Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T02:25:45.905Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Assessment of Anger-Related Cognitions of People with Intellectual Disabilities

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 March 2016

Charlotte Richardson ,
Stewart Killeen ,
Andrew Jahoda ,
Rose Christopher ,
John Rose  and
Paul Willner
Charlotte Richardson
Affiliation:
Swansea University, Wales
Stewart Killeen
Affiliation:
Swansea University, Wales
Andrew Jahoda
Affiliation:
University of Glasgow, Scotland
Rose Christopher
Affiliation:
University of Birmingham, UK
John Rose
Affiliation:
University of Birmingham, UK
Paul Willner*
Affiliation:
Swansea University, Wales
*
Correspondence to Paul Willner, Department of Psychology, Swansea University, Swansea SA2 8PP, UK. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Background: Interventions for anger represent the largest body of research on the adaptation of cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) for people with intellectual disabilities. The extent to which the effectiveness of these interventions reflects the behavioural or cognitive components of CBT is uncertain. This arises in part because there are few measures of anger-related cognitions. Method: The Profile of Anger-related Cognitions (PAC) is built around interpersonal scenarios that the participant identifies as personally anger-provoking, and was designed as an extension of the Profile of Anger Coping Skills (PACS). A conversational presentational style is used to approach ratings of anger experienced in those situations and of four relevant cognitive dimensions: attribution of hostile intent, unfairness, victimhood, and helplessness. The PAC, and other measures, including the PACS, was administered to (i) people with ID identified as having problems with anger control (n = 12) and (ii) university students (n = 23); its psychometric properties were investigated and content analyses were conducted of participants’ verbal responses. In a third study, clinicians (n = 6) were surveyed for their impression of using the PAC in the assessment of clients referred for help with anger problems. Results: The PAC had good consistency and test-retest reliability, and the total score on the four cognitive dimensions correlated significantly with anger ratings but not with impersonal measures of anger disposition. The predominant cognitions reported were perceptions of unfairness and helplessness. People with ID and university students were in most respects very similar in both the psychometric analyses and the content analyses of their verbal responses. The PAC had high acceptability both to people with ID and to clinicians. Conclusions: The PAC may be a useful instrument for both clinical and research purposes. Personal relevance and the conversational mode of administration are particular strengths.

Keywords

Adultsangercognitive appraisalsintellectual disabilities
Type
Research Article
Information
Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy , Volume 44 , Issue 5 , September 2016 , pp. 580 - 600
Copyright
Copyright © British Association for Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapies 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Atkins, M. J. (1984). Practitioner as researcher: some techniques for analyzing semi-structured data in small-scale research. British Journal of Educational Studies, 32, 251–261.Google Scholar
Basquill, M. F., Nezu, C. M., Nezu, A. M., Klein, T. L. and MacLean, W. E. Jr. (2004). Aggression-related hostility bias and social problem-solving deficits in adult males with mental retardation. American Journal on Mental Retardation, 109, 255–263.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Batson, S. C., Kennedy, C. L., Nord, L.-A., Stocks, E. L., Fleming, D.'Y.A., Marzette, C. M., et al. (2007) Anger at unfairness: Is it moral outrage? European Journal of Social Psychology 37, 1272–1285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benson, B. A. and Brooks, W. T. (2008). Aggressive challenging behaviour and intellectual disability. Current Opinion in Psychiatry, 21, 454–458.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Berkowitz, L. and Harmon-Jones, E. (2004). Towards an understanding of the determinants of anger. Emotion, 42, 107–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burford, B. and Jahoda, A. (2012). Do video reviews of therapy sessions help people with mild intellectual disabilities describe their perceptions of cognitive behaviour therapy? Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 56, 179–190.Google Scholar
Buss, A. H. and Durkee, A. (1957). An inventory for assessing different kinds of hostility. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 21, 343–349.Google Scholar
Chamberlain, J. and Haaga, D. A. (1999). Convergent validity of cognitive assessment methods. Behavior Modification, 23, 294–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chinn, S. (1991). Repeatability and method comparison. Thorax, 46, 454–456.Google Scholar
Cohen, J. (1960). A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20, 37–46.Google Scholar
Crick, N. I. and Doidge, K. A. (1996). Social information-processing mechanisms in reactive and proactive aggression. Child Development, 67, 993–1002.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cuthill, F. M., Espie, C. A. and Cooper, S.-A. (2003). Development and psychometric properties of the Glasgow Depression Scale for people with a Learning Disability. The British Journal of Psychiatry, 182, 347–353.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dagnan, D., Chadwick, P. and Proudlove, J. (2000). Toward an assessment of suitability of people with mental retardation for cognitive therapy. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 24, 627–636.Google Scholar
