Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T22:57:04.619Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Internet-Based Self-Help Training for Children and Adolescents with Recurrent Headache: A Pilot Study

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 April 2008

Ellen Trautmann*
Affiliation:
University of Göttingen, Germany
Birgit Kröner-Herwig
Affiliation:
University of Göttingen, Germany
*
Reprint requests to Ellen Trautmann, Department of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, University of Göttingen, Goßlerstrasse 14, 37073 Göttingen, Germany. E-mail: [email protected] An extended version is also available online in the table of contents for this issue: http://journals.cambridge.org/jid_BCP

Abstract

We report the results of a randomized controlled trial that compared the efficacy of an internet-based self-help treatment for paediatric headache including chat communication (cognitive-behavioural treatment, CBT) with an internet-based psychoeducation intervention (EDU). In the CBT group, significant pre- to post-treatment decreases were found for headache frequency and pain catastrophizing, but not for headache intensity or duration. In the EDU group none of the variables (frequency, intensity, duration, pain catastrophizing) showed improvement. No significant between group differences were found for headache variables and pain catastrophizing at post-treatment. The patients reported high satisfaction with the internet-based training and a good patient-trainer-alliance. Results were maintained at 6-month follow-up. Due to the small sample size, no general conclusions can be drawn regarding the efficacy of the internet-based training regarding the outcome variables, but the training was well accepted by patients. Further research is necessary to evaluate the therapeutic potential of such interventions.

Type
Brief Clinical Reports
Copyright
Copyright © British Association for Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapies 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Crombez, G., Bijttebier, P., Ecclestone, C., Mascagni, T., Mertens, G., Goubert, L. and Vertraeten, K. (2003). The child versions of the pain catastrophizing scale (PCS- C): preliminary validation. Pain, 104, 639646.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hicks, C. L., Baeyer, C. L. and McGrath, P. J. (2004). Online psychological treatment for pediatric recurrent pain: a randomized evaluation. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 31, 724736.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krampen, G. and Wald, B. (2001). Kurzinstrumente für die Prozessevaluation und adaptive Indikation in der Allgemeinen und Differentiellen Psychotherapie und Beratung. Diagnostica, 47, 4350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kröner-Herwig, B. and Denecke, H. (2002). Cognitive-behavioural therapy of paediatric headache. Are there any differences in efficacy between a therapist-administered group training and a self-help format? Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 53, 11071114.Google Scholar
Sillanpää, M. and Aro, H. (2000). Headache in teenagers: comorbidity and prognosis. Functional Neurology, 15, 116121.Google ScholarPubMed
Supplementary material: File

Trautmann extended report

Trautmann extended report

Download Trautmann extended report(File)
File 104.4 KB
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.