Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T00:25:30.689Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Distinguishing Cognitive and Somatic Dimensions of State and Trait Anxiety: Development and Validation of the State-Trait Inventory for Cognitive and Somatic Anxiety (STICSA)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 April 2008

Melissa J. Ree ,
Davina French ,
Colin MacLeod  and
Vance Locke
Melissa J. Ree*
Affiliation:
The Marian Centre and the University of Western Australia
Davina French
Affiliation:
The University of Western Australia
Colin MacLeod
Affiliation:
The University of Western Australia
Vance Locke
Affiliation:
The University of Western Australia
*
Reprint requests to Melissa Ree, The Marian Centre, 187 Cambridge Street, Subiaco, Perth, Western Australia 6014, Australia. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

To date, little research has endeavoured to discriminate between cognitive and somatic dimensions of trait anxiety and, consequently, it remains uncertain whether these anxiety dimensions can be reliably distinguished at the trait level. The four studies presented here support the validity of the distinction between cognitive and somatic anxiety at both state and trait levels. The research involved the development and validation of a self-report questionnaire, the State-Trait Inventory for cognitive and somatic anxiety (STICSA). The nature of the anxiety dimensions assessed by this new measure was then investigated. The results indicate that the state scales of this new measure assess the degree of cognitive and somatic anxiety experienced at a particular point in time. The trait scales of the STICSA predict the situations in which different individuals will display elevations in cognitive and somatic state anxiety. Trait cognitive and somatic anxiety are indeed distinct constructs that can be reliably and validly assessed. Theoretical and applied implications of this finding are discussed.

