Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T01:40:21.008Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Controlled Clinical Trial of a Self-Help for Anxiety Intervention for Patients Waiting for Psychological Therapy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2008

Mike Lucock*
Affiliation:
South West Yorkshire Mental Health NHS Trust and University of Huddersfield, UK
Kath Padgett
Affiliation:
University of Huddersfield, UK
Rachael Noble
Affiliation:
University of Leeds, UK
Alison Westley
Affiliation:
Bradford and Airedale Teaching PCT, UK
Chris Atha
Affiliation:
The Retreat, York, UK
Carrie Horsefield
Affiliation:
South West Yorkshire Mental Health NHS Trust, UK
Chris Leach
Affiliation:
South West Yorkshire Mental Health NHS Trust and University of Sheffield, UK
*
Reprint requests to Mike Lucock, South West Yorks Mental Health Trust, APTS Fieldhead, Ouchthorpe Lane, Wakefield, West Yorkshire WF1 3SP, UK. E-mail: [email protected]

Abstract

This study was a controlled clinical trial in which patients were offered a brief low cost, low intensity self-help intervention while waiting for psychological therapy. A CBT based self-help pack was given to patients with significant anxiety problems and no attempt was made to exclude patients on the basis of severity or co-morbidity. The treatment group received the intervention immediately following assessment and the control group after a delay of 8 weeks so comparisons between the two groups were made over 8 weeks. Although there was some support for the effectiveness of the self help intervention, with a significant time x group interaction for CORE-OM scores, this was not significant with the intention to treat analysis, nor for HADS anxiety and depression scores and the effect size was low. A follow up evaluation suggested some patients attributed significant goal attainment to the intervention. The findings suggest the routine use of self-help interventions in psychological therapies services should be considered although further more adequately powered research is required to identify the type of patients and problems that most benefit, possible adverse effects and the effect on subsequent uptake of and engagement in therapy.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © British Association for Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapies 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barkham, M., Margison, F., Leach, C., Lucock, M., Benson, E., Mellor-Clark, J., Evans, C., Connell, J., Audin, K. and McGrath, G. (2001). Service profiling and outcomes benchmarking using the CORE-OM: towards practice-based evidence in the psychological therapies. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 69, 184196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bower, P., Richards, D. and Lovell, K. (2001). The clinical and cost-effectiveness of self-help treatments for anxiety and depressive disorders in primary care: a systematic review. British Journal of General Practice, 51, 838845.Google ScholarPubMed
Cohen, J. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 155159.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cuijpers, P. (1997) Bibliotherapy in unipolar depression: a meta-analysis. Journal of Behavioral Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 28, 39147.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Department of Health (2003). Fast-Forwarding Primary Care Mental Health: graduate primary care mental health workers. Best practice guide. London: Department of Health.Google Scholar
Evans, C., Connell, J., Barkham, M., Margison, F., McGrath, G., Mellor-Clark, J. and Audin, K. (2002). Towards a standardized brief outcome measure: psychometric properties and utility of the CORE-OM. British Journal of Psychiatry, 180, 5160.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gellatly, J. L., Bower, P. J., Hennessy, S., Richards, D. A., Gilbody, S. and Lovell, K. (2007). Psychological Medicine, 37, 12171228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gensichen, J. M., Beyer, M., Muth, C., Gerlach, F. M., Von Korff, M. and Ormel, J. (2006). Case management to improve major depression in primary health care: a systematic review. Psychological Medicine, 36, 714.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Glass, G. V., McGaw, B. and Smith, M. L. (1981). Meta Analysis in Social Research. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Gould, R. A. and Clum, G. A. (1993). A meta-analysis of self-help treatment approaches. Clinical Psychology Review, 13, 169186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leach, C., Lucock, M., Barkham, M., Noble, R. and Iveson, S. (2006). Transforming between Beck Depression Inventory and CORE-OM scores in routine clinical practice. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 45, 153166.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lewis, G., Anderson, L., Araya, R., Elgie, R., Harrison, G., Proudfoot, J., Schmidt, U., Sharp, D., Weightman, A. and Williams, C. (2003). Self-help Interventions for Mental Health Problems: report to the Department of Health RandD Programme. London: Department of Health and National Institute for Mental Health in England, 2003. www.nimhe.csip.org.uk/silo/files/self-help-in-mh-problemspdf.pdf (accessed 1 July 2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lovell, K. and Richards, D. (2000). Multiple Access Points and Levels of Entry (MAPLE): ensuring choice, accessibility and equity for CBT services. Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy, 28, 379391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marrs, R. W. (1995).A meta-analysis of bibliotherapy studies. American Journal of Community Psychology, 23, 843870.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Martinez, R., Whitfield, G., Dafters, R. and Williams, C. (2008). Can people read self-help manuals for depression? A challenge for the stepped care model and book prescription schemes. Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy, 36, 8997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mead, N., Macdonald, W., Bower, P., Lovell, K., Richards, D., Roberts, C. and Bucknall, A. (2005). The clinical effectiveness of guided self-help versus waiting list control in the management of anxiety and depression: a randomized controlled trial. Psychological Medicine, 35, 16331643.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
National Institute for Clinical Excellence (2004a). Management of Anxiety (Panic Disorder, with or without Agoraphobia and Generalized Anxiety Disorder) in Adults in Primary, Secondary and Community Care. London: National Institute for Clinical Excellence. http://www.nice.org.uk/nicemedia/pdf/cg022fullguideline.pdf (accessed 1 July 2008).Google Scholar
National Institute for Clinical Excellence (2004b). Management of Depression in Primary and Secondary Care. London: National Institute for Clinical Excellence. http://www.nice.org.uk/nicemedia/pdf/cg023fullguideline.pdf (accessed 1 July 2008).Google Scholar
National Institute for Clinical Excellence (2006). Computerized Cognitive Behavioural Therapy for Anxiety and Depression. Review of Technology Appraisal 51. London: National Institute for Clinical Excellence. http://www.nice.org.uk/nicemedia/pdf/TA097guidance.pdf (accessed 1 July 2008).Google Scholar
Richards, A., Barkham, M., Cahil, J., Richards, D., Williams, C. and Heywood, P. (2003) PHASE: a randomized controlled trial of supervised self-help cognitive behavioural therapy in primary care. British Journal of General Practice, 53, 764770.Google ScholarPubMed
Scogin, F., Hanson, A. and Welsh, D. (2003). Self administered treatment in stepped-care models of depression treatment. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 59, 379391.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Westen, D. and Morrison, K. (2001). A multidimensional meta-analysis of treatments for depression, panic, and generalized anxiety disorder: an empirical examination of the status of empirically supported therapies. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 69, 875899.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wright, B., Williams, C. and Garland, A. (2002) Using the Five Areas cognitive-behavioural therapy model with psychiatric patients. Advances in Psychiatric Treatment, 8, 307315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zigmond, A. S. and Snaith, P. R. (1983). The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 67, 361370.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.