010CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Roth, A., & Pilling, S. (2007). The competences required to deliver effective cognitive and behavioural therapy for people with depression and with anxiety disorders. London, UK: Department of Health.Google Scholar
Roth, A. D., & Pilling, S. (2008). Using an evidence-based methodology to identify the competences required to deliver effective cognitive and behavioural therapy for depression and anxiety disorders. Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy, 36, 129–147.10.1017/S1352465808004141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shrout, P. E., & Fleiss, J. L. (1979). Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychological Bulletin, 86, 420.10.1037/0033-2909.86.2.420CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stallard, P. (2020). A Clinician’s Guide to CBT for Children to Young Adults: A Companion to Think Good, Feel Good and Thinking Good, Feeling Better. John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Stallard, P., Myles, P., & Branson, A. (2014). The cognitive behaviour therapy scale for children and young people (CBTS-CYP): development and psychometric properties. Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy, 42, 269–282.10.1017/S135246581300115XCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Young, J., & Beck, A. T. (1980). Cognitive Therapy Scale: Rating Manual. Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Gormez et al. supplementary material

Table S1

Download Gormez et al. supplementary material(File)
File 16.8 KB
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.