Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-04T19:10:30.911Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Challenging Behaviours and Severe Learning Disabilities: Recent Developments in Behavioural Analysis and Intervention

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 June 2009

Eric Emerson
Eric Emerson
Affiliation:
University of Manchester
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Recent years have witnessed the gradual emergence of a technology of nonaversive behavioural support for people with severe learning disabilities and seriously challenging behaviours. Three key aspects of these developments are reviewed, including: the functional perspective to analysis and intervention; the incorporation of the analysis and modification of setting events into behavioural practice; and the use of experimental techniques to conduct functional analyses of the contextual control of challenging behaviours. Attention is drawn to the practical implications and limitations of these developments.

Type
Research Article
Information
Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy , Volume 21 , Issue 3 , July 1993 , pp. 171 - 198
Copyright
Copyright © British Association for Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapies 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Axelrod, S. (1987). Functional and structural analyses of behavior: approaches leading to the reduced use of punishment procedures? Research in Developmental Disabilities 8, 165–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baer, D.M., Wolf, M.M. and Risley, T.R. (1968). Some current dimensions of applied behavior analysis. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis 1, 91–97.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baer, D.M., Wolf, M.M. and Risley, T.R. (1987). Some still-current dimensions of applied behavior analysis. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis 20, 313–327.Google Scholar
Bailey, J.S. and Pyles, A.M. (1989). Behavioral diagnostics. In Cipani, E. (Ed). The Treatment of Severe Behavior Disorders. Washington, DC: American Association on Mental Retardation.Google Scholar
Bakeman, R. and Gottman, J.M. (1986). Observing Interaction: An Introduction to Sequential Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Barlow, D.H. and Hersen, M. (1984). Single Case Experimental Designs. Oxford: Pergamon.Google Scholar
Barrett, R.P., Feinstein, C. and Hole, W.T. (1989). Effects of Naloxone and Naltrexone on self-injury: a double blind, placebo-controlled analysis. American Journal on Mental Retardation 93, 644–651.Google ScholarPubMed
Baumeister, A.A. and MacLean, W.E. (1984). Deceleration of self-injurious and stereotypic responding by exercise. Applied Research in Mental Retardation 5, 385–393.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bijou, S.W. and Baer, D.M. (1978). Behavior Analysis of Child Development. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Bird, F., Dores, P.A., Moniz, D. and Robinson, J. (1989). Reducing severe aggressive and self-injurious behaviours with functional communication training. American Journal on Mental Retardation 94, 37–48.Google Scholar
Blunden, R. and Allen, D. (1987). Facing the Challenge: An Ordinary Life for People with Learning Difficulties and Challenging Behaviours. London: King's Fund.Google Scholar
Brown, F. (1991). Creative daily scheduling: a nonintrusive approach to challenging behaviors in community residences. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps 16, 75–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carr, E.G. (1988). Functional equivalence as a mechanism of response generalization. In Horner, R.H., Dunlap, G. and Koegel, R.L. (Eds). Generalization and Maintenance: Life-Style Changes in Applied Settings. Baltimore: P.H. Brookes.Google Scholar
Carr, E.G. and Durand, V.M. (1985a). The social-communicative basis of severe behavior problems in children. In Reiss, S. and Bootzin, R.R. (Eds). Theoretical Issues in Behavior Therapy. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Carr, E.G. and Durand, V.M. (1985b). Reducing behavior problems through functional communication training. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis 18, 111–126.Google Scholar
Carr, E.G., McConnachie, G., Levin, L. and Kemp, D.C. (in press). Communication-based treatment of severe behavior problems. In Van Houten, R. and Axelrod, S. (Eds). Effective Behavioral Treatment: Issues and Implementation. New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
Carr, E.G., Newsom, C.D. and Binkoff, J.A. (1976). Stimulus control of self-destructive behavior in a psychotic child. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology 4, 139–153.Google Scholar
Carr, E.G., Newsom, C.D. and Binkoff, J.A. (1980). Escape as a factor in the aggressive behavior of two retarded children. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis 13, 101–117.Google Scholar
