Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T00:20:03.141Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Psychometric properties of Persian version of Cognitive Behavioural Avoidance Scale: results from student, general population and clinical samples in Iran

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 May 2020

Reza Moloodi Open the ORCID record for Reza Moloodi [Opens in a new window] ,
Keith Dobson ,
Ladan Fata ,
Abbas Pourshahbaz ,
Parvaneh Mohammadkhani ,
Fereshteh Mootabi ,
Maryam Kami ,
Kaveh Ziai  and
Ata Ghaderi
Reza Moloodi*
Affiliation:
Substance Abuse and Dependence Research Center, University of Social Welfare and Rehabilitation Sciences, Tehran, Iran
Keith Dobson
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada
Ladan Fata
Affiliation:
Medical Education and Development Center, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
Abbas Pourshahbaz
Affiliation:
Department of Clinical Psychology, University of Social Welfare and Rehabilitation Sciences, Tehran, Iran
Parvaneh Mohammadkhani
Affiliation:
Department of Clinical Psychology, University of Social Welfare and Rehabilitation Sciences, Tehran, Iran
Fereshteh Mootabi
Affiliation:
Family Research Institute, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran
Maryam Kami
Affiliation:
Department of Clinical Psychology, University of Social Welfare and Rehabilitation Sciences, Tehran, Iran
Kaveh Ziai
Affiliation:
Private Practice, Tehran, Iran
Ata Ghaderi
Affiliation:
Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden
*
*Corresponding author. Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Background:

There is no published evidence about the psychometric properties of the Cognitive Behavioral Avoidance Scale (CBAS) in Eastern cultures.

Aims:

The current research evaluated the psychometric properties of a Persian version of the CBAS.

Method:

The research consisted of two studies. In Study 1, a university student sample (n = 702) completed the CBAS, the Beck Depression Inventory-II, the Thought Control Questionnaire and the Anxious Thoughts Inventory. In Study 2, a general population sample (n = 384) and a clinical sample (n = 152) completed the CBAS, the Young Compensation Inventory and the Depression, Anxiety, Stress Scale-21.

Results:

Exploratory factor analysis of the data from Study 1 suggested a four-factor solution for CBAS. The CBAS had acceptable internal consistency and test–re-test reliability, and showed significant correlations with depression symptoms and anxious thoughts. Confirmatory factor analysis of the data from Study 2 indicated good fit between the four-factor model and data. The CBAS had a significant relationship with depression, anxiety and stress symptoms, but no associations with schema compensatory behaviour strategy. Finally, the CBAS and its subscales successfully distinguished a clinical sample from a general population sample.

Conclusions:

The findings provide preliminary evidence for reliability and validity of the CBAS among Iranian student, general population and clinical samples.

