Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T13:57:37.548Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Self-Discrepancy Monitoring and its Impact on Negative Mood: An Experimental Investigation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 May 2013

Gabriele Caselli ,
Alina Decsei-Radu ,
Francesca Fiore ,
Ciara Manfredi ,
Sara Querci ,
Sara Sgambati ,
Daniela Rebecchi ,
Giovanni M. Ruggiero  and
Sandra Sassaroli
Gabriele Caselli*
Affiliation:
London South Bank University, UK, and Studi Cognitivi, Milano, Italy
Alina Decsei-Radu
Affiliation:
University of Oradea, Romania
Francesca Fiore
Affiliation:
Studi Cognitivi, Milano, Italy
Ciara Manfredi
Affiliation:
Studi Cognitivi, Modena, and University of Pavia, Italy
Sara Querci
Affiliation:
Studi Cognitivi, Modena, Italy
Sara Sgambati
Affiliation:
Studi Cognitivi, Modena, Italy
Daniela Rebecchi
Affiliation:
Studi Cognitivi, and Servizio di Psicologia Clinica, Modena, Italy
Giovanni M. Ruggiero
Affiliation:
Studi Cognitivi, Milano, Italy
Sandra Sassaroli
Affiliation:
Studi Cognitivi, Milano, Italy
*
Reprint requests to Gabriele Caselli, Studi Cognitivi, Cognitive Psychotherapy School, Via Giardini 472/L, 41100 Modena, Italy, E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Background: The perception of self-discrepancies between the actual self and the ideal self has been defined as a cognitive risk factor for depression (Higgins, 1987). In this view, self-discrepancy monitoring (SDM) refers to the voluntary re-orientation of attention towards detecting discrepancies between ideal and actual selves, even in a positive situation. Aims: The goal of this study was to explore the impact of SDM on levels of mood in the face of positive stimuli. Method: Two clinical and two non-clinical samples were recruited from two different European countries (Italy and Romania). All participants were asked to focus on a past positive experience, and were then randomly allocated to one of two induction tasks. The experimental condition consisted of monitoring discrepancies between personal goals and the recalled positive experience, while the control condition consisted of observing what the participant was feeling. Results: The findings show that, after recalling a positive memory, SDM leads to a significant decrease in mood over a short period independent of the severity of depressive symptoms. This effect is partially mediated by the concurrent change in levels of brooding. Conclusions: Self-discrepancy monitoring in response to positive stimuli tends to lower current mood independent of the initial level of depressive symptoms, and seems to be a global trigger of emotional distress that does not refer only to a depressed cognitive style.

