Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T01:26:05.109Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Development and Evaluation of the Psychometric Properties of the Negative Beliefs about Post-Event Processing Scale

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 June 2017

Hayley Rodriguez ,
Kellie Kissell ,
Lloyd Lucas  and
Brian Fisak
Hayley Rodriguez
Affiliation:
University of Central Florida
Kellie Kissell
Affiliation:
University of Central Florida
Lloyd Lucas
Affiliation:
University of Central Florida
Brian Fisak*
Affiliation:
University of Central Florida
*
Correspondence to Brian Fisak, University of Central Florida, Sanford/Lake Mary Campus, Partnership Center, Suite 4020, 100 Weldon Blvd, Sanford, FL 32773, USA, E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Background: Although negative beliefs have been found to be associated with worry symptoms and depressive rumination, negative beliefs have yet to be examined in relation to post-event processing and social anxiety symptoms. Aims: The purpose of the current study was to examine the psychometric properties of the Negative Beliefs about Post-Event Processing Questionnaire (NB-PEPQ). Method: A large, non-referred undergraduate sample completed the NB-PEPQ along with validation measures, including a measure of post-event processing and social anxiety symptoms. Results: Based on factor analysis, a single-factor model was obtained, and the NB-PEPQ was found to exhibit good validity, including positive associations with measures of post-event processing and social anxiety symptoms. Conclusions: These findings add to the literature on the metacognitive variables that may lead to the development and maintenance of post-event processing and social anxiety symptoms, and have relevant clinical applications.

Keywords

Social phobiasocial anxietymetacognitive beliefsnegative beliefspositive beliefspost-event processing
Type
Research Article
Information
Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy , Volume 45 , Issue 6 , November 2017 , pp. 590 - 599
Copyright
Copyright © British Association for Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapies 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Brozovich, F. and Heimberg, R. G. (2008). An analysis of post-event processing in social anxiety disorder. Clinical Psychology Review, 28, 891–903. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2008.01.002 Google Scholar
Clark, D. M. (2001). A cognitive perspective on social phobia. In Crozier, W. R. and Alden, L. E. (eds), International Handbook of Social Anxiety: Concepts, Research and Interventions Relating to the Self and Shyness, pp. 405–430. New York, NY: John Wiley and Sons Ltd.Google Scholar
Clark, D. M. and Wells, A. (1995). A cognitive model of social phobia. In Heimberg, R. G. (eds), Social Phobia: Diagnosis, Assessment and Treatment, pp. 69–93. New York, NY: The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Conner, K. M., Davidson, J. R. T., Churchill, L. E., Sherwood, A., Weisler, R. H. and Foa, E. (2000). Psychometric properties of the social phobia inventory (SPIN). British Journal of Psychiatry, 176, 379–386. doi: 10.1192/bjp.176.4.379.Google Scholar
Dannahy, L. and Stopa, L. (2007). Post-event processing in social anxiety. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 45, 1207–1219. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2006.08.017 Google Scholar
Fehm, L., Schneider, G. and Hoyer, J. (2007). Is post-event processing specific for social anxiety? Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 38, 11–22. doi: 10.1016/j.jbtep.2006.02.004 Google Scholar
Fehm, L., Hoyer, J., Schneider, G., Lindemann, C. and Klusmann, U. (2008). Assessing post-event processing after social situations: A measure based on the cognitive model for social phobia. Anxiety, Stress and Coping: An International Journal, 21, 129–142. doi: 10.1080/10615800701424672 Google Scholar
Fisak, B. J. and Hammond, A. N. (2013). Are positive beliefs about post-event processing related to social anxiety? Behaviour Change, 30, 36–47. doi: 10.1017/bec.2013.4 Google Scholar
Helbig-Lang, S., Poels, V. and Lincoln, T. M. (2016). Performance perceptions and self-focused attention predict post-event processing after a real-life social performance situation. Anxiety, Stress and Coping: An International Journal, 29, 708–715. doi: 10.1080/10615806.2016.1157168 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kocovski, N. L., Endler, N. S., Rector, N. A. and Flett, G. L. (2005). Ruminative coping and post-event processing in social anxiety. Behavior Research and Therapy, 43, 971–984. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2004.06.015 Google Scholar
McEnvoy, P. M. and Kingsep, P. (2006). The post-event processing questionnaire in a clinical sample with social phobia. Behavior Research and Therapy, 44, 1689–1697. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2005.12.005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McEnvoy, P. M., Mahoney, A., Perini, S. J. and Kingsep, P. (2009). Changes in post-event processing and metacognitions during cognitive behavioral therapy for social phobia. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 23, 617–623. doi: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2009.01.011 Google Scholar
Oppenheimer, D. M., Meyvis, T. and Davidenko, N. (2009). Instructional manipulation checks: Detecting satisficing to increase statistical power. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45, 867–872. doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2009.03.009 Google Scholar
Papageorgiou, C. and Wells, A. (2001a). Metacognitive beliefs about rumination in recurrent major depression. Cognitive and Behavioral Practice, 8, 160–164. doi: 10.1016/S1077-7229(01)80021-3 Google Scholar
Papageorgiou, C. and Wells, A. (2001b). Positive beliefs about depressive rumination: Development and preliminary validation of a self-report scale. Behavior Therapy, 32, 13–26. doi: 005-7894/01/0013~02651 Google Scholar
Papageorgiou, C. and Wells, A. (2003). An empirical test of a clinical metacognitive model of rumination and depression. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 27, 261–273.Google Scholar
Penney, E. S. and Abbott, M. J. (2014). Anticipatory and post-event rumination in social anxiety disorder: A review of the theoretical and empirical literature. Behaviour Change, 31, 79–101. doi: 10.1017/bec.2014.3 Google Scholar
Rachman, S., Gruter-Andrew, J. and Shafran, R. (2000). Post-event processing in social anxiety. Behavior Research and Therapy, 38, 611–617.Google Scholar
Radomsky, A. S., Ashbaugh, A. R., Saxe, M. L., Ouimet, A. J., Golden, E. R., Lavoie, S. L. and O'Connor, K. P. (2006). Psychometric properties of the French and English versions of the Social Phobia Inventory. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science/Revue Canadienne Des Sciences Du Comportement, 38, 354–360. doi: 10.1037/cjbs2006021 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shikatani, B., Antony, M. M., Cassin, S. E. and Kuo, J. R. (2016). Examining the role of perfectionism and intolerance of uncertainty in post-event processing in social anxiety disorder. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 38, 297–306. doi: 10.1007/s10862-015-9516-8 Google Scholar
Watkins, E. R. (2008). Constructive and unconstructive repetitive thought. Psychological Bulletin, 134, 163–206. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.134.2.163 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wells, A. (1995). Meta-cognition and worry: A cognitive model of generalized anxiety disorder. Behavioral and Cognitive Psychotherapy, 23, 301–320.Google Scholar
Wells, A. (2006). The metacognitive model of worry and generalised anxiety disorder. In Davey, G. L. and Wells, A. (eds), Worry and its Psychological Disorders: Theory, Assessment and Treatment, pp. 179–199. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley Publishing.Google Scholar
Wong, Q. J. J. (2015). Psychometric evaluation of the English version of the Extended Post-event Processing Questionnaire. Anxiety, Stress and Coping: An International Journal, 28, 215–225. doi: 10.1080/10615806.2014.925546 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wong, Q. J. J. and Moulds, M. L. (2010). Do socially anxious individuals hold positive metacognitive beliefs about rumination? Behavior Change, 27, 69–83. doi: 10.1375/bech.27.2.69 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.