Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T16:15:57.788Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Effectiveness of Group and Individual Formats of a Combined Motivational Interviewing and Cognitive Behavioral Treatment Program for Problem Gambling: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 February 2010

Tian P. S. Oei*
Affiliation:
The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
Namrata Raylu
Affiliation:
The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
Leanne M. Casey
Affiliation:
Griffith University, Brisbane, Australia
*
Reprint requests to Tian P. S. Oei, School of Psychology, University Queensland, St Lucia, Brisbane, NSW 4072, Australia. E-mail: [email protected] An extended version is also available online in the table of contents for this issue: http://journals.cambridge.org/jid_BCP

Abstract

Background: The study aimed to assess the effectiveness of group and individual formats of a combined motivational interviewing and cognitive behavioral treatment (CBT) program for problem gamblers (PGs) using a randomized controlled design. Method: One hundred and two PGs were randomly assigned to individual or group CBT conditions. Twenty-eight of these participants were randomly allocated to a 6-week waitlist control condition prior to receiving the designated treatment. Results: At post-treatment, there were significant improvements in all dependent variables (frequency and amount gambled, gambling urges, gambling cognitions, negative psychological states, and life satisfaction) for both the treatment conditions but not for the waitlist condition. Individuals that completed the individual (compared to group) treatment condition generally had higher effect sizes for gambling correlates. Therapeutic gains for gambling correlates were generally maintained at 6-month follow-up. Conclusions: A combined motivational interviewing and CBT program applied in group or individual format can improve PG behaviors, as well as gambling correlates.

Type
Brief Clinical Reports
Copyright
Copyright © British Association for Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapies 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Diener, E., Emmons, R., Larsen, R. and Griffin, S. (1985). The satisfaction with life scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49, 7175.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dowling, N., Smith, D. and Thomas, T. (2007). A comparison of individual and group cognitive-behavioural treatment for female pathological gambling. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 45, 21922202.Google Scholar
Echeburua, E., Baez, C. and Fernandez-Montalvo, J. (1996). Comparative effectiveness of three therapeutic modalities in the psychological treatment of pathological gambling: long-term outcome. Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy, 24, 5172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lovibond, S. H. and Lovibond, P. F. (1995). Manual for the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales (2nd Ed.). Sydney: Psychology Foundation.Google Scholar
Raylu, N. and Oei, T. P. S. (in press). A Cognitive Behavioral Therapy Program for Problem Gambling: therapists manual. Routledge.Google Scholar
Raylu, N. and Oei, T. P. S. (2004a). The Gambling Related Cognitions Scale (GRCS): development, confirmatory factor validation and psychometric properties. Addiction, 99, 757769.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Raylu, N. and Oei, T. P. S. (2004b). The Gambling Urge Scale (GUS): development, confirmatory factor validation and psychometric properties. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 18, 100105.Google Scholar
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.