Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T11:10:19.920Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Further Validation of a Chinese Version of the Obsessive-Compulsive Inventory-Revised

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 June 2012

Gregory S. Chasson ,
Suqin Tang ,
Bradley Gray ,
Hongwei Sun  and
Jianping Wang
Gregory S. Chasson
Affiliation:
Towson University, USA
Suqin Tang
Affiliation:
Beijing Normal University, China
Bradley Gray
Affiliation:
Towson University, USA
Hongwei Sun
Affiliation:
Weifang Medical University, China
Jianping Wang*
Affiliation:
Beijing Normal University, China
*
Reprint requests to Jianping Wang, School of Psychology, Beijing Normal University, No. 19 Xinjiekouwai Street, Haidian District, Beijing, 100875, P. R. China. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Background: There has been an increased effort to understand the nature of obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) in non-Western cultures. In particular, growing research has examined OCD in China, but there are no comprehensive instruments that measure both OCD severity and heterogeneity for characterizing samples. Aims: A validated, comprehensive measure that could be used in China would provide researchers with a useful instrument for evaluating severity and heterogeneity of OCD in a non-Western culture, allowing researchers to better understand the universal and cultural components that play a role in the nature of OCD. Method: The current investigation presents data on the reliability and validity of a Mandarin translation of the Obsessive-Compulsive Inventory-Revised (CH-OCI) using both a student (n = 1950) and clinical sample (n = 50 patients with OCD; n = 50 patients with anxiety as a comparison group). Results: Results support the factor structure, convergent and discriminant validity, criterion-related validity, test-retest reliability, and internal consistency of the CH-OCI. Conclusions: Validation of the instrument permits researchers and clinicians to measure OCD presentation in Mandarin-speaking samples.

Keywords

Obsessive-compulsive disorderobsessive-compulsive symptomsOCDObsessive-Compulsive Inventory-RevisedOCD subtypesChinaNon-Western
Type
Brief Clinical Reports
Information
Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy , Volume 41 , Issue 2 , March 2013 , pp. 249 - 254
Copyright
Copyright © British Association for Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapies 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

American Psychiatric Association (2000). Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders: DSM-IV-TR. Washington, DC: APA.Google Scholar
Foa, E. B., Huppert, J. D., Leiberg, S., Langner, R., Kichic, R., Hajcak, G., et al. (2002). The obsessive–compulsive inventory: development and validation of a short version. Psychological Assessment, 14, 485–496.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Liu, X. C., Oda, S., Peng, X. and Asai, K. (1997). Life events and anxiety in Chinese medical students. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 32, 63–67.Google Scholar
Peng, Z., Yang, W., Miao, G., Jing, J. and Chan, R. K. (2011). The Chinese version of the Obsessive-Compulsive Inventory-Revised scale: replication and extension to non-clinical and clinical individuals with OCD symptoms. BMC Psychiatry, 11, 129.Google Scholar
Zhang, J., Wu, Z. Y., Fang, G., Li, J., Han, B. X. and Chen, Z. Y. (2010). Development of the Chinese age norms of CESD in urban area. Chinese Mental Health Journal, 24, 139–143.Google Scholar
Zhong, J., Qin, M., Cai, W. J., Tan, J. Q., Wang, Y. Y., Xu, X. J., et al. (2006). Padua inventory for Chinese college students. Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology, 14, 1–4.Google Scholar
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.