David, D., Schnur, J. and Belliou, A. (2002). Another search for the “hot” cognitions: appraisal, irrational beliefs, attributions, and their relation to emotion. Journal of Rational-Emotive and Cognitive-Behavior Therapy, 20, 93–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davison, G. C., Vogel, R. S. and Coffman, S. G. (1997). Think-aloud approaches to cognitive assessment and the articulated thoughts in simulated situations paradigm. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 65, 950–958.Google Scholar
Deffenbacher, J. L. (1999). Cognitive-behavioral conceptualization and treatment of anger. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 55, 295–309.Google Scholar
Department of Health (2011). Talking therapies: a four-year plan of action. https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/213765/dh_123985.pdf Google Scholar
Didden, R., Duker, P. and Korzilius, H. (1997). Meta-analytic study on treatment effectiveness for problem behaviours in individuals who have mental retardation. American Journal on Mental Retardation, 101, 387–399.Google Scholar
Eckhardt, C. I. and Dye, M. L. (2000). The cognitive characteristics of martially violent men: theory and evidence. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 24, 139–158.Google Scholar
Eckhardt, C. I., Barbour, K. A. and Davison, G. C. (1998). Articulated thoughts of maritally violent and nonviolent men during anger arousal. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 66, 259–269.Google Scholar
Equality Act (2010). Office for Public Sector Information, London. http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2010/15/contents/enacted Google Scholar
Gibbs, J. C., Barriga, A. Q. and Potter, B. D. (2001). How I Think Questionnaire Manual. Champaign, IL: Research Press.Google Scholar
Griffith, G. M., Hutchinson, L. and Hastings, R. P. (2013). “I'm not a patient, I'm a person”- the experiences of individuals with intellectual disabilities and challenging behavior: a thematic synthesis of qualitative studies. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 20, 469–488.Google Scholar
Hagiliassis, N., Gulbenkoglu, H., Di Marco, M., Young, S. and Hudson, A. (2005). The Anger Management Project: a group intervention for anger in people with physical and multiple disabilities. Journal of Intellectual and Developmental Disability, 30, 86–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamelin, J., Travis, R. and Sturmey, P. (2013). Anger management and intellectual disabilities: a systematic review. Journal of Mental Health Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 6, 60–70.Google Scholar
Hofmann, S. G., Asnaani, A., Imke, J. J., Vonk, I. J. J., Sawyer, A. T. and Fang, A. (2012). The efficacy of cognitive behavioral therapy: a review of meta-analyses. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 36, 427–440.Google Scholar
Hunter, C., Nadany, S. and Cragg, R. (2010). The Birmingham provocation hierarchy: for adults with mild to borderline learning disabilities. Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities, 10, 365–186.Google Scholar
Increasing Access to Psychological Therapies (2009). Learning Disabilities: positive practice guide. http://www.iapt.nhs.uk/silo/files/learning-disabilities-positive-practice-guide.pdf.Google Scholar
Jahoda, A., Trower, P., Pert, C. and Finn, D. (2001). Contingent reinforcement or defending the self? A review of evolving models of aggression in people with mild learning disabilities. British Journal of Medical Psychology, 74, 305–321.Google Scholar
Jahoda, A., Pert, C., Zquire, J. and Trower, P. (2002). Facing stress and conflict: a comparison of the predicted responses and self-concepts of aggressive and non-aggressive people with intellectual disability. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 42, 360–290CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jahoda, A., Pert, C. and Trower, P. (2006). Frequent aggression and attribution of hostile intent in people with mild to moderate intellectual disabilities: an empirical investigation. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 42, 360–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jahoda, A., Willner, P., Rose, J., Stenfert Kroese, B., Lammie, C., Shead, J., et al. (2013). Development of a scale to measure fidelity to manualized group-based cognitive behavioural interventions for people with intellectual disabilities. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 34, 4210–4221.Google Scholar
Jones, J. and Trower, P. (2004). Irrational and evaluative beliefs in individuals with anger disorders. Journal of Rational-Emotive and Cognitive-Behavior Therapy, 22, 3–20.Google Scholar
Joyce, T., Globe, A. and Mooney, C. (2006). Assessment of the component skills for cognitive therapy in adults with intellectual disability. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disability, 19, 17–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kendall, P. C. (1984). Behavioral assessment and methodology. Annual Review of Behavior Therapy, 9, 39–94.Google Scholar
Larkin, P., Jahoda, A., MacMahon, K. and Pert, C. (2011). Interpersonal sources of conflict in young people with and without mild to moderate intellectual disabilities at transition from adolescence to adulthood. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 25, 29–38.Google Scholar
Larkin, P., Jahoda, A. and MacMahon, K. (2013). The social information processing model as a framework for explaining frequent aggression in adults with mild to moderate intellectual disabilities: a systematic review of the evidence. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 26, 447–465.Google Scholar
Lindsay, W. R. (2006). That wee laddie cannae tell his thoughts fae his actions: a reply to Sturmey. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 19, 119–120.Google Scholar
