Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-02T16:53:12.318Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

An Electronic System for Recording Ongoing Behavior in Real Time

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 June 2009

A. Desmond Poole
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Belfast City Hospital, Northern Ireland
R. W. Sanson-Fisher
Affiliation:
Faculty of Medicine, University of Newcastle, New South Wales,
Ian Lowe
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, University of Western Australia

Extract

A number of problems associated with the use of the commonly employed interval and event recording procedures are discussed and it is suggested that these problems may be overcome by the use of real time recording techniques. An electronic system for recording ongoing behavior is described. The Data Acquisition in Real Time II (DART II) system consists of an open-format, microprocessor-controlled coding unit which permits the recording of the onset and offset of discrete behaviors as they occur in real time. It is completely portable, totally silent in operation, allows up to 60 discrete behavioral categories to be coded, provides comprehensive feedback to the user, and can store data almost indefinitely in a form which allows for direct transfer to computer for analysis. While the DART II system may be employed for interval or event recording, its use in a two-channel configuration to record the interactions between a target subject and several input persons is described. Advantages of the system are discussed.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © British Association for Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapies 1982

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Celhoffer, L., Boukydis, C., Minde, K. and Muir, E. (1977). The DCR-II event recorder: a portable high-speed digital cassette system with direct computer access. Behavior Research Methods and Instrumentation 9, 442446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Powell, J. and Rockinson, R. (1978). On the inability of interval time sampling to reflect frequency of occurrence data. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis 11, 531532.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sackett, G. P. (1978). Measurement in observational research. In Observing Behavior. Volume 2, Data Collection and Analysis Methods, Sackett, G. P. (Ed.), Baltimore: University Park Press.Google Scholar
Sackett, G. P., Stephenson, E. and Ruppenthal, G. G. (1973). Digital acquisition systems for observing behavior in laboratory and field settings. Behavior Research Methods and Instrumentation 5, 344348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sanson-Fisher, R. W., Poole, A. D., Small, G. A. and Fleming, I. R. (1979). Data acquisition in real time – an improved system for naturalistic observation. Behavior Therapy 10, 543554.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sidowski, J. B. (1977). Observation research: some instrumented systems for scoring and storing behavioral data. Behavior Research Methods and Instrumentation 9, 403404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stephenson, G. R. and Roberts, T. W. (1977). The SSR system: a general encoding system with computerized transcription. Behavior Research Methods and Instrumentation 9, 434441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Torgerson, L. (1977). Datamyte 900. Behavior Research Methods and Instrumentation 9, 405406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.