Carr, E.G., Robinson, S., Taylor, J.C. and Carlson, J.I. (1990). Positive Approaches to the Treatment of Severe Behavior Problems in Persons with Developmental Disabilities. Seattle: The Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps.Google Scholar
Carr, E.G., Robinson, S. and Palumbo, L.W. (1990). The wrong issue: aversive versus nonaversive treatment. The right issue: functional versus nonfunctional treatment. In Repp, A.C. and Singh, N. (Eds). Current Perspectives in the Use of Nonaversive and Aversive Interventions with Developmentally Disabled Persons. Sycamore, IL: Sycamore Press.Google Scholar
Chaney, R.H., Forbes, L. and Leve, L. (1989). Relationship of electroencephalographic rhythms to aggressive behavior in mentally retarded persons. Brain Dysfunction 2, 196–200.Google Scholar
Crawford, J., Brockel, B., Schauss, S. and Miltenberger, R.G. (1992). A comparison of methods for the functional assessment of stereotypic behavior. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps 17, 77–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davison, M. and McCarthy, D. (1988). The Matching Law: A Research Review. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum and Associates.Google Scholar
Day, R.M., Johnson, W.L. and Schussler, N.G. (1986). Determining the communicative properties of self-injury: research, assessment and treatment implications. In Gadow, K. (Ed). Advances in Learning and Behavioral Disabilities, Vol 5. London: JAI Press.Google Scholar
Day, R.M., Rea, J.A., Schussler, N.G., Larsen, S.E. and Johnson, W.L. (1988). A functionally based approach to the treatment of self-injurious behavior. Behavior Modification 12, 565–589.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Derby, K.M., Wacker, D.P., Sasso, G., Steege, M., Northup, J., Cigrand, K. and Asmus, J. (1992). Brief functional assessment techniques to evaluate aberrant behavior in an outpatient setting: a summary of 79 cases. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis 25, 713–721.Google Scholar
Donnellan, A.M., LaVigna, G.W., Negri-Shoultz, N. and Fassbender, L.L. (1988). Progress Without Punishment: Effective Approaches for Learners with Behavior Problems. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
Donnellan, A.M., Mirenda, P., Mesaros, R. and Fassbender, L. (1984). Analyzing the communicative functions of aberrant behavior. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps 9, 201–212.Google Scholar
Duker, P.C., Jol, K. and Palmen, A. (1991). The collateral decrease of self-injurious behavior with teaching communicative gestures to individuals who are mentally retarded. Behavioral Residential Treatment 61, 183–196.Google Scholar
Dunlap, G., Kern-Dunlap, L., Clarke, S. and Robbins, F.R. (1991). Functional assessment, curricular revision and severe behavior problems. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis 24, 387–397.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Durand, V.M. (1986). Self-injurious behavior as intentional communication. In Gadow, K. (Ed). Advances in Learning and Behavioral Disabilities, Vol 5. London: JAI Press.Google Scholar
Durand, V.M. (1987). ‘Look homeward angel’ A call to return to our (functional) roots. The Behavior Analyst 10, 299–302.Google Scholar
Durand, V.M. (1990). Severe Behavior Problems: A Functional Communication Training Approach. New York: Guildford Press.Google Scholar
Durand, V.M. and Carr, E.G. (1987). Social influences on ‘self-stimulatory’ behavior: analysis and treatment implications. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis 20, 119–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Durand, V.M. and Carr, E.G. (1991). Functional communication training to reduce challenging behavior: maintenance and application in new settings. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis 24, 251–264.Google Scholar
Durand, V.M. and Crimmins, D.B. (1988). Identifying the variables maintaining self-injurious behavior. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders 18, 99–115.Google Scholar
Durand, V.M. and Crimmins, D.B. (1991). Teaching functionally equivalent responses as an intervention for challenging behaviour. In Remington, B. (Ed). The Challenge of Severe Mental Handicap: A Behaviour Analytic Approach. Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
Durand, V.M. and Kishi, G. (1987). Reducing severe behavior problems among persons with dual sensory impairments: an evaluation of a technical assistance model. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps 12, 2–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Durand, V.M., Crimmins, D., Caulfield, M. and Taylor, J. (1989). Reinforcer assessment I: Using problem behavior to select reinforcers. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps 14, 113–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dyer, K., Dunlap, G. and Winterling, V. (1990). Effects of choice making on the serious problem behaviors of students with severe handicaps. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis 23, 515–524.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Emerson, E. (1990a). Designing individualised community based placements as alternatives to institutions for people with a severe mental handicap and severe problem behaviour. In Fraser, W. (Ed). Key Issues in Mental Retardation. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Emerson, E. (1990b). Severe self-injurious behaviour: some of the challenges it presents. Mental Handicap 18, 92–98.Google Scholar