Lindsay, W. R., Jahoda, A. and Willner, P. (2013). Techniques in psychological therapy for people with intellectual disabilities II: adaptation of treatment techniques. In Taylor, J. L., Lindsay, W. R., Hastings, R. and Hatton, C. (Eds.), Psychological Therapies for People with Intellectual Disabilities (pp.101–116). Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
Martin, R. C. and Dahlen, E. R. (2004). Irrational beliefs and the experience and expression of anger. Journal of Rational-Emotive and Cognitive-Behavior Therapy, 22, 3–20.Google Scholar
Martin, R. C. and Dahlen, E. R. (2007). The angry cognitions scale: a new inventory for assessing cognitions in anger. Journal of Rational-Emotive and Cognitive-Behavior Therapy, 25, 155–173.Google Scholar
Matson, J. L., Bamburg, J. W., Mayville, E. A., Pinkston, J., Bielecki, J., Kuhn, D., et al. (2000). Psychopharmacology and mental retardation: a 10 year review (1990–1999). Research in Developmental Disability, 21, 263–296.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mindham, J. and Espie, C. A. (2003). Glasgow Anxiety Scale for people with an Intellectual Disability (GAS-ID): development and psychometric properties of a new measure for use with people with mild intellectual disability. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 47, 22–30.Google Scholar
Nicoll, M., Beail, N. and Saxon, D. (2013). Cognitive behavioural treatments for anger in adults with intellectual disabilities: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 26, 47–62.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Novaco, R. (2003). The Novaco Anger Scale and Provocation Inventory Manual. Western Los Angeles, CA: Psychological Services.Google Scholar
Novaco, R. W. and Taylor, J. L. (2004). Assessment of anger and aggression in male offenders with developmental disabilities. Psychological Assessment, 14, 42–50.Google Scholar
Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric Theory (2nd ed). New York: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
Oathamshaw, S. C. and Haddock, G. (2006). Do people with intellectual disabilities and psychosis have the cognitive skills required to undertake cognitive behavioural therapy? Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disability, 19, 35–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rose, J., Willner, P., Shead, J., Jahoda, A., Gillespie, D., Townson, J., et al. (2013). Different factors influence self-reports and third-party reports of anger by adults with intellectual disabilities. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 26, 410–419.Google Scholar
Roth, A., Fonagy, P., Parry, G., Target, M. and Woods, R. (2006). What Works for Whom? A critical review of psychotherapy research (2nd ed.) New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Spielberger, C. D. (1999). Staxi-2: Stait-Trait Anger Expression Inventory-2; Professional Manual. Lutz, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.Google Scholar
Sturmey, P. (2006). On some recent claims for the efficacy of cognitive therapy for people with intellectual disabilities. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 19, 109–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tafrate, R. C., Kassinove, H. and Dundin, L. (2002). Anger episodes in high- and low-trait-anger community adults. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 58, 1575–1590.Google Scholar
Taylor, J. L. and Novaco, R. W. (2005). Anger Treatment for People with Developmental Disabilities. Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
Taylor, J. L., Novaco, R. W., Gillmer, B. T., Robertson, A. and Thorne, I. (2005). Individual cognitive-behavioural anger treatment for people with mild-borderline intellectual disabilities and histories of aggression: a controlled trial. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 44, 367–382.Google Scholar
Taylor, J. L., Novaco, R. W., Guinan, C. and Street, N. (2004). Development of an imaginal provocation test to evaluate treatment for anger problems in people with intellectual disabilities. Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, 11, 233–246.Google Scholar
Velten, E (1968). A laboratory task for induction of mood states. Behavioural Research and Therapy, 6, 473–482.Google Scholar
Vereenooghe, L. and Langdon, P. E. (2013). Psychological therapies for people with intellectual disabilities: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 34, 4085–4102.Google Scholar
Vereenooghe, L., Reynolds, S., Gega, L. and Langdon, P. E. (2015). Can a computerised training paradigm assist people with intellectual disabilities to learn cognitive mediation skills? A randomized experiment. Behavior Research and Therapy, 71, 10–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Willner, P. and Lindsay, W. R. (in press). Cognitive behaviour therapy. In Singh, N. (Ed.), Clinical Handbook of Evidence-Based Practices for Individuals with Intellectual Disabilities.Google Scholar
Willner, P. and Tomlinson, S. (2007). Generalization of anger-coping skills from day-service to residential settings. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 20, 553–562.Google Scholar
Willner, P., Brace, N. and Phillips, J. (2005). Assessment of anger coping skills in individuals with intellectual disabilities. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 49, 329–339.Google Scholar
Willner, P., Rose, J., Jahoda, A., Stenfert Kroese, B., Felce, D., Cohen, D., et al. (2013). Outcomes of a cluster-randomized controlled trial of a cognitive behavioural anger management intervention for people with intellectual disabilities. British Journal of Psychiatry, 202, 1–9.Google Scholar
Zanov, M. V. and Davison, G. C. (2010). A conceptual and empirical review of 25 years of cognitive assessment using the articulate thoughts in simulated situations (ATSS) think-aloud paradigm. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 34, 282–291.Google Scholar
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.