Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T03:24:51.223Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

BEHAVIORAL TREATMENT FOR CHILD DISTRESS DURING REPEATED NEEDLE STICKS

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 February 2002

Keith J. Slifer
Affiliation:
Kennedy Krieger Institute,USA Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, USA
Stephanie E. Eischen
Affiliation:
Kennedy Krieger Institute,USA University of Maryland Baltimore County, USA
Cindy L. Tucker
Affiliation:
Kennedy Krieger Institute,USA Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, USA
Lynnda M. Dahlquist
Affiliation:
University of Maryland Baltimore County, USA
Suzanne Busby
Affiliation:
Kennedy Krieger Institute,USA University of Maryland Baltimore County, USA
Wendy Sulc
Affiliation:
University of Maryland Baltimore County, USA
Lisa Hilley
Affiliation:
University of Maryland Baltimore County, USA

Abstract

The objective of this study was to evaluate a multi-component behavioral intervention for child distress during repeated needle sticks. An AB single-subject experimental design with replication of procedures across five subjects was used to assess intervention effects on distress and procedure duration for five children (age 3–7 years). Playing preferred activities, signaled button pressing, and following directions were positively reinforced first during simulated then actual needle procedures. The results indicate that distress decreased substantially for three children, slightly for a fourth and was unchanged for one. Heart rate (HR) data obtained from one child provided preliminary evidence of counterconditioning. For three children with follow-up data, benefits were maintained after intervention transfer to caregivers. In conclusion, distraction and counter-conditioning appear to be compatible conceptualizations for designing interventions to reduce the distress of experienced children who undergo repeated invasive procedures. The independent and synergistic effects of behavioral interventions based on these two theories should be examined in future studies.

Type
Clinical Section
Copyright
© 2002 British Association for Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapies

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.