Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-05T14:17:06.762Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Incentive to Suppress a Neutral Thought

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 June 2009

Hélène Letarte ,
Robert Ladouceur ,
Mark Freeston  and
Josée Rhéaume
Hélène Letarte
Affiliation:
Université Laval, Québec
Robert Ladouceur
Affiliation:
Université Laval, Québec
Mark Freeston
Affiliation:
Université Laval, Québec
Josée Rhéaume
Affiliation:
Université Laval, Québec
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A suppression-mention task was used to evaluate the influence of increasing the incentive to suppress on subsequent enhancement and/or rebound effects. The experimental group suppressed neutral thoughts with a financial incentive for performance. A bogus pipeline was used to control for honesty. Two control groups, one with the bogus pipeline and one without, were asked to suppress the thought without the possibility of financial reward contingent on performance. Results showed that the group with a possible financial reward, although more successful in suppressing the thought, were still unable to suppress the thought. No enhancement or rebound effects were observed.

Type
Research Article
Information
Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy , Volume 25 , Issue 3 , July 1997 , pp. 219 - 229
Copyright
Copyright © British Association for Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapies 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aguinis, H.Pierce, C., & Quigley, B.M. (1993). Conditions under which a bogus pipeline procedure enhances the validity of self-reported cigarette smoking: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 23, 352–373.Google Scholar
Clark, D. A. & Purdon, C. (1993). New perspectives for a cognitive theory of obsessions. Australian Psychologist, 28, 161–167.Google Scholar
Clark, D. M., Ball, S., & Pape, D. (1991). An experimental investigation of thought suppression. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 29, 253–257.Google Scholar
Clark, D. M., Winton, E., & Thynn, L. (1993). A further experimental investigation of thought suppression. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 31, 207–210.Google Scholar
Freeston, M. H., Rhéaume, J., & Ladouceur, R. (1996). Correcting faulty appraisals of obsessive thoughts. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 34, 443–446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaboury, A. & Ladouceur, R. (1989). Erroneous perceptions and gambling. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 4, 411–420.Google Scholar
Jones, E. E. & Sigall, H. (1971). The bogus pipeline: A new paradigm for measuring affect and attitude. Psychological Bulletin, 76, 349–364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirk, R. E. (1968). Experimental design. Belmont, CA: Brooks/Cole.Google Scholar
Lavy, E. H. & Van Den Hout, M. A. (1990). Thought suppression induces intrusions. Behavioural Psychotherapy, 18, 251–258.Google Scholar
Merckelbach, H., Muris, P., Van Den Hout, M., & De Jong, P. (1991). Rebound effects of thought suppression: Instruction-dependent? Behavioural Psychotherapy, 19, 225–238.Google Scholar
Muris, M., Merckelbach, H., & Horselenberg, R. (1996). Individual differences in thought suppression. The White Bear Suppression Inventory: factor structure, reliability validity and correlates. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 34, 501–504.Google Scholar
Muris, P., Merckelbach, H., Van Den Hout, M., & De Jong, P. (1992). Suppression of emotional and neutral material. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 30, 639–642.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Roese, N. J. & Jamieson, D. W. (1993). Twenty years of bogus pipeline research: A critical review and meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 114, 363–373.Google Scholar
Rutledge, P. C., Hancock, R. A., & Rutledge, J. H. (1996). Predictors of thought rebound. Behaviour Research and Therapy 34, 555–562.Google Scholar
Salkovskis, P. M. (1985). Obsessional-compulsive problems: A cognitive-behavioural analysis. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 23, 571–583.Google Scholar
Salkovskis, P. M. (1989). Obsessions and compulsions. In Scott, J., Williams, J. M. G. & Beck, A. T. (Eds.), Cognitive therapy: A clinical casebook, (pp. 52–77). London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
Salkovskis, P. M. (1996). Cognitive-behavioural approaches to the understanding of obsessional problems. In Rapee, R. (Ed.), Current controversies in the anxiety disorders. New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
Sigall, H. & Page, R. (1972). Reducing attenuation in the expression of interpersonal affect via the bogus pipeline. Sociometry, 35, 629–642.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tabachnick, B. G. & Fiddell, L. S. (1989). Using multivariate statistics (2nd ed.). New York: Harper Collins.Google Scholar
Wegner, D. M. & Erber, R. (1992). The hyperaccessibility of suppressed thoughts. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 1–10.Google Scholar
Wegner, D. M. & Zanakos, S. (1994). People who try not to think: The trait of thought suppression. Journal of Personality, 62, 615–640.Google Scholar
Wegner, D. M., Schneider, D. J., Carter, S. R., & White, T. L. (1987) Paradoxical effects of thought suppression. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 5–13.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.