Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T03:22:14.469Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Acceptability of a brief training programme targeting attention and interpretation biases for threat in youth with a history of maltreatment

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 November 2019

Jennifer Y.F. Lau*
Affiliation:
Psychology Department, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King’s College London, De Crespigny Park, London SE5 8AF, UK
Narayan Prasad Sharma
Affiliation:
Central Department of Psychology, Tribhuvan University, Kathmandu, Nepal
Eleanor Bennett
Affiliation:
Psychology Department, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King’s College London, De Crespigny Park, London SE5 8AF, UK
Sandesh Dhakal
Affiliation:
Central Department of Psychology, Tribhuvan University, Kathmandu, Nepal
Ayesha Vaswani
Affiliation:
Psychology Department, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King’s College London, De Crespigny Park, London SE5 8AF, UK
Rakesh Pandey
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi-221 005, UP, India
Shanta Niraula
Affiliation:
Central Department of Psychology, Tribhuvan University, Kathmandu, Nepal
Veena Kumari
Affiliation:
Psychology Department, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King’s College London, De Crespigny Park, London SE5 8AF, UK Centre for Cognitive Neuroscience, College of Health and Life Sciences, Brunel University London, Uxbridge UB8 3PH, UK
*
*Corresponding author. Email: [email protected]

Abstract

Background:

Tendencies to attend to threatening cues in the environment and to interpret ambiguous situations with negative/hostile intent maintain and may even precipitate internalizing and externalizing problems in young people with a history of maltreatment. Challenging maladaptive information-processing styles using cognitive bias modification (CBM) training may reduce symptoms.

Aims:

To investigate the acceptability of CBM training in nine young people attending alternate education provision units in the UK, and 10 young people living in out-of-home care institutions in Nepal with a history of maltreatment.

Method:

CBM training consisted of five sessions of training over a 2-week period; each training session consisted of one module targeting attention biases and one module targeting interpretation biases for threat. A feedback form administered after training measured acceptability. Pre- and post-intervention measures of internalizing and externalizing symptoms were also taken.

Results:

Most young people (89%) found the training helpful and 84% found the training materials realistic. There were reductions in many symptom domains, but with individual variation. Although limited by the lack of a control condition, we established generalizability of acceptability across participants from two cultural settings.

Conclusions:

Replication of these findings in larger feasibility randomized controlled trials with measures of attention and interpretation bias before and after intervention, are needed to assess the potential of CBM in reducing anxiety symptoms and its capacity to engage targeted mechanisms.

Type
Brief Clinical Report
Copyright
© British Association for Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapies 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Contributed equally as first authors.

§

Contributed equally as senior authors.

References

Briggs-Gowan, M. J., Pollak, S. D., Grasso, D., Voss, J., Mian, N. D., Zobel, E., … & Pine, D. S. (2015). Attention bias and anxiety in young children exposed to family violence. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 56, 11941201.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dhakal, S., Niraula, S., Sharma, N. P., Sthapit, S., Bennett, E., Vaswani, A., … & Lau, J. Y. (2019). History of abuse and neglect and their associations with mental health in rescued child labourers in Nepal. The Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, [12 June 2019: 4867419853882]. doi: 10.1177/0004867419853882CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dodge, K. A., Pettit, G. S., Bates, J. E., & Valente, E. (1995). Social information-processing patterns partially mediate the effect of early physical abuse on later conduct problems. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 104, 632643.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Finkelhor, D., Hamby, S. L., Ormrod, R., & Turner, H. (2005). The Juvenile Victimization Questionnaire: reliability, validity, and national norms. Child Abuse and Neglect, 29, 383412. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2004.11.001CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lisk, S., Pile, V., Haller, S., Kumari, V. & Lau, J.Y. (2018). Multisession cognitive bias modification targeting multiple biases in adolescents with elevated social anxiety. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 42, 581597. doi: 10.1007/s10608-018-9912-yCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shackman, J. E., Shackman, A. J., & Pollak, S. D. (2007). Physical abuse amplifies attention to threat and increases anxiety in children. Emotion, 7, 838852. doi: 10.1037/1528-3542.7.4.838CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shahinfar, A., Fox, N. A., & Leavitt, L. A. (2000). Preschool children’s exposure to violence: relation of behavior problems to parent and child reports. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 70, 115125.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.