Emerson, E. (1992). Self-injurious behaviour: a review of recent developments in epidemiological and behavioural research. Mental Handicap Research 5, 49–81.Google Scholar
Emerson, E. and Howard, D. (1992). Schedule induced stereotypy. Research in Developmental Disabilities 13, 335–361.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Emerson, E., Barrett, S. and Cummings, R. (1990). Using Analogue Assessments. Bexhill-on-Sea: South East Thames Regional Health Authority.Google Scholar
Emerson, E., McGill, P. and Mansell, J. (1993). Severe Learning Disabilities and Challenging Behaviours: Designing High Quality Services. London: Chapman & Hall.Google Scholar
Epling, W.F. and Pierce, W.D. (1983). Applied behavior analysis: new directions from the laboratory. The Behavior Analyst 61, 27–37.Google Scholar
Evans, I.M. and Meyer, L.M. (1985). An Educative Approach to Behavior Problems. Baltimore: P.H. Brookes.Google Scholar
Evans, I.M. and Meyer, L.H. (1990). Toward a science in support of meaningful outcomes: a response to Horner et al. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps 15, 133–135.Google Scholar
Falk, J.L. (1971). The nature and determinants of adjunctive behavior. Physiology and Behavior 6, 577–588.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Favell, J.E., McGimsey, J.F., Jones, M.L. and Cannon, P.R. (1981). Physical restraint as positive reinforcement. American Journal of Mental Deficiency 85, 425–432.Google Scholar
Foster, W.S. (1978). Adjunctive behavior: an underreported phenomenon in applied behavior analysis. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis 11, 545–546.Google Scholar
Gardner, W.I., Cole, C.L., Davison, D.P. and Karan, O.C. (1986). Reducing aggression in individuals with developmental disabilities: an expanded stimulus control, assessment, and intervention model. Education and Training of the Mentally Retarded 21, 3–12.Google Scholar
Gardner, W.I. and Cole, C.L. (1990). Aggression and related conduct disorders. In Matson, J.L.(Ed). Handbook of Behavior Modification with the Mentally Retarded. New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
Gedye, A. (1989). Extreme self-injury attributed to frontal lobe seizures. American Journal on Mental Retardation 94, 20–26.Google Scholar
Goldiamond, I. (1974). Toward a constructional approach to social problems: ethical and constitutional issues raised by applied behavior analysis. Behaviorism 2, 1–84.Google Scholar
Guess, D. and Carr, E.G. (1991). Emergence and maintenance of stereotypy and self-injury. American Journal of Mental Retardation 96, 299–320.Google ScholarPubMed
Guess, D., Siegel-Causey, E., Roberts, S., Rues, J., Thompson, B. and Siegel-Causey, D. (1990). Assessment and analysis of behavior state and related variables among students with profoundly handicapping conditions. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps 15, 211–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harchik, A.E. and Putzier, V.S. (1990). The use of high-probability requests to increase compliance with instructions to take medication. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps 15, 40–43.Google Scholar
Harper, V. and Bodfish, J.W. (1990). Research on the experimental functional analysis of self-injury in a sample of institutionalised mentally retarded persons.Paper presented at the Sixteenth Annual Conference of the International Association for Behavior Analysis.Google Scholar
Hayes, S.C., Rincover, A. and Solnick, J.V. (1980). The technical drift of applied behavior analysis. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis 13, 275–285.Google Scholar
Helmstetter, E. and Durand, V.M. (1991). Nonaversive interventions for severe behavior problems. In Meyer, L.H., Peck, C.A. and Brown, L. (Eds). Critical Issues in the Lives of People with Severe Disabilities. Baltimore: P.H. Brookes.Google Scholar
Higgins Hains, A. and Baer, D.M. (1989). Interaction effects in multielement designs: inevitable, desirable, and ignorable. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis 22, 57–69.Google Scholar
Horner, R.H. and Budd, C.M. (1985). Acquisition of manual sign use: collateral reduction in maladaptive behavior and factors limiting generalisation. Education and Training of the Mentally Retarded 20, 39–47.Google Scholar
Horner, R.H. and Day, H.M. (1991). The effects of response efficiency on functionally equivalent competing behaviors. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis 24, 719–732.Google Scholar
Horner, R.H., Day, H.M., Sprague, J.R., O'Brien, M. and Heathfield, L.T. (1991). Interspersed requests: a nonaversive procedure for reducing aggression and self-injury during instruction. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis 24, 265–278.Google Scholar
Horner, R.H., Dunlap, G., Koegel, R.L., Carr, E.G., Sailor, W., Anderson, J., Albin, R.W. and O'Neill, R.E. (1990). Toward a technology of ‘nonaversive’ behavioral support. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps 15, 125–132.Google Scholar
Horner, R.H., Sprague, J.R., O'Brien, M. and Heathfield, L.T. (1990). The role of response efficiency in the reduction of problem behaviors through functional equivalence training: a case study. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps 15, 91–97.Google Scholar
Iwata, B.A., Dorsey, M.F., Slifer, K.J., Bauman, K.E. and Richman, G.S. (1982). Toward a functional analysis of self-injury. Analysis and Intervention in Developmental Disabilities 2, 3–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iwata, B.A., Pace, G.M., Kalsher, M.J., Cowdery, G.E. and Cataldo, M.F. (1990). Experimental analysis and extinction of self-injurious escape behavior. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis 23, 11–27.Google Scholar
Iwata, B.A., Vollmer, T.R. and Zarcone, J.R. (1990). The experimental (functional) analysis of behavior disorders: Methodology, applications, and limitations. In Repp, A.C. and Singh, N.N. (Eds). Perspectives on the Use of Nonaversive and Aversive Interventions for Persons with Developmental Disabilities. Sycamore, IL: Sycamore Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Jansma, P. and Combs, C.S. (1987). The effects of fitness training and reinforcement on maladaptive behaviors of institutionalised adults classified as mentally retarded/emotionally disturbed. Education and Training of the Mentally Retarded 22, 268–279.Google Scholar
Kantor, J.R. (1959). Interbehavioral Psychology. Chicago: Principa Press.Google Scholar
Kennedy, C.H. and Haring, T.G. (1992). Reducing the serious behavior problems of people with developmental disabilities living in the community. Behavioral Residential Treatment 7, 81–98.Google Scholar
Konarski, E.A., Johnson, M.R., Crowell, C.R. and Whitman, T.L. (1981). An alternative approach to reinforcement for applied researchers: response deprivation. Behavior Therapy 12, 653–666.Google Scholar
LaVigna, G.W. and Donnellan, A.M. (1986). Alternatives to Punishment: Solving Behavior Problems with Non-Aversive Strategies. New York: Irvington.Google Scholar
Lancioni, G.E., Smeets, P.M., Ceccarani, P.S., Capodaglio, L. and Campanari, G. (1984). Effects of gross motor activities on the severe self-injurious tantrums of multihandicapped individuals. Applied Research in Mental Retardation 5, 471–482.Google Scholar
Lennox, D.B. and Miltenberger, R.G. (1989). Conducting a functional assessment of problem behavior in applied settings. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps 14, 304–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, M.H. and Baumeister, A.A. (1982). Stereotyped mannerisms in mentally retarded persons: animal models and theoretical analyses. In Ellis, N.R. (Ed). International Review of Research in Mental Retardation. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Lowry, M.A. and Sovner, R. (1992). Severe behaviour problems associated with rapid cycling bipolar disorder in two adults with profound mental retardation. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research 36, 269–281.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mace, F.C., Hock, M.L., Lalli, J.S., West, B.J., Belfiore, P., Pinter, E. and Brown, B.D. (1988). Behavioral momentum in the treatment of noncompliance. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis 21, 123–141.Google Scholar
Mace, F.C., Lalli, J.S. and Lalli, E.P. (1991). Functional analysis and treatment of aberrant behavior. Research in Developmental Disabilities 12, 155–180.Google Scholar
Mace, F.C., Page, T.J., Ivancic, M.T. and O'Brien, S. (1986). Analysis of environmental determinants of aggression and disruption in mentally retarded children. Applied Research in Mental Retardation 7, 203–221.Google Scholar
Mace, F.C. and Knight, D. (1986). Functional analysis and treatment of severe pica. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis 19, 411–416.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McAfee, J.K. (1987). Classroom density and the aggressive behavior of handicapped children. Education and Treatment of Children 10, 134–145.Google Scholar
McGee, J.J., Menolascino, F.J., Hobbs, D.C. and Menousek, P.E. (1987). Gentle Teaching: A Non-Aversive Approach to Helping Persons with Mental Retardation. New York: Human Sciences Press.Google Scholar
