Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T13:40:41.215Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Detail and Elaboration in Phobic Imagery

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 June 2009

Fraser N. Watts ,
Robert Sharrock  and
Lorna Trezise
Fraser N. Watts
Affiliation:
MRC Applied Psychology Unit, Cambridge
Robert Sharrock
Affiliation:
MRC Applied Psychology Unit, Cambridge
Lorna Trezise
Affiliation:
MRC Applied Psychology Unit, Cambridge
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

It is hypothesized that phobics have cognitive representations of phobic stimuli that are relatively lacking in detail and elaboration, and that this is reflected in imagery relating to them. In a study of verbal imagery for coping with a spider, the accounts of phobics were found to be briefer and to include fewer stages. In a study of stimulus imagery, vividness was separated into its two components of (a) awareness of the image and (b) degree of detail, following a similar distinction proposed by Klinger. Awareness, but not detail, was found to be greater in phobics, though the hypothesis of less detail in phobics was not confirmed. It is suggested that a lack of elaboration of phobic imagery is likely to impede anxiety reduction in imaginal desensitization, and to reduce the effectiveness of imaginal representations of coping behaviour.

Type
Research Article
Information
Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy , Volume 14 , Issue 2 , April 1986 , pp. 115 - 123
Copyright
Copyright © British Association for Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapies 1986

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anderson, M. P. (1981). Assessment of imaginal processes: Approaches and issues. In Cognitive Assessment, Merluzzi, T. V., Glass, C. R. and Genest, M. (Eds), New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Block, N. (1981). Imagery. London: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Borkovec, T. D. and Sides, J. K. (1979). The contribution of relaxation and expectancy to fear reduction via graded imaginal exposure to feared stimuli. Behaviour Research and Therapy 17, 529–540.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kazdin, A. E. (1975). Covert modelling, imagery assessment and assertive behaviour. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 43, 716–724.Google Scholar
Klinger, E. (1978). Dimensions of thought and imagery in normal waking states. Journal of Altered States of Consciousness 4, 97–113.Google Scholar
Landau, R. J. (1980). The role of semantic schemata in phobic word interpretation. Cognitive Therapy and Research 4, 427–434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lang, P. J. (1977). Imagery in therapy: an information-processing analysis of fear. Behavior Therapy 8, 862–886.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lang, P. J. (1979). A bio-informational theory of emotional imagery. Psychophysiology 17, 179–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lang, P. J. (1984). Cognition in emotion: concept and action. In Emotions, Cognition and Behaviour, Izard, C. E., Kagan, J. and Zajonc, R. B. (Eds), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lang, P. J., Melamed, B. G. and Hart, J. H. (1970). A psychophysiological analysis of fear modification using an automated desensitization procedure. Journal of Abnormal Psychology 76, 220–234.Google Scholar
Marzillier, J. S., Caroll, D. and Newland, J. R. (1979). Self-report and physiological changes accompanying repeated imagining of a phobic scene. Behaviour Research and Therapy 17, 71–77.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McLemore, C. (1976). Factorial validity of imagery measures. Behaviour Research and Therapy 14, 399–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Powell, G. E. (1973). Transfer of imaginal desensitisation: Two analyses in terms of mental practice and the acquisition of expectations. M. Phil, dissertation, University of London.Google Scholar
Pylyshyn, Z. W. (1973). What the mind's eye tells the mind's brain. Psychological Bulletin 80, 1–24.Google Scholar
Strosahl, K. D. and Ascough, J. C. (1981). Clinical uses of mental imagery: experimental foundations, theoretical misconceptions and research issues. Psychological Bulletin 89, 422–438.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Suinn, R. M. (1983). Imagery and sports. In Imagery: Current Theory, Research and Application, Sheikh, A. A. (Ed), New York: John Wiley.Google Scholar
Watts, F. N. (1974). The control of spontaneous recovery of anxiety in imaginal desensitisation. Behaviour Research and Therapy 12, 57–59.Google Scholar
Watts, F. N. and Sharrock, R. (1984). Questionnaire dimensions of spider phobia. Behaviour Research and Therapy 22, 575–580.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Watts, F. N. and Sharrock, R. (1985). Correlations between spider constructs in phobics. British Journal of Medical Psychology 58, 149–153.Google Scholar
Watts, F. N., Trezise, L. and Sharrock, R. (1986). Processing of phobic stimuli. Manuscript submitted for publication.Google Scholar
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.