Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-4rdrl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-04T19:15:40.207Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Organizing Staff to Promote Purposeful Activity in a Setting for Mentally Handicapped Adults: an Evaluation of Alternative Strategies—Small Groups and Room Management

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 June 2009

A. G. Crisp  and
P. Sturmey
A. G. Crisp
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Liverpool
P. Sturmey
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Liverpool
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In a hospital training unit for severely mentally handicapped adults, alternative methods of staff organization, Room Management (RM) and Small Groups (SG) were experimentally evaluated. Both procedures were found to be equivalent in ensuring that trainees had materials available to them, in promoting on-task behaviour and staff trainee interaction and minimizing staff–staff interaction. Group engagement was significantly higher during the SG condition. Room Management was nevertheless significantly more successful in facilitating individual training than the SG arrangement, trainees receiving four times more individual training during RM than SG.

The implications of these results for the appropriate use of training staff are discussed. The use of group engagement as a dependent variable is critically evaluated.

Type
Research Article
Information
Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy , Volume 12 , Issue 4 , October 1984 , pp. 281 - 299
Copyright
Copyright © British Association for Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapies 1984

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adams, G. L., Matlock, B. L. and Tallon, R. (1981). An analysis of social praise given during the correction procedure of skill training. American Journal of Mental Deficiency 85, 652–654.Google ScholarPubMed
Alberto, P., Jobes, N., Sizemore, A. and Doran, D. A. (1980). A comparison of individual and group instruction across response tasks. Journal of the Association for the Severely Handicapped 5, 285–293.Google Scholar
Baumeister, A. A. (1967). Problems in comparative studies of mental retardates and normals. American Journal of Mental Deficiency 71, 869–875.Google Scholar
Bijou, S. W. (1966). A functional analysis of retarded development. In International Review of Research in Mental Retardation (Vol. 1), Ellis, N. R. (Ed.), New York: Academic Press, pp. 1–20.Google Scholar
Bijou, S. W. and Dunitz-Johnson, E. (1981). Interbehaviour analysis of developmental retardation. The Psychological Record 31, 305–329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bush, A., Williams, J. and Morris, S. (1980). An activity period for the mentally handicapped: a pilot study to investigate ways of increasing patient participation in an occupational therapy department, within existing staff ratios. British Journal of Occupational Therapy 43, 297–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, J. (1968). Weighted Kappa: nominal scale agreement with provision for scale agreement or partial credit. Psychological Bulleting 70, 213–220.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cone, J. D. (1977). The relevance of reliability and validity for behavioural assessment. Behaviour Therapy 8, 411–426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dalgleish, M. and Matthews, R. (1981). Some effects of staffing levels and group size on the quality of day care for severely mentally handicapped adults. British Journal of Mental Subnormality 27, 30–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doll, E. A. (1947). Vineland Social Maturity Scale: Manual of Directions. Philadelphia: Educational Publishers.Google Scholar
Favell, J. E. and Cannon, P. R. (1976). Evaluation of entertainment materials for severely retarded persons. American Journal of Mental Deficiency 81, 357–361.Google Scholar
Favell, J. E., Favell, J. E. and McGinsey, J. F. (1978). Relative effectiveness and efficiency of group vs. individual training of severely retarded persons. American Journal of Mental Deficiency 83, 104–109.Google ScholarPubMed
Fink, W. and Sandall, S. (1978). One-to-one versus group academic instruction with handicapped and non-handicapped pre-school children. Mental Retardation 16, 236–240.Google Scholar
Fink, W. and Sandall, S. A. (1980). A comparison of one-to-one and small group instructional strategies with developmentally delayed pre-schoolers. Mental Retardation 18, 34–35.Google Scholar
Grant, G. W. B. and Moores, B. (1977). Resident characteristics and staff behaviour in two hospitals for mentally retarded adults. American Journal of Mental Deficiency 82, 259–265.Google ScholarPubMed