Keywords

Attentioncognitive processesdepressionmood disordersself-discrepancy
Type
Research Article
Information
Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy , Volume 42 , Issue 4 , July 2014 , pp. 464 - 478
Copyright
Copyright © British Association for Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapies 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abramson, L. Y., Metalsky, G. I., and Alloy, L. B. (1989). Hopelessness depression: a theory-based subtype of depression. Psychological Review, 96, 358–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beck, A. T. (1987). Cognitive models of depression. Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy, 1, 5–37.Google Scholar
Beck, A. T., Steer, R. A. and Garbin, M. G. (1988). Psychometric properties of the Beck Depression Inventory: twenty-five years of evaluation. Clinical Psychology Review, 8, 77–100.Google Scholar
Beck, A. T., Ward, C. H., Mendelson, M., Mock, J. and Erbaugh, J. (1961). An inventory for measuring depression. Archives of General Psychiatry, 4, 561–571.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Blysma, L. M., Morris, B. H. and Rottenberg, J. (2008). A meta-analysis of emotional reactivity in major depressive disorder. Clinical Psychological Review, 28, 676–691.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carver, C. S., Scheier, M. F. and Segerstrom, S. C. (2010). Optimism. Clinical Psychology Review, 30, 879–889.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
David, D. (2007). SCID-II. Interviul Clinic Structurat pentru Tulburările Clinice de pe Axa II a DSM. Cluj-Napoca: Romanian Psychological Testing Services.Google Scholar
David, D. and Dobrean, A. (2010). Inventarul de depresie Beck. Cluj-Napoca: Romanian Psychological Testing Services.Google Scholar
Dunn, B. D., Dalgleish, T., Lawrence, A. D., Cusack, R. and Ogilvie, A. D. (2004). Categorical and dimensional reports of experienced affect to emotion-inducing pictures in depression. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 113, 654–660.Google Scholar
Ekselius, L., Lindstrom, E., Von Knorring, L., Bodlund, O. and Kullgren, G. (1994). SCID-II interviews and the SCID screen questionnaire as diagnostic tools for personality disorders in DSM-III-R. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 90, 120–123.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fairbrother, N. and Moretti, M. (1998). Sociotropy, autonomy, and self-discrepancy: status in depressed, remitted depressed, and control participants. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 22, 279–296.Google Scholar
First, M. B., Spitzer, R. L., Gibbon, M. and Williams, J. B. W. (1995a). The structured clinical interview for DSM-III-R personality disorders (SCID-II), Part I: description. Journal of Personality Disorders, 9, 83–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
First, M. B., Spitzer, R. L., Gibbon, M., Williams, J. B. W., Davies, M., Borus, J., et al. (1995b). The structured clinical interview for DSM-III-R personality disorders (SCID-II). Part II: multi-site test-retest reliability study. Journal of Personality Disorders, 9, 92–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
First, M. B., Spitzer, R. L., Gibbon, M., and Williams, J. B. W. (1997). Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Axis I Disorders - Clinician Version: administration booklet. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Press.Google Scholar
Ghisi, M., Flebus, G. B., Montano, A., Sanavio, E. and Sica, C. (2006). Beck Depression Inventory-II: manuale. Firenze, Italy: Organizzazioni Speciali.Google Scholar
Hardin, E. E. and Lakin, J. L. (in press). The integrated self-discrepancy index: a reliable and valid measure of self-discrepancies. Journal of Personality Assessment.Google Scholar
Higgins, E. T. (1987). Self-discrepancy: a theory relating self and affect. Psychological Review, 94, 319–340.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jacobsberg, L., Perry, S. and Frances, A. (1995). Diagnostic agreement between the SCID-II screening questionnaire and the Personality Disorder Examination. Journal of Personality Assessment, 65, 428–433.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Just, N. and Alloy, L. B. (1997). The response styles theory of depression: tests and an extension of the theory. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 106, 221–229.Google Scholar
Klein, D. F. (1974). Endogenomorphic depression: a conceptual and terminological revision. Archives of General Psychiatry, 31, 447–454.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Larsen, R. J. and Prizmic, Z. (2008). Regulation of emotional well-being. In Eid, M. and Larsen, L. J. (Eds.), Subjective Well-being. New York: The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Mathews, A. and MacLeod, C. (1994). Cognitive approaches to emotion and emotional disorders. Annual Review of Psychology, 45, 25–50.Google Scholar
Mathews, A. and MacLeod, C. (2005). Cognitive vulnerability to emotional disorders. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 1, 167–195.Google Scholar
Mazzi, F., Morosini, P., De Girolamo, G. and Guaraldi, G. P. (2003). SCID-II. Interviste Cliniche Strutturate per il DSM-IV. Firenze, Italy: Organizzazioni Speciali.Google Scholar
Meehl, P. E. (1975). Hedonic capacity: some conjectures. Bulletin of the Menninger Clinic, 39, 295–307.Google Scholar
Nolan, S. A., Roberts, J. E. and Gotlib, I. H. (1998). Neuroticism and ruminative response style as predictors of change in depressive symptomatology. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 22, 445–455.Google Scholar
Nolen-Hoeksema, S. and Davis, C. G. (1999). Thanks for sharing that: ruminators and their social support networks. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 801–814.Google Scholar
Nolen-Hoeksema, S. and Morrow, J. (1991). A prospective study of depression and post-traumatic stress symptoms after a natural disaster: the 1989 Loma Prieta earthquake. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 115–121.Google Scholar
Nolen-Hoeksema, S. and Morrow, J. (1993). Effects of rumination and distraction on naturally occurring depressed mood. Cognition and Emotion, 7, 561–570.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ogilvie, D. M. and Clark, M. D. (1992). The best and worst of it: age and sex differences in self-discrepancy research. In Lipka, R. P. and Brinthaupt, T. M. (Eds.), Self-Perspectives across the Life Span (pp. 186–222). New York: State University.Google Scholar
Ouimette, P. C. and Klein, D. N. (1995). Test-retest stability, mood-state dependence, and informant-subject concordance of the SCID-Axis II Questionnaire in a nonclinical sample. Journal of Personality Disorders, 9, 105–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Palmieri, R., Gasparre, A. and Lanciano, T. (2007). Una misura disposizionale della ruminazione depressiva: la RRS di Nolen-Hoeksema e Morrow. Psychofenia, X, 17, 15–33.Google Scholar
Preacher, K. J. and Hayes, A. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40, 879–891.Google Scholar
Roelofs, J., Papageorgiou, C., Gerber, R. D., Huibers, M., Peeters, F. and Arntz, A. (2007). On the links between self-discrepancies, rumination, metacognitions, and symptoms of depression in undergraduates. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 45, 1295–1305.Google Scholar
Scheier, M. F., Carver, C. S. and Bridges, M. W. (1994). Distinguishing optimism from neuroticism (and trait anxiety, self-mastery, and self-esteem): a re-evaluation of the Life Orientation Test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 1063–1078.Google Scholar
Schwartz, G. E., Fair, P. L., Salt, P., Mandel, M. R. and Klerman, G. L. (1976). Facial muscle patterning to affective imagery in depressed and nondepressed subjects. Science, 192, 489–491.Google Scholar
Scott, L. and O'Hara, M. W. (1993). Self-discrepancies in clinically anxious and depressed university students. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 102, 282–287.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sloan, D. M., Strauss, M. E., Quirk, S. W. and Sajatovic, M. (1997). Subjective and expressive emotional responses in depression. Journal of Affective Disorders, 46, 135–141.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sloan, D. M., Strauss, M. E. and Wisner, K. L. (2001). Diminished response to pleasant stimuli by depressed women. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 110, 488–493.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Strauman, T. J. (1996). Stability within the self: a longitudinal study of the implications of self-discrepancy theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 1142–1153.Google Scholar
Treynor, W., Gonzalez, R. and Nolen-Hoeksema, S. (2003). Rumination reconsidered: a psychometric analysis. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 27, 247–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watkins, E., Teasdale, J. D. and Williams, R. M. (2000). Decentring and distraction reduce overgeneral autobiographical memory in depression. Psychological Medicine, 30, 911–920.Google Scholar
Wegner, D. M., Eich, E. and Bjork, R. A. (1994). Thought suppression. In Druckman, D. and Bjork, R. A. (Eds.), Learning, Remembering, Believing: enhancing human performance (pp.277–293). Washington, DC: National Academy.Google Scholar
Wells, A. (2008). Metacognitive Therapy for Anxiety and Depression. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.