Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T11:12:10.642Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The evolution of a token economy in a Residential School for Maladjusted Junior Boys

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 June 2009

J. R. Burland
J. R. Burland
Affiliation:
Chelfham Mill School, Barnstaple, N. Devon
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Chelfham Mill School, Barnstaple, Devon, is a residential school designed on behavioural principles. (Burland, 1976). It is an independent residential school for 46 maladjusted boys aged 7–12 years with I.Q. range 70–95. The boys are referred through child guidance clinics and maintained by local education authorities. The staff consists of an educational psychologist, headteacher, deputy headteacher, social worker, 5 assistant teachers and 9 residential therapists. They have all been trained to use behaviour modification techniques and many of the staff have built up considerable practical expertise since the school was established in 1966.

Type
Research Article
Information
Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy , Volume 6 , Issue 4 , October 1978 , pp. 97 - 104
Copyright
Copyright © British Association for Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapies 1978

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ayllon, T. & Houghton, E. (1965). Control of the behaviour of schizophrenic patients by food. Journal of the experimental Analysis of Behaviour: Vol. 2.Google Scholar
Blackham, G. J. & Silberman, A. (1971). Modification of Child Behaviour. Belmont, Calif.: Wadsworth Publishing Co., Inc.Google Scholar
Brown, B. (1977). Gilby House: A Token Economy Management Scheme in a residential school for adolescent boys in trouble. British Association for Behavioural Psychotherapy Bulletin, Vol. 5, 3.Google Scholar
Burland, J. R. (1970). Symposium: “Shared Responsibility” IV. Shared responsibility at Chelfham Mill School. Therapeutic Education, Autumn.Google Scholar
Burland, J. R. (1976). Fewer Shades of Grey. 16mm film. Chelfham Mill School, Barnstaple, Devon: Viaduct Productions.Google Scholar
Burland, J. R., Brown, T. W. & Mendham, R. P. (1977). Steps to Self-sufficiency. Manual and Checklist. Chelfham Mill School, Barnstaple, Devon: Viaduct Productions.Google Scholar
Burland, J. R. & Burland, P. M. (1978). The Nature of Tokens: A Preliminary Study —Association for the Behaviour Modification with Children. Newsletter, Vol. 2, 1.Google Scholar
Burland, J. R. & Mather, M. R. (1977). The effect of introducing token earnings on the post-programme maintenance of areas of behaviour considered at a satisfactory level at the pre-programme stage. Association for Behaviour Modification with Children. Newsletter, Vol. 1, 3.Google Scholar
Forehand, R., Roberts, M. W.Doleys, D. M., Hobbs, S. A. & Resick, P. A. (1976). An examination of Disciplinary Procedures with Children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, Vol. 21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hewett, F. M. (1968). The emotionally Disturbed Child in the Classroom. Boston: Allyn & Bacon, Inc.Google Scholar
Kazdin, A. E. & Bootzin, R. R. (1972). The Token Economy: An evaluation review. Journal of Applied Behaviour Analysis, Vol. 5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuypers, D. S., Becker, W. C. & O'Leary, K. D. (1968). How to make a token system fail. Exceptional Children, Vol. 35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Macmillan, D. L. (1973). Behaviour Modification in Education. New York: The Macmillan Company.Google Scholar
O'Leary, K. D. & Drabman, R. (1971). Token Reinforcement Programmes in the Classroom: A review. Psychological Bulletin, Vol. 75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Staats, A. W., Finley, J. R., Minke, K. A. & Wolf, M. M. (1964). Reinforcement Variables in the Control of Unit Reading Responses. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behaviour, Vol. 7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Walker, H. M. & Buckley, N. K. (1974). Token Reinforcement Techniques. Eugene, Oregon: E-B Press.Google Scholar
Walker, H. M., Fiegenbaum, W. E., & Hops, H. (1971). Components Analysis and Systematic Replication of a Treatment Model for Modifying Deviant Classroom Behaviour. Report No. 5, Center at Oregon for Research in the Behavioural Education of the Handicapped. Eugene, Oregon: University of Oregon.Google Scholar
Walker, H. M.Hops, H. & Johnson, S. M. (1975). Generalisation and Maintenance of Classroom Treatment Effects. Behaviour Therapy, Vol. 2.Google Scholar
Walker, H. M., Mattson, R. H. & Buckley, N. K. (1971). The functional analysis of behaviour with an experimental class setting. In Becker, W. C. (Ed.). An empirical basis for change in education. Chicago: Science Research Associates.Google Scholar
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.