Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T19:24:59.577Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Explanation and Prediction in Functional Analysis: A Reply to Jones and Owens

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 June 2009

Andrew A. McDonnell  and
David M. Samson
Andrew A. McDonnell
Affiliation:
University of Birmingham
David M. Samson
Affiliation:
North Warwickshire Health Authority
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Samson and McDonnell (1990) proposed a definition of the term functional analysis. In a reply to that article, Jones and Owens maintained that Samson and McDonnell had failed to address sufficiently the complexities of this approach, particularly in the use of unobservables in functional analysis and the contextual nature of challenging behaviours. This paper attempts to provide a short reply to these contentions.

Type
Research Article
Information
Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy , Volume 20 , Issue 1 , January 1992 , pp. 41 - 44
Copyright
Copyright © British Association for Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapies 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Haynes, S. N. and O'Brien, W. W. (1990). Functional analysis in behaviour therapy. Clinical Psychology Review 10, 649–668.Google Scholar
Hyland, M. (1981). Introduction to Theoretical Psychology. Hong Kong: Macmillan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iwata, B., Dorsey, M. F., Slifer, K. J., Bauman, K. and Richman, G. S. (1982). Toward a functional analysis of self injury. Analysis and Intervention in Developmental Disabilities 2, 3–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, R. S. P. and Owens, R. G. (1992). Applying functional analysis: a reply to Samson and McDonnell. Behavioural Psychotherapy 20, 37–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kenrick, D. T. and Funder, D. C. (1988). Profiting from the controversy: lessons from the person-situation debate. American Psychologist 43, 23–34.Google Scholar
Lennox, D. B., Miltenberger, R. C., Spengler, P. and Erfanian, N. (1988). Decelerative treatment practices with persons who have mental retardation. American Journal of Mental Retardation 92, 492–501.Google ScholarPubMed
McKay, D. G. (1988). Under what conditions can theoretical psychology survive and prosper? Integrating rational and empirical epistemologies. Psychological Review 95, 559–565.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Repp, A. C., Felce, D. and Barton, L. E. (1988). Basing the treatment of stereotypic and self injurious behaviours on hypotheses of their cause. Journal of Applied Behaviour Analysis 21, 281–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Repp, A. C., Singh, N. N., Olinger, E. and Olson, D. R. (1990). The use of functional analyses to test causes of self injurious behaviour: rationale, current status and future directions. Journal of Mental Deficiency Research 34, 95–105.Google Scholar
Samson, D. M. and McDonnell, A. A. (1990). Functional analysis and challenging behaviours. Behavioural Psychotherapy 18, 259–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, P. A. (1990). Ideas about causation in philosophy and psychology. Psychological Bulletin 108, 3–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.