Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T08:20:33.318Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Applied Behaviour Analysis and Normalization: Reason, Rhetoric and Rationality

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 June 2009

Steve Baldwin
Steve Baldwin
Affiliation:
Consultant Psychologist, General Hospital, Visiting Research Fellow, Department of Psychology, Polytechnic Southwest, St. Helier, Jersey, Channel Islands
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Single definitions of complex terms do not exist. Previous authors have identified one possible translation of “rapprochement”. Equally, other definitions exist: “to bring together, to approach” (Webster's Collegiate) or “a drawing together” (Chamber's Concise).

Type
Research Article
Information
Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy , Volume 17 , Issue 4 , October 1989 , pp. 314 - 315
Copyright
Copyright © British Association for Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapies 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Baldwin, S. (1985). Sheep in Wolf's Clothing: Impact of normalization teaching on human services and service providers, International Journal of Rehabilitation Research, 8(2), 131–142.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baldwin, S. (1989). Applied behaviour analysis and normalization: New carts for old horses? A commentary, Behavioural Psychotherapy, 17, 305–308.Google Scholar
Baldwin, S., Stowers, C. (1987). Normalization and elderly persons: In whose best interests? American Archives of Rehabilitation Therapy, 35(1), 34–42.Google Scholar
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.