Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T03:07:57.847Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Paranoia in the Therapeutic Relationship in Cognitive Behavioural Therapy for Psychosis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 March 2014

Caroline Lawlor ,
Katherine Hall  and
Lyn Ellett
Caroline Lawlor
Affiliation:
Royal Holloway, University of London, Egham, UK
Katherine Hall
Affiliation:
Royal Holloway, University of London, Egham, UK
Lyn Ellett*
Affiliation:
Royal Holloway, University of London, Egham, UK
*
Reprint requests to Lyn Ellett, Department of Psychology, Royal Holloway, University of London, Egham, Surrey TW20 0EX, UK. e-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Background and aims: This study explored therapists’ and clients’ experiences of paranoia about the therapist in cognitive behaviour therapy. Method: Ten therapists and eight clients engaged in cognitive behaviour therapy for psychosis were interviewed using a semi-structured interview. Data were analyzed using thematic analysis. Results: Clients reported experiencing paranoia about their therapist, both within and between therapy sessions. Therapists’ accounts highlighted a number of dilemmas that can arise in responding to clients’ paranoia about them. Conclusions: The findings highlight helpful ways of working with clients when they become paranoid about their therapist, and emphasize the importance of developing a therapeutic relationship that is radically collaborative, supporting a person-based approach to distressing psychotic experience.

Keywords

Therapeutic relationshipparanoiaperson-based cognitive therapycognitive behaviour therapy for psychosisradical collaboration
Type
Research Article
Information
Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy , Volume 43 , Issue 4 , July 2015 , pp. 490 - 501
Copyright
Copyright © British Association for Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapies 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

American Psychiatric Association (APA) (1994). Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (4th ed.) Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association.Google Scholar
Bentall, R. P., Lewis, S., Tarrier, N., Haddock, G., Drake, R. and Day, J. (2003). Relationships matter: the impact of the therapeutic alliance on outcome in schizophrenia. Schizophrenia Research, 60, 319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berry, C. and Hayward, M. (2011). What can qualitative research tell us about service user perspectives of CBT for psychosis? A synthesis of current evidence. Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy, 39, 487–494.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Boyatzis, R. E. (1998). Transforming Qualitative Information: thematic analysis and code development. Thousand Oaks: SAGE.Google Scholar
Boyd, T. and Gumley, A. (2007). An experiential perspective on persecutory paranoia: a grounded theory construction. Psychology and Psychotherapy: Theory, Research and Practice, 80, 1–22.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Braun, V. and Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3, 77–101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Castonguay, L. G., Constantino, M. J. and Grosse-Holtforth, M. (2006). The working alliance: where are we and where should we go? Psychotherapy: Theory, Research, Practice and Training, 43, 271–279.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Castonguay, L. G., Boswell, J. F., Constantino, M. J., Goldfried, M. R. and Hill, C. E. (2010). Training implications of harmful effects of psychological treatments. American Psychologist, 65, 34–49.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chadwick, P. D. J. (2006). Person-Based Cognitive Therapy for Distressing Psychosis. West Sussex: Wiley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chadwick, P. D. J., Birchwood, M. and Trower, P. (1996). Cognitive Therapy for Delusions, Voices and Paranoia. Chichester: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
Dilks, S., Tasker, F. and Wren, B. (2012). Conceptualizing the therapist's role in therapy in psychosis. Psychology and Psychotherapy: Theory, Research and Practice. doi 10.1111/j.2044–8341.2011.02061.xGoogle ScholarPubMed
Evans-Jones, C., Peters, E. and Barker, C. (2009). The therapeutic relationship in CBT for psychosis: client, therapist and therapy factors. Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy, 37, 527–540.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fowler, D., Garety, P. and Kuipers, E. (1995). Cognitive Behaviour Therapy for Psychosis. Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
Freeman, D. and Garety, P. A. (2000). Comments on the content of persecutory delusions: does the definition need clarification? British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 39, 407–414.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hill, C.E. and Knox, S. (2009). Processing the therapeutic relationship. Psychotherapy Research, 19, 13–29.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hutton, P. and Morrison, A. P. (2012). Collaborative empiricism in cognitive therapy for psychosis: a practice guide. Cognitive and Behavioural Practice. doi:10.1016/j.cbpra.2012.08.003Google Scholar
Joffe, H. and Yardley, L. (2004). Content and thematic analysis. In Marks, D. and Yardley, L. (Eds.), Methods in Health Psychology. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Kingdon, D. G. and Turkington, D. (2008). Cognitive Therapy of Schizophrenia: guides to evidence-based practice. (Series ed: Persons, J.). New York: Guilford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Legard, R., Keegan, J. and Ward, K. (2003). In-depth interviews. In Ritchie, J. and Lewis, J. (Eds.), Qualitative Research Practice: a guide for social science students and researchers (pp.138–169). London: SAGE.Google Scholar
Mays, N. and Pope, C. (1995) Qualitative research: observational methods in health care settings. British Medical Journal, 311, 182–184.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McGowan, J. F., Lavender, T. and Garety, P. A. (2005). Factors in outcome of cognitive-behavioural therapy for psychosis: users’ and clinicians’ views. Psychological Psychotherapy, 78, 513–29.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Safran, J. D. and Muran, J. C. (1996). The resolution of ruptures in the therapeutic alliance. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 64, 447–458.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Safran, J. D., Muran, J. C. and Eubanks-Carter, C. (2011). Repairing alliance ruptures. In Norcross, J.C. (Ed.), Psychotherapy Relationships That Work: evidence-based responsiveness (2nd ed.) (pp. 224–238). New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stevens, C. L., Muran, C. and Safran, J. D. (2003). Obstacles or opportunities? A relational approach to negotiating alliance ruptures. In Leahy, R. L. (Ed.), Roadblocks in CBT: transforming challenges into opportunities to change (pp. 274–294). London: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Svensson, B. and Hansson, L. (1999). Relationships among patient and therapist ratings of therapeutic alliance and patient assessment of therapeutic process: a study of cognitive therapy with long term mentally ill patients. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 87, 579–585.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wittorf, A., Jakobi, U. E., Bannert, K. K., Bechdolf, A., Müller, B. W., Sartory, G., et al. (2010). Does the cognitive dispute of psychotic symptoms do harm to the therapeutic alliance? Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 198, 478–485.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.