Keywords

Cognitive Behavioral Avoidance ScaleIranpsychometric properties
Type
Main
Information
Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy , Volume 48 , Issue 6 , November 2020 , pp. 705 - 716
Copyright
© British Association for Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapies 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Arbuckle, J. L. (2014). Amos (version 23.0). Chicago, USA: IBM SPSS.Google Scholar
Asghari Moghaddam, M. A., Saed, F., Dibajnia, P., & Zangeneh, J. (2008). A preliminary validation of the Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scales (DASS) in a non-clinical sample. Clinical Psychology & Personality, 1, 23–38. [in Persian]Google Scholar
Ataie, S., Fata, L., & Ahmadi Abhari, A. (2014). Rumination and cognitive behavioral avoidance in Depressive and Social Anxiety Disorders: comparison between dimensional and categorical approaches. Iranian Journal of Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology, 19, 283–295. [in Persian]Google Scholar
Barlow, D. H., Allen, L. B., & Choate, M. L. (2016). Toward a unified treatment for emotional disorders – republished article. Behavior Therapy, 47, 838–853. https://doi.org.10.1016/j.beth.2016.11.005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barlow, D. H., & Farchione, T. J. (2017). Applications of the Unified Protocol for Transdiagnostic Treatment of Emotional Disorders. New York, USA: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beck, A. T., Steer, R. A., & Brown, G. K. (1996). Beck Depression Inventory-II Manual. San Antonio, TX, USA: The Psychological Corporation.Google Scholar
Boelen, P. A., & Eisma, M. C. (2015). Anxious and depressive avoidance behavior in post-loss psychopathology: a longitudinal study. Anxiety, Stress, & Coping, 28, 587–600. https://doi.org.10.1080/10615806.2015.1004054CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brockmeyer, T., Kulessa, D., Hautzinger, M., Bents, H., & Backenstrass, M. (2015). Differentiating early-onset chronic depression from episodic depression in terms of cognitive-behavioral and emotional avoidance. Journal of Affective Disorders, 175, 418–423. https://doi.org.10.1016/j.jad.2015.01.045CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Çakir, Z. (2016). Sıkıntıya Toleranssızlık Ölçeği ve Bilişsel-Davranışsal Kaçınma Ölçeğinin psikometrik özelliklerinin incelenmesi. Anatolian Journal of Psychiatry /Anadolu Psikiyatri Dergisi, 17, 24–32. https://doi.org.10.5455/apd.207723Google Scholar
Dobson, D. J. G., & Dobson, K. S. (2018). Evidence-Based Practice of Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy (2nd edn). New York, USA: Guilford Publications.Google Scholar
Fata, L., Moutabi, F., Moloodi, R., & Ziai, K. (2010). Psychometric properties of Persian version of thought control questionnaire and anxious thought inventory in Iranian students. Journal of Psychological Models and Methods, 1, 81–104. [in Persian]Google Scholar
Harris, R. (2019). ACT Made Simple: An Easy-to-Read Primer on Acceptance and Commitment Therapy. New Harbinger Publications.Google Scholar
Hernández-Guzmán, L., Dobson, K. S., Caso-Niebla, J., González-Montesinos, M., Epp, A., Arratíbel-Siles, M. L., & Wierzbicka-Szymczak, E. (2009). La versión en español de la Escala Cognitivo-Conductual de Evitación (CBAS). Revista Latinoamericana de Psicología, 41, 99–108.Google Scholar
Hofmann, S. G., & Hay, A. C. (2018). Rethinking avoidance: toward a balanced approach to avoidance in treating anxiety disorders. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 55, 14–21. https://doi.org.10.1016/j.janxdis.2018.03.004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
IBM Corporation (2016). IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, version 24.0. Armonk, NY, USA: IBM Corp.Google Scholar
LuKaraosmanoglu, H. A., Soygut, G., & Kabul, A. (2013). Psychometric properties of the Turkish Young Compensation Inventory. Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, 20, 171–179. https://doi.org.10.1002/cpp.787CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levin, M. E., Krafft, J., Pierce, B., & Potts, S. (2018). When is experiential avoidance harmful in the moment? Examining global experiential avoidance as a moderator. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 61, 158–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbtep.2018.07.005CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McElroy, E., Casey, P., Adamson, G., Filippopoulos, P., & Shevlin, M. (2018). A comprehensive analysis of the factor structure of the Beck Depression Inventory-II in a sample of outpatients with adjustment disorder and depressive episode. Irish Journal of Psychological Medicine, 35, 53–61. https://doi.org.10.1017/ipmCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moloodi, R., Pourshahbaz, A., Mohammadkhani, P., Fata, L., & Ghaderi, A. (2017). Psychometric properties of the Persian version of Clinical Perfectionism Questionnaire: findings from a clinical and non-clinical sample in Iran. Personality and Individual Differences, 119, 141–146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2017.07.003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moos, R. H., & Schaefer, J. A. (1993). Coping resources and processes: current concepts and measures. In Goldberger, L. & Breznitz, S. (eds), Handbook of Stress: Theoretical and Clinical Aspects (2nd edn, pp. 234–257). New York, USA: Free Press.Google Scholar
