Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T05:52:00.887Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Alterations of Responsibility Beliefs Through Cognitive-Behavioural Group Therapy for Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 February 2011

Tadashi Haraguchi
Affiliation:
Chiba University Graduate School of Medicine, Japan
Eiji Shimizu*
Affiliation:
Chiba University Graduate School of Medicine, Japan
Hiroshi Ogura
Affiliation:
Asahi General Hospital, Chiba, Japan
Goro Fukami
Affiliation:
Chiba University Graduate School of Medicine, Japan
Mihisa Fujisaki
Affiliation:
Chiba University Graduate School of Medicine, Japan
Masaomi Iyo
Affiliation:
Chiba University Graduate School of Medicine, Japan
*
Reprint requests to Eiji Shimizu, Department of Integrative Neurophysiology (C2), Chiba University Graduate School of Medicine, Inohana 1-8-1, Chiba, 260–8670, Japan. E-mail: [email protected]

Abstract

Background: Inflated responsibility is the main feature of cognitive-behavioural models of obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD). However, few studies have examined the effect of cognitive-behavioural group therapy (CBGT) on inflated responsibility. Aim: The aim of this study was to examine the effect of CBGT on OCD symptoms and responsibility beliefs. Methods: Thirty-six subjects meeting Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th edition, criteria for OCD were recruited to CBGT, and 28 of them completed 12 sessions. Subjects were assessed using the Yale-Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Scale (Y-BOCS), the Responsibility Attitude Scale (RAS), and the Responsibility Interpretations Questionnaire (RIQ) at pre- and post-treatment. Results: Y-BOCS, RAS and RIQ (belief) scores were significantly improved at the end of the treatment. Conclusion: This study indicates that CBGT improves not only obsessive-compulsive symptoms but also inflated responsibility beliefs in patients with OCD.

Type
Brief Clinical Reports
Copyright
Copyright © British Association for Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapies 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anderson, R. A. and Rees, C. S. (2007). Group versus individual cognitive-behavioural treatment for obsessive-compulsive disorder: a controlled trial. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 45, 123137.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hamagaki, S., Takagi, S., Urushihara, Y., Ishisaka, Y. and Matsumoto, M. (1999). Development and use of the Japanese version of the self-report Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale. Seishin Shinkeigaku Zasshi, 101, 152168.Google ScholarPubMed
Jonsson, H. and Hougaard, E. (2009). Group cognitive behavioural therapy for obsessive-compulsive disorder: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavia, 119, 98106.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kojima, M., Furukawa, T. A., Takahashi, H., Kawai, M., Nagaya, T. and Tokudome, S. (2002). Cross-cultural validation of the Beck Depression Inventory-II in Japan. Psychiatry Research, 110, 291299.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Salkovskis, P. M., Wroe, A. L., Gledhill, A., Morrison, N., Forrester, E., Richards, C., et al. (2000). Responsibility attitudes and interpretations are characteristic of obsessive compulsive disorder. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 38, 347372.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Taylor, S., Abramowitz, J. S., McKay, D., Calamari, J. E., Sookman, D., Kyrios, M., et al. (2006). Do dysfunctional beliefs play a role in all types of obsessive-compulsive disorder? Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 20, 8597.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Supplementary material: File

Haraguchi Supplementary Material

Haraguchi Extended Report

Download Haraguchi Supplementary Material(File)
File 161.3 KB
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.