McGonigle, J.J., Rojahn, J., Dixon, J. and Strain, P.S. (1987). Multiple treatment interference in alternating treatments design as a function of the intercomponent interval length. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis 20, 171–178.Google Scholar
Meyer, L. and Evans, I.M. (1989). Nonaversive Intervention for Behavior Problems: A Manual for Home and Community. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
Meyer, L.H. and Janney, R. (1989). User-friendly measures of meaningful out-comes: evaluating behavioral interventions. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps 14, 262–270.Google Scholar
Michael, J. (1982). Distinguishing between discriminative and motivational functions of stimuli. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior 37, 149–155.Google Scholar
Morgan, R.L., Striefel, S., Baer, R. and Percival, G. (1991). Regulating behavioral procedures for individuals with handicaps: review of State Department standards. Research in Developmental Disabilities 12, 63–85.Google Scholar
Mulick, J.A. (1990). The ideology and science of punishment in mental retardation. American Journal of Mental Retardation 95, 142–156.Google Scholar
Murphy, G. (1993). Understanding challenging behaviour. In Emerson, E., McGill, P. and Mansell, J. (Eds). Severe Learning Disability and Challenging Behaviours: Designing High Quality Services. London: Chapman & Hall.Google Scholar
O'Neill, R.E., Horner, R.H., Albin, R.W., Storey, K. and Sprague, J.R. (1990). Functional Analysis of Problem Behavior: A Practical Assessment Guide. Sycamore, IL: Sycamore Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Oliver, C. (1991). The application of analogue methodology to the functional analysis of challenging behaviour. In Remington, B. (Ed). The Challenge of Severe Mental Handicap: A Behaviour Analytic Approach. Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
Oliver, C., Crayton, L., Murphy, G. and Corbett, J. (unpublished). Formal functional analysis of self-injurious behaviour: the further development of analogue conditions.Google Scholar
Oliver, C. and Head, D. (1990). Self-injurious behaviour in people with learning disabilities: determinants and interventions. International Review of Psychiatry 2, 101–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paisey, T.J.H., Whitney, R.B. and Moore, J. (1989). Person-treatment interactions across nonaversive response-deceleration procedures for self-injury: a case study of effects and side effects. Behavioral Residential Treatment 4, 69–88.Google Scholar
Paisey, T.J.H., Whitney, R.B. and Hislop, P.M. (1991). Non-intrusive operant analysis of aggressive behavior in persons with mental retardation. Behavioral Residential Treatment 6, 51–64.Google Scholar
Pierce, W.D. and Epling, W.F. (1980). What happened to the analysis in applied behavior analysis? The Behavior Analyst 3, 1–9.Google Scholar
Podboy, J.W. and Mallery, W.A. (1977). Caffeine reduction and behavior change in the severely retarded. Mental Retardation 15, 40.Google Scholar
Pyles, D.A.M. and Bailey, J.S. (1990). Diagnosing severe behavior problems. Repp, A.C. and Singh, N.N. (Eds). Perspectives on the Use of Nonaversive and Aversive Interventions for Persons with Developmental Disabilities. Sycamore, IL: Sycamore Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Qureshi, H. (1990). Parents Caring for Young Adults with Mental Handicap and Behaviour Problems. Manchester: Hester Adrian Research Centre.Google Scholar
Remington, B. (1991). Behaviour analysis and severe mental handicap: the dialogue between research and application. In Remington, B. (Ed). The Challenge of Severe Mental Handicap: A Behaviour Analytic Approach. Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
Repp, A.C. and Singh, N.N. (1990). Perspectives on the Use of Nonaversive and Aversive Interventions for Persons with Developmental Disabilities. Sycamore, IL: Sycamore Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Sackett, G.P. (1979). The lag sequential analysis of contingency and cyclicity in behavioral interaction research. In Osofsky, J.D. (Ed). Handbook of Infant Development. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Sackett, G.P. (1987). Analysis of sequential social interaction data: some issues, recent developments and a causal inference model. In Osofsky, J.D. (Ed). Handbook of Infant Development (2nd Edn). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Sampson, D.M. and McDonnell, A.A. (1990). Functional analysis and challenging behaviour. Behavioural Psychotherapy 18, 259–271.Google Scholar
Sandman, C.A. (1988). B-endorphin disregulation in autistic and self-injurious behavior: a neurodevelopmental hypothesis. Synapse 2, 193–199.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sandman, C.A. (1992). Pre and perinatal disregulation of the opiate system.Paper presented at the 25th Gatlinburg Conference,Gatlinburg, TN.Google Scholar