Keywords

State Trait Inventory for Cognitive and Somatic Anxiety (STICSA)questionnaire developmentconfirmatory factor analysistrait anxietystate anxietyassessment
Type
Research Article
Information
Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy , Volume 36 , Issue 3 , May 2008 , pp. 313 - 332
Copyright
Copyright © British Association for Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapies 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Beck, J. G., Shipherd, J. C. and Zebb, B. J. (1996). Fearful responding to repeated CO2 inhalation: a preliminary investigation. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 34, 609–620.Google Scholar
Bedford, A. and Deary, I. J. (1997). The personal disturbance scale (DSSI/SAD): development, use and structure. Personality and Individual Differences, 22, 493–510.Google Scholar
Borkovec, T. D., Robinson, T. P., Pruzinsky, T. and Depree, J. A. (1983). Preliminary exploration of worry: some characteristics and processes. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 21, 9–16.Google Scholar
Busch, H. A., King, P. R. and Guttman, M. A. (1994). Interactional anxiety in an examination situation with French and English high school students: an empirical test of a composite predictor for state anxiety. Personality and Individual Differences, 17, 111–116.Google Scholar
Calvo, M. G., Eysenck, M. W., Ramos, P. M. and Jimenez, A. (1994). Compensatory reading strategies in test anxiety. Anxiety, Stress and Coping: An International Journal, 7, 99–116.Google Scholar
Calvo, M. G. and Miguel-Tobal, J. J. (1998). The anxiety response: concordance among components. Motivation and Emotion, 22, 211–230.Google Scholar
Clark, D. M. (1986). A cognitive model of panic. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 24, 461–470.Google Scholar
Clark, L. A. and Watson, D. (1991). Tripartite model of anxiety and depression: psychometric evidence and taxonomic implications. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 100, 316–336.Google Scholar
Devellis, R. F. (1991). Scale Development: theory and applications. Newbury Park, Ca: Sage Publications, Inc.Google Scholar
Eke, M. and McNally, R. J. (1996). Anxiety sensitivity, suffocation fear, trait anxiety, and breath holding duration as predictors of response to carbon dioxide challenge. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 34, 603–607.Google Scholar
Endler, N. S., Cox, B. J., Parker, J. D. and Bagby, R. M. (1992). Self-reports of depression and state-trait anxiety: evidence for differential assessment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 832–838.Google Scholar
Endler, N. S. and Kocovski, N. L. (2001). State and trait anxiety revisited. Journal of Anxiety Disorders. 15, 231–345.Google Scholar
Endler, N. S., Parker, D. A., Bagby, R. M. and Cox, B. J. (1991). Multidimensionality of state and trait anxiety: factor structure of the Endler Multidimensional Anxiety Scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 919–926.Google Scholar
Forsyth, J. P., Palav, A. and Duff, K. (1999). The absence of relation between anxiety sensitivity and fear conditioning using 20% versus 13% CO2-enriched air as unconditioned stimuli. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 37, 143–153.Google Scholar
Grös, D. F., Antony, M. M., Simms, L. J. and McCabe, R. E. (2007). Psychometric properties of the State-Trait Inventory for Cognitive and Somatic Anxiety (STICSA): comparison to the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory. Psychological Assessment, 19, 369–381.Google Scholar
Himadi, W. G., Boice, R. and Barlow, D. H. (1985). Assessment of agoraphobia: triple response measurement. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 23, 311–323.Google Scholar
Joreskog, K. J. and Sorbom, D. (1993). LISREL 8 Users Reference Guide. Chicago, IL: Scientific Software Inc.Google Scholar
Kline, P. (1986). A Handbook of Test Construction: introduction to psychometric design. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
Kline, P. (1995). A critical review of the measurement of personality and intelligence. In Saklofske, D. H. and Zeidner, M. (Eds.), International Handbook of Personality and Intelligence: perspectives on individual differences (pp. 505–524). New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
Kocovski, N. L., Endler, N. S., Cox, B. J. and Swinson, R. P. (2004). The differential assessment of state-trait anxiety and depression in a clinically anxious sample. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 26, 165.Google Scholar
Koksal, F. and Power, G. G. (1990). Four Systems Anxiety Questionnaire (FSAQ): a self-report measure of somatic, cognitive, behavioural, and feeling components. Journal of Personality Assessment, 54, 534–545.Google Scholar
Koksal, F., Power, K. G. and Sharp, D. M. (1991). Profiles of DSM III anxiety disorders on the somatic, cognitive, behavioural, and feeling components of the Four Systems Anxiety Questionnaire. Personality and Individual Differences, 6, 643–651.Google Scholar
Lehrer, P. M. and Woolfolk, R. L. (1982). Self-report assessment of anxiety: somatic, cognitive, and behavioral modalities. Behavioral Assessment, 4, 167–177.Google Scholar
Lovibond, P. F. and Lovibond, S. H. (1995). Manual for the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales (2nd ed.). Sydney: Psychology Foundation of Australia.Google Scholar
Meng, X.-l., Rosenthal, R. and Rubin, D. B. (1992). Comparing correlated correlation coefficients. Psychological Bulletin, 111, 172–175.Google Scholar
Osman, A., Barrios, F. X., Aukes, D., Osman, J. R. and Markway, K. (1993). The Beck Anxiety Inventory: psychometric properties in a community population. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 15, 287–297.Google Scholar
Rapee, R. M., Craske, M. G., Brown, T. A. and Barlow, D. H. (1996). Measurement of perceived control over anxiety-related events. Behavior Therapy, 27, 279–293.Google Scholar
Rapee, R. M. and Medro, L. (1994). Fear of physical sensations and trait anxiety as mediators of the response to hyperventilation in nonclinical subjects. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 103, 693–699.Google Scholar
Ray, J. J. and Still, L. V. (1987). Maximizing the response rate in surveys may be a mistake. Personality and Individual Differences, 8, 571–573.Google Scholar
Reiss, S. (1997). Trait anxiety: it's not what you think it is. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 11, 201–214.Google Scholar
Scholing, A. and Emmelkamp, P. M. G. (1992). Self report assessment of anxiety: a cross validation of the Lehrer Woolfolk Anxiety Symptom Questionnaire in three populations. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 30, 521–531.Google Scholar
Schumacker, R. E. and Lomax, R. G. (1996). A Beginner's Guide to Structural Equation Modelling. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.Google Scholar
Schwartz, G. E., Davidson, R. J. and Guleman, D. J. (1978). Patterning of cognitive and somatic processes in the self-regulation of anxiety: effects of meditation versus exercise. Psychosomatic Medicine, 40, 321–328.Google ScholarPubMed
Spielberger, C. (1983). Manual for the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (Rev. ed.). Palo Alto, Ca: Consulting Psychologists Press.Google Scholar
Spielberger, C. D. (1985)a. Anxiety, cognition and affect: a state-trait perspective. In Tuma, A. H. and Maser, J. D. (Eds.), Anxiety and the Anxiety Disorders (pp. 171–182). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.Google Scholar
Spielberger, C. D. (1985)b. Assessment of state and trait anxiety: conceptual and methodological issues. Southern Psychologist, 2, 6–16.Google Scholar
Spielberger, C. D. and Sydeman, S. J. (1994). State-trait anxiety inventory and state-trait anger expression inventory. In Maruish, M. E. (Ed.). The Use of Psychological Testing for Treatment Planning and Outcome Assessment (pp. 292–321). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Wells, A. (1995). Meta-cognition and worry: a cognitive model of generalized anxiety disorder. Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy, 23, 301–320.Google Scholar
Zeidner, M. (1995). Coping with examination stress: resources, strategies, outcomes. Anxiety, Stress and Coping, 8, 279–298.Google Scholar
Zuckerman, M. (1983). The distinction between trait and state scales is not arbitrary: comment on Allen and Potkay's “On the arbitrary distinction between traits and states”. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44, 1083–1086.Google Scholar
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.