No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Ethics, Procedures and Contingency Management
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 16 June 2009
Extract
The recognition that psychological theories, and methods of behaviour change derived from them, are value laden seems to be relatively recent. Vine (1977) has commented on the fact that ethical questions receive the least attention of any topic area in psychology examination questions. He believes that psychologists “are evidently impervious to all those many critics of psychology who object to our irresponsible methodologies, to our philosophical ignorance in recognising that data are theory-laden, and to our frequent and unrecognised prostitution of our discipline” (Vine, 1977, p.377). In view of attempts at restriction of behaviour modification practice already made in the United States and in Britain, it becomes a professional necessity, not a mere armchair luxury, to assess the ethical status of behaviour modification procedures.
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © British Association for Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapies 1978
References
Braun, S. H. (1975). Ethical issues in behavior modification. Behavior Therapy, 6, 51–62.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
British Association for Behavioural Psychotherapy (1975). Ethics and behaviour modification. Bulletin of the British Association for Behavioural Psychotherapy, 3, 23–27.Google Scholar
Department of Health and Social Security (1973). Report of the Professional investigation into medical and nursing practices on certain wards at Napsbury Hospital, nr. St. Albans. London: Her Majesty's Stationery Office.Google Scholar
Department of Health and Social Security (1975). Supervision of the ethics of clinical research investigations. Health Service Circular (Interim Series) 153.Google Scholar
Florida Division of Retardation and Florida State University (1974). Guidlines for the use of behavioral procedures in state hospitals for the retarded. Unpublished report.Google Scholar
Hall, J. N., Baker, R. D., and Hutchinson, K. (1977). A controlled evaluation of token economy procedures with chronic schizophrenic patients. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 15, 261–283.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Halleck, S. L. (1974). Legal and ethical aspects of behavior control. American Journal of Psychatry, 131, 381–385.Google Scholar
International Council of Nurses1 (1965). International Code of Nursing Ethics.Grand Council Meeting,Frankfurt, Germany.Google Scholar
Leung, F. L. (1975). The Ethics and scope of behaviour modification. Bulletin of the British Psychological Society, 28, 376–379.Google Scholar
Minnesota State Department of Public Welfare (1970). Behavior Modification Guidelines. Office Memorandum, Medical Services Division, Minnesota State.Google Scholar
Pappworth, M. H. (1978). Medical ethical committees: A review of their function. World Medicine, 02 22, 19–21, 57–78.Google Scholar
Presley, A. S. (1976). Token economies: I wasn't trained for this. Bulletin of the British Association for Behavioural Psychotherapy, 4, 63–66.Google Scholar
Stolz, S. B. (1977). Why no guidelines for behavior modification? Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 10, 541–547.Google Scholar
Vine, I. (1977). What we teach—and don't teach—to psychology students. Bulletin of the British Psychological Society, 30, 376–377.Google Scholar
Wexler, D. B. (1973). Token and taboo: Behavior modification, token economies, and the law. California Law Review, 61, 81–109.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wyatt, v Stickney, (1972). 344 Federal Supplement 373 and 387, Middle District, Northern Division, Alabama.Google Scholar
Comments
No Comments have been published for this article.