Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T11:05:08.505Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Teaching Age and Gender Discrimination by the Enhancement of Criterion-related Cues

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 June 2009

Jon C. Reading  and
Alastair K. Ager
Jon C. Reading
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Central Hospital, Hatton, South Warwickshire
Alastair K. Ager
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Leicester, Leicester
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Teaching procedures encouraging the “errorless” acquisition of discriminations through the enhancement of criterion-related cues have proved popular and effective in work with individuals with severe learning difficulties. To date, however, their application has primarily been restricted to the learning of relatively simple discriminations, such as size and colour. The present study describes the successful implementation using two adults with severe learning difficulties of a teaching programme adopting this approach with respect to the skills of age and gender discrimination. Along with encouraging generalization and maintenance data, this success suggests that procedures involving the enhancement of criterion-related cues may have utility with a far broader range of tasks than previously considered.

Type
Clinical Section
Information
Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy , Volume 18 , Issue 3 , July 1990 , pp. 207 - 219
Copyright
Copyright © British Association for Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapies 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ager, A. K. (1983 a). An Analysis of Learning and Attentional Processes in Mentally Handicapped Individuals. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of Wales.Google Scholar
Ager, A. K. (1983 b). The development of a microcomputer-based teaching system for mentally handicapped individuals.Proceedings of The Computer as an Aid for those with Special Needs.Sheffield: Sheffield City Polytechnic/Active.Google Scholar
Ager, A. K. (1986). Performance contoured programming: a structure for microcomputer-based teaching of individuals with severe learning difficulties. Programmed Learning and Educational Technology 23, 130–135.Google Scholar
Ager, A. K. (1987). Minimal intervention: a strategy for generalised behaviour change. Behavioural Psychotherapy 15, 16–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bruning, J. L. and Kintz, B. L. (1968). Computational Handbook of Statistics. Illinois: Scott Foresman and Co.Google Scholar
Etzel, B. C. and Leblanc, J. M. (1979). The simplest treatment alternative the law of parsimony applied to choosing appropriate instructional control and errorless learning procedures for the difficult-to-teach child. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders 9, 361–382.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hersen, M. and Barlow, D. (1976). Single Case Experimental Designs: Strategies for Studying Behavior Change. New York: Pergamon.Google Scholar
Jones, L. and Cullen, C. (1980). Errorless learning with the retarded: some further considerations. Journal of Practical Approaches to Developmental Handicaps 4, 18–22.Google Scholar
Katcher, A. (1955). The discrimination of sex differences in young children. Journal of Genetic Psychology 87, 131–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lambert, J-L. (1980). Stimulus fading procedures and discrimination learning by retarded children. In Advances in Mental Handicap Research Vol. 1. Hogg, J. and Mittler, P. (Eds) Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
Ray, B. A. and Sidman, M. (1970). Reinforcement schedules and stimulus control. In The Theory of Reinforcement Schedules. Schoenfield, W. N. (Ed.) New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.Google Scholar
Richmond, G. and Bell, B. (1983). Comparison of three methods to train a size discrimination with profoundly mentally retarded students. American Journal of Mental Deficiency 87, 574–576.Google Scholar
Rincover, A. (1978). Variables affecting stimulus fading and discriminative responding in psychotic children. Journal of Abnormal Psychology 87, 541–543.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schilmoeller, K. J. and Etzel, B. C. (1977). An experimental analysis of criterion-related and non-criterion-related cues in “errorless” stimulus control procedures. In New Developments in Behavioral Research—Theory, Method and Application. Etzel, B. C., Leblanc, J. M. and Baer, D. M. (Eds) New Jersey: Laurence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Sidman, M. and Stoddard, L. T. (1966). Programming perception and learning for retarded children. In International Review of Research in Mental Retardation Vol. 2, Ellis, N. R. (Ed.) New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Strand, S. C. and Morris, R. C. (1988). Criterion-related versus non-criterion-related prompt training with severely mentally handicapped children. Journal of Mental Deficiency Research, 32, 137–151.Google ScholarPubMed
Terrace, H. S. (1966). Stimulus control. In Conditioning: Areas of Research and Application. Honig, W. K. (Ed.) New Jersey: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Tennant, L., Cullen, C. and Hattersley, J. (1981). Applied behavioural analysis: intervention with retarded people. In Applications of Conditioning Theory. Davey, G. C. L. (Ed.) London: Methuen.Google Scholar
Zeaman, D. and House, B. (1963). The role of attention in retardate discrimination learning. In Handbook of Mental Deficiency. Ellis, N. R. (Ed.) New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.