Ottenbreit, N. D., & Dobson, K. S. (2004). Avoidance and depression: the construction of the Cognitive Behavioral Avoidance Scale. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 42, 293–313. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0005-7967(03)00140-2CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ottenbreit, N. D., Dobson, K. S., & Quigley, L. (2014a). A psychometric evaluation of the cognitive-behavioral avoidance scale in women with major depressive disorder. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 36, 591–599. doi: 10.1007/s10862-014-9416-3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ottenbreit, N. D., Dobson, K. S., & Quigley, L. (2014b). An examination of avoidance in major depression in comparison to social anxiety disorder. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 56, 82–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brat.2014.03.005CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Quigley, L., Wen, A., & Dobson, K. S. (2017). Avoidance and depression vulnerability: an examination of avoidance in remitted and currently depressed individuals. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 97, 183–188. https://doi.org.10.1016/j.brat.2017.07.015CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rochefort, C., Baldwin, A. S., & Chmielewski, M. (2018). Experiential avoidance: an examination of the construct validity of the AAQ-II and MEAQ. Behavior Therapy, 49, 435–449. https://doi.org.10.1016/j.beth.2017.08.008CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Röthlin, P., Grosse Holtforth, M., Bergomi, C., Berking, M., Ottenbreit, N. D., & Caspar, F. (2010). Vermeidung und Depression. Diagnostica, 56, 46–55. https://doi.org.10.1026/0012-1924/a000008CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scholten, S., Velten, J., Bieda, A., Zhang, X. C., & Margraf, J. (2017). Testing measurement invariance of the Depression, Anxiety, and Stress Scales (DASS-21) across four countries. Psychological Assessment, 29, 1376. https://doi.org.10.1037/pas0000440CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sundag, J., Zens, C., Ascone, L., Thome, S., & Lincoln, T. M. (2018). Are schemas passed on? A study on the association between early maladaptive schemas in parents and their offspring and the putative translating mechanisms. Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy, 46, 738–753. https://doi.org.10.1017/S1352465818000073CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Toosi, F., Rahimi, C., & Sajjadi, S. (2017). Psychometric properties of beck depression inventory-II for high school children in Shiraz City, Iran. International Journal of School Health, 4. https://doi.org.10.5812/intjsh.41069Google Scholar
Vandromme, H., Raes, F., Defranc, A., & Hermans, D. (2007). De Cognitive-Behavioral Avoidance Scale (CBAS-NL): Een vragenlijst voor vermijdingsgedrag bij depressie. Gedragstherapie, 40, 285–301.Google Scholar
von Glischinski, M., von Brachel, R., & Hirschfeld, G. (2019). How depressed is ‘depressed’? A systematic review and diagnostic meta-analysis of optimal cut points for the Beck Depression Inventory revised (BDI-II). Quality of Life Research, 28, 1111–1118. https://doi.org.10.1007/s11136-018-2050-xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wheaton, M. G., & Pinto, A. (2019). Transdiagnostic Factors in Obsessive-Compulsive Personality Disorder. In Fontenelle, L. F. & Yücel, M. (eds), A Transdiagnostic Approach to Obsessions, Compulsions and Related Phenomena (pp. 345–356). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org.10.1016/j.addbeh.2016.11.021Google Scholar
Wells, A. (1994). A multi-dimensional measure of worry: development and preliminary validation of the anxious thoughts inventory. Anxiety, Stress, and Coping, 6, 289–299. https://doi.org.10.1080/10615809408248803CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wells, A., & Davies, M. I. (1994). The thought control questionnaire: a measure of individual differences in the control of unwanted thoughts. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 32, 871–878. https://doi.org.10.1016/0005-7967(94)90168-6CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Young, J. E., Klosko, J. S., & Weishaar, M. E. (2003). Schema Therapy: A Practitioner’s Guide. Guilford Publications.Google Scholar
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.