Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T14:58:12.572Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Follow-up Study of a Comprehensive Behavioural Treatment Programme for Chronic Pain Patients

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 June 2009

Lennart Melin  and
Steven J. Linton
Lennart Melin
Affiliation:
Department of Clinical Psychology, University of Uppsala, Sweden
Steven J. Linton
Affiliation:
Department of Occupational Medicine Örebro Medical Centre, Örebro, Sweden
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The 28 patients in the Linton et al. (1985) outcome study were contacted for a 20-month follow-up. The follow-up was superimposed on a three-group design consisting of a waiting-list control, a regular treatment group, and a “behavioural” group receiving the regular treatment plus applied relaxation and operant-activities training. Measures similar to the ones used in the original study were employed, in addition to a follow-up questionnaire concerning work, health status, activity level, pain ratings, medicine use, and sleep. Ninety-three per cent of the original patients participated in the follow-up. In general, improvements were maintained by the behavioural group. Specifically, results indicated that the group receiving applied relaxation and operant-activities training had significantly larger improvements with regard to pain and activity at follow-up than the control groups. Moreover, an overall analysis of variance showed that the behavioural group differed significantly from the other two groups. The results definitely suggest that the positive effects of the behavioural programme were maintained at follow-up.

Type
Research Article
Information
Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy , Volume 16 , Issue 4 , October 1988 , pp. 313 - 321
Copyright
Copyright © British Association for Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapies 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aronoff, G. M., Evans, W. O. and Enders, P.L. (1983). A review of follow-up studies of multidisciplinary pain units, Pain 16, 1–11.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Conover, W. J. (1980). Practical Nonparametric Statistics (2nd ed.) New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Fordyce, W. E. (1976). Behavioral Methods for Chronic Pain and Illness. St. Louis: C. V. Mosby.Google Scholar
Keefe, F. J. (1982). Behavioral assessment of chronic pain: current status and future directions. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 53, 896–911.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Linton, S. J. and Melin, L. (1983). Applied relaxation in the management of chronic pain. Behavioural Psychotherapy 11, 337–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Linton, S. J., Melin, L. and Stjernlöf, K. (1985). The effects of applied relaxation and operant activity training on chronic pain. Behavioural Psychotherapy 13, 87–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Melzak, R. (1983). Pain Measurement and Assessment New York, Raven Press.Google Scholar
Turk, D. C. and Genest, M. (1979). Regulation of pain: The application of cognitive and behavioral principles. In (Kendall, P. C. & Hollon, S. D., Eds.) Cognitive-behavioral Intervention: Theory Research, and Procedures. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Turk, D. C., Meichenbaum, D. H. and Berman, W. H. (1979). Application of biofeedback for the regulation of pain: a critical review. Psychological Bulletin 86, 1322–1338.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.