Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T01:08:46.790Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Naturalistic Change in Nonclinical Paranoid Experiences

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 January 2014

Rhani Allen-Crooks
Affiliation:
Royal Holloway, University of London, UK
Lyn Ellett*
Affiliation:
Royal Holloway, University of London, UK
*
Reprint requests to Lyn Ellett, Department of Psychology, Royal Holloway, University of London, Egham, Surrey, UK. E-mail: [email protected]

Abstract

Background: Numerous studies have shown that paranoia is common in the nonclinical population; however, little research has examined whether nonclinical paranoid beliefs change over time, or considered potential reasons for change. Aims: The aim of the present study was therefore to examine naturalistic change in nonclinical paranoid experiences. Method: 60 participants described an idiosyncratic experience of paranoia, including when it occurred, and rated their experience along four key belief dimensions: preoccupation, impact, distress and conviction. Participants provided two ratings for each dimension, retrospective recall at the time of the occurrence of the paranoid event, and again at the time of the interview. Participants were also asked to provide qualitative descriptions of reasons for change in belief dimensions. Results: Participants described paranoid experiences that had occurred over a large timeframe (1 day-25 years). Reductions across all four belief dimensions were found, and seven key themes emerged following qualitative analysis of the participants’ reason for change in response to the paranoid event. Conclusions: The findings highlight a number of factors associated with reported naturalistic changes in belief dimensions of conviction, distress, preoccupation and impact, which might be useful in enhancing interventions for clinical and nonclinical paranoia, and in helping to build models to account for why people showing clear paranoid ideation do, or do not, go on to develop clinical paranoia.

Type
Brief Clinical Reports
Copyright
Copyright © British Association for Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapies 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Braun, V. and Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3, 77101.Google Scholar
Chadwick, P. and Birchwood, M. (1994). The omnipotence of voices: a cognitive approach to auditory hallucinations. British Journal of Psychiatry, 164, 190201.Google Scholar
Chadwick, P. D., Hughes, S., Russell, D., Russell, I. and Dagnan, D. (2009). Mindfulness for distressing voices and paranoia: a replication and randomized feasibility trial. Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy, 37, 403412.Google Scholar
Chadwick, P. D. and Lowe, C. F. (1994). A cognitive approach to measuring and modifying delusions. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 32, 355367.Google Scholar
Ellett, L., Allen-Crooks, R., Stevens, A., Wildschut, T. and Chadwick, P. D. (2013). A paradigm for the study of paranoia in the general population: the Prisoner's Dilemma Game. Cognition and Emotion, 27, 5362.Google Scholar
Ellett, L. and Chadwick, P. (2007). Paranoid cognitions, failure, and focus of attention in college students. Cognition and Emotion, 21, 558576.Google Scholar
Ellett, L., Lopes, B. and Chadwick, P. (2003). Paranoia in a non-clinical population of college students. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 191, 425430.Google Scholar
Freeman, D., Pugh, K., Antley, A., Slater, M., Bebbington, P., Gittins, M., et al. (2008). Virtual reality study of paranoid thinking in the general population. The British Journal of Psychiatry, 192, 258263.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thewissen, V., Bentall, R. P., Oorschot, M., Campo, J., van Lierop, T., van Os, J., et al. (2011). Emotions, self-esteem and paranoid episodes: an experience sampling study. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 50, 178195.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.