Gunzburg, H. C. (1977). Progress Assessment Chart of Social and Personal Development. Manual. Volume I. 5th Edit., Stratford-upon-Avon: S.E.F.A. Publications.Google Scholar
Harter, S., Brown, L. and Zigler, E. (1971). Discrimination learning in retarded and non-retarded children as a function of task difficulty and social reinforcement. American Journal of Mental Deficiency 76, 275–283.Google Scholar
Herbert-Jackson, E., O'Brien, M., Porterfield, J. and Risley, T. (1977). The Infant Centre. Baltimore, Ma: University of Park Press.Google Scholar
Houts, P. S. and Scott, R. A. (1975). Goal planning with developmentally delayed persons: procedures for developing an individualised client plan. Pennsylvania State University Department of Behavioural Science.Google Scholar
Hutt, S. J. and Hutt, C. (1970). Direct Observation and Measurement of Behaviour. Springfield, Il: Charles C. Thomas.Google Scholar
Kazdin, A. E. (1976). Statistical analysis for single-case experimental designs. In Single Case Experimental Design, Hersen, S. H. and Barlow, D. H. (Eds), New York: Pergamon, pp. 27–43.Google Scholar
Kelly, B., Holland, J. and Webster, J. (1982). The Douglas Ward activity project. Mental Handicap 10, 16–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelly, M. P. and May, D. (1982). Good and bad patients: a review of the literature and a theoretical critique. Journal of Advanced Nursing 7, 147–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mansell, J., Felce, D., Jenkins, J. and DeKock, U. (1982a). Increasing staff ratios in an activity with severely mentally handicapped people. British Journal of Mental Subnormality 28, 97–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mansell, J., Felce, D., DeKock, U. and Jenkins, J. (1982b). Increasing purposeful activity of severely and profoundly mentally handicapped adults. Behaviour Research and Therapy 20, 593–604.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McBrien, J. and Weightman, J. (1980). The effect of room management procedures on engagement of profoundly handicapped children. British Journal of Mental Subnormality 26, 38–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nand, R. S. (1980). Organisation of activity periods for profoundly mentally handicapped adults. Nursing Times 9 10, 1807–1809.Google Scholar
Perrow, C. (1972). Complex Organisations. Glenview, Il: Scott Freeman.Google Scholar
Podsakoff, P. M. (1982). Determinants of a supervisor's use of rewards and punishments: a literature review and suggestions for further research. Organisational Behaviour and Human Performance 29, 58–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Porterfield, J. and Blunden, R. (1978). Establishing an activity period and individual skill training within a day setting for profoundly mentally handicapped adults. Journal of Practical Approaches to Developmental Handicaps 2, 10–15.Google Scholar
Porterfield, J., Blunden, R. and Blewitt, E. (1980). Improving environments for profoundly handicapped adults. Behaviour Modification 4, 225–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raynes, N. W., Pratt, M. W. and Roses, S. C. (1979). Organisational Structure and the Care of the Mentally Retarded. London: Croome Helm.Google Scholar
Storm, R. and Willis, J. (1978). Small group training as an alternative to individual programs for profoundly retarded persons. American Journal of Mental Deficiency 83, 283–288.Google ScholarPubMed
Sturmey, P. and Crisp, A. G. (1982). Improving environments for the mentally handicapped: a methodological note. British Journal of Clinical Psychology 21, 221–222.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thormalen, P. W. (1965). A study of on-the-ward training of trainable mentally retarded children in a state institution. California Mental Health Monograph No. 4.Google Scholar
Tizard, J. (1964). Community Services for the Mentally Handicapped. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Tyler, S. (1979). Time sampling: a matter of convention. Animal Behaviour 27, 801–810.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walters, A. (1978). Intervention strategies with a group of profoundly mentally handicapped adults. Unpublished Diploma Thesis, British Psychological Society.Google Scholar
Warren, S. A. and Monday, L. N. (1971). To what behaviours do attending adults respond? American Journal of Mental Deficiency 75, 449–455.Google ScholarPubMed
Westling, D., Ferrell, K. and Swensen, K. (1982). Intraclass comparison of two arrangements for teaching profoundly mentally retarded children. American Journal of Mental Deficiency 86, 601–608.Google Scholar
Wright, E. C., Abbas, K. A. and Meredith, C. (1973). A study of the interaction between nursing staff and profoundly retarded children. British Journal of Mental Subnormality 20, 38–41.Google Scholar
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.