Sandman, C.A., Barron, J.L., Chicz-DeMet, A. and DeMet, E.M. (1990). Plasma b-endorphin levels in patients with self-injurious behavior and stereotypy. American Journal of Mental Retardation 95, 84–92.Google Scholar
Schroeder, S.R. (1990). Ecobehavioral Analysis and Developmental Disabilities. New York: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
Schroeder, S.R. (1991). Self-injury and stereotypy. In Matson, J.L. and Mulick, J.A. (Eds). Handbook of Mental Retardation (2nd Edn). New York: Pergamon.Google Scholar
Scotti, J.R., EvansU, I.M., Meyer, L.H. and DiBenedetto, A. (1991). Individual repertoires as behavioural systems: implications for program design and intervention. In Remington, B. (Ed). The Challenge of Severe Mental Handicap: A Behaviour Analytic Approach. Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
Schwartz, I.S. and Baer, D.M. (1991). Social validity assessments: is current practice state of the art? Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis 24, 189–204.Google Scholar
Singer, G.H.S., Singer, J. and Horner, R.H. (1987). Using pretask requests to increase the probability of compliance for students with severe disabilities. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps 12, 287–291.Google Scholar
Solnick, J.V., Rincover, A. and Peterson, C.R. (1977). Some determinants of the reinforcing and punishing effects of timeout. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis 10, 415–424.Google Scholar
Sprague, J.R. and Horner, R.H. (1992). Covariation within functional response classes: implications for treatment of severe problem behavior. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis 25, 735–745.Google Scholar
Steege, M.W., Wacker, D.P., Berg, W.K., Cigrand, K.K. and Cooper, L.J. (1989). The use of behavioral assessment to prescribe and evaluate treatments for severely handicapped children. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis 22, 23–33.Google Scholar
Steege, M.W., Wacker, D.P., Cigrand, K.C., Berg, W., Novak, C.G., Reimers, T.M., Sasso, G.M. and DeRaad, A. (1990). Use of negative reinforcement in the treatment of self-injurious behavior. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis 23, 459–467.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sturmey, P., Carlsen, A., Crisp, A.G. and Newton, J.T. (1988). A functional analysis of multiple aberrant responses: a refinement and extension of Iwata et al's methodology. Journal of Mental Deficiency Research 32, 31–46.Google Scholar
Talkington, L. and Riley, J. (1971). Reduction diets and aggression in institutionalized mentally retarded patients. American Journal of Mental Deficiency 76, 370–372.Google Scholar
Touchette, P.E., MacDonald, R.F. and Langer, S.N. (1985). A scatter plot for identifying stimulus control of problem behavior. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis 18, 343–351.Google Scholar
Vollmer, T.R. and Iwata, B.A. (1991). Establishing operations and reinforcement effects. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis 24, 279–291.Google Scholar
Wacker, D., McMahon, C., Steege, M., Berg, W., Sasso, G. and Melloy, K. (1990). Applications of sequential alternating treatments design. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis 23, 333–339.Google Scholar
Wacker, D., Steege, M., Northup, J., Reimers, T., Berg, W. and Sasso, G. (1990). Use of functional analysis and acceptability measures to assess and treat severe behavior problems: an outpatient clinic model. In Repp, A.C. and Singh, N.N. (Eds). Perspectives on the Use of Nonaversive and Aversive Interventions for Persons with Developmental Disabilities. Sycamore, IL: Sycamore Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Wacker, D.P., Steege, J.N., Sasso, G., Berg, W., Reimers, T., Cooper, L., Cigrand, K. and Donn, L. (1990). A component analysis of functional communication training across three topographies of severe behavior problems. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis 23, 417–429.Google Scholar
Wahler, R.G. and Fox, J.J. (1981). Setting events in applied behavior analysis: toward a conceptual and methodological expansion. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis 14, 327–338.Google Scholar
Willems, E.P. (1974). Behavioral technology and behavioral ecology. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis 7, 151–165.Google Scholar
Willems, E.P. (1977). Steps toward an ecobehavioral technology. In Rogers-Warren, A. and Warren, S.F. (Eds). Ecological Perspectives in Behavior Analysis. Baltimore: University Park Press.Google Scholar
Winterling, V., Dunlap, G. and O'Neill, R.E. (1987). The influence of task variation on the aberrant behaviors of autistic students. Education and Treatment of Children 10, 105–119.Google Scholar
Wolf, M.M. (1978). Social validity: the case for subjective measurement, or how applied behavior analysis is finding its heart. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis 11 203–214.Google Scholar
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.