Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T00:07:12.698Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

21st Century Cognitive Behavioural Therapy for Anger: A Systematic Review of Research Design, Methodology and Outcome

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 February 2018

Ephrem Fernandez ,
Catia Malvaso ,
Andrew Day  and
Deepan Guharajan
Ephrem Fernandez*
Affiliation:
University of Texas at San Antonio – Psychology, San Antonio, Texas 78249, USA
Catia Malvaso
Affiliation:
University of Adelaide – Psychology, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
Andrew Day
Affiliation:
James Cook University, Townsville, Queensland, Australia
Deepan Guharajan
Affiliation:
University of Texas at San Antonio – Psychology, San Antonio, Texas 78249, USA
*
Correspondence to Ephrem Fernandez, University of Texas at San Antonio – Psychology, One UTSA Circle San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas 78249, USA. Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Background: Past reviews of cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) for anger have focused on outcome in specific subpopulations, with few questions posed about research design and methodology. Since the turn of the century, there has been a surge of methodologically varied studies awaiting systematic review. Aims: The basic aim was to review this recent literature in terms of trends and patterns in research design, operationalization of anger, and covariates such as social desirability bias (SDB). Also of interest was clinical outcome. Method: After successive culling, 42 relevant studies were retained. These were subjected to a rapid evidence assessment (REA) with special attention to design (ranked on the Scientific Methods Scale) measurement methodology (self-monitored behaviour, anger questionnaires, and others’ ratings), SDB assessment, and statistical versus clinical significance. Results: The randomized controlled trial characterized 60% of the studies, and the State Trait Anger Expression Inventory was the dominant measure of anger. All but one of the studies reported statistically significant outcome, and all but one of the 21 studies evaluating clinical significance laid claim to it. The one study with neither statistical nor clinical significance was the only one that had assessed and corrected for SDB. Conclusions: Measures remain relatively narrow in scope, but study designs have improved, and the outcomes suggest efficacy and clinical effectiveness. In conjunction with previous findings of an inverse relationship between anger and SDB, the results raise the possibility that the favourable picture of CBT for anger may need closer scrutiny with SDB and other methodological details in mind.

Keywords

cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT)rapid evidence assessment (REA)systematic reviewrandomized controlled trial (RCT)clinical significancesocial desirability bias (SDB)anger
Type
Empirically Grounded Clinical Interventions
Information
Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy , Volume 46 , Issue 4 , July 2018 , pp. 385 - 404
Copyright
Copyright © British Association for Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapies 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

An asterisk (*) before a reference denotes that it is listed in Table 1.Google Scholar
Beck, R. and Fernandez, F. (1998). Cognitive-behavioral therapy in the treatment of anger: a meta-analysis. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 22, 63–74.Google Scholar
Broom, J. (2016). Review: Barriers to physical activity in obese adults: a rapid evidence assessment. Journal of Research in Nursing, 21, 288–289.Google Scholar
Burns, J. W., Gerhart, J. I., Bruehl, S., Peterson, K. M., Smith, D. A., Porter, L. S. et al. (2015). Anger arousal and behavioral anger regulation in everyday life among patients with chronic low back pain: relationships to patient pain and function. Health Psychology, 34, 547–555.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Burton, E., Butler, G., Hodgkinson, J. and Marshall, S. (2007). Quick but not dirty: rapid evidence assessments (REAs) as a decision support tool in social policy. In Hogard, E., Ellis, R. and Warren, J. (eds), Community Safety: Innovation and Evaluation, pp. 50–62. Chester: Chester Academic Press.Google Scholar
*Cahill, S. P., Rauch, S. A., Hembree, E. A. and Foa, E. B. (2003). Effect of cognitive-behavioral treatments for PTSD on anger. Journal of Psychotherapy: An International Quarterly, 17, 113–131.Google Scholar
Chereji, S. V., Pintea, S. and David, D. (2012). The relationship of anger and cognitive distortions with violence in violent offenders population: a meta-analytic review. European Journal of Psychology Applied to Legal Context, 4, 1–98.Google Scholar
*Dahlen, E. R. and Deffenbacher, J. L. (2000). A partial component analysis of Beck's cognitive therapy for the treatment of general anger. Journal of Cognitive Psychotehrapy, 14, 77–95.Google Scholar
Day, A., Mohr, P., Howells, K., Gerace, A. and Lim, L. (2012). The role of empathy in anger arousal in violent offenders and university students. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 56, 599–613.Google Scholar
Day, A. and Vess, J. (2013). Targeting anger in forensic populations. In Fernandez, E. (ed), Treatments for Anger in Specific Populations: Theory, Application, and Outcome, pp. 158–175. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
*Deffenbacher, J. L., Filetti, L. B., Lynch, R. S., Dahlen, E. R. and Oetting, E. R. (2002). Cognitive-behavioral treatment of high anger drivers. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 40, 895–910.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
*Deffenbacher, J. L., Huff, M. E., Lynch, R. S., Oetting, E. R. and Salvatore, N. F. (2000). Characteristics and treatment of high-anger drivers. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 47, 5–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Delamater, R. J. and McNamara, J. R. (1987). Expression of anger: its relationship to assertion and social desirability among college women. Psychological Reports, 61, 131–134.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Del Vecchio, T. and O'Leary, K. D. (2004). Effectiveness of anger treatments for specific anger problems: a meta-analytic review. Clinical Psychology Review, 24, 15–34.Google Scholar
DiGiuseppe, R. and Tafrate, R. C. (2003). Anger treatment for adults: a meta-analytic review. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 10, 70–84.Google Scholar
Dutton, D. G. and Hemphill, K. J. (1992). Patterns of socially desirable responding among perpetrators and victims of wife assault. Violence and Victims, 7, 29–39.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Farrington, D. P., Gottfredson, D. C., Sharman, L. W. and Welsh, B. C. (2002). The Maryland scientific methods scale. In Sherman, L. W., Farrington, D. P., Welsh, B. C. and MacKenzie, D. L. (eds), Evidence-Based Crime Prevention, pp. 13–22. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
*Fernandez, E. and Beck, R. (2001). Cognitive-behavioral self-intervention versus self-monitoring of anger: effects on anger frequency, duration and intensity. Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy, 29, 345–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fernandez, E., Day, A. and Boyle, G. J. (2015). Measures of anger and hostility in adults. In Boyle, G. J., Saklofske, D. and Matthews, G. (eds), Measures of Personality and Social Psychological Constructs, pp. 74–100. London: Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fernandez, E. and Johnson, S. L. (2016). Anger in psychological disorders: prevalence, presentation, etiology and prognostic implications. Clinical Psychology Review, 46, 124–135.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
*Fernandez, E. and Scott, S. (2009). Anger treatment in chemically-depended inpatients: evaluation of phase effects and gender. Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy, 37, 431–447.Google Scholar
*Fuller, J. R., DiGiuseppe, R., O'Leary, S., Fountain, T. and Lang, C. (2010). An open trial of a comprehensive anger treatment program on an outpatient sample. Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy, 38, 485–490.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garrett, B., Taverner, T., Masinde, W., Gromala, D., Shaw, C. and Negraeff, M. (2014). A rapid evidence assessment of immersive virtual reality as an adjunct therapy in acute pain management in clinical practice. Clinical Journal of Pain, 30, 1089–1098.Google Scholar
*Goldman, D. B. and Wade, N. G. (2012). Comparison of forgiveness and anger-reduction group treatments: a randomized controlled trial. Psychotherapy Research, 22, 604–620.Google Scholar
*Gonzalez-Prendes, A. A., Hernandez Jozeforwicz-Simbeni, D. M. (2009). The effects of cognitive-behavioral therapy on trait anger and paranoid ideation. Research on Social Work Practice, 19, 686–693.Google Scholar
*Haddock, G., Barrowclough, C., Shaw, J. J., Dunn, G., Novaco, R.W. and Tarrier, N. (2009) Cognitive-behavioural therapy v. social activity therapy for people with psychosis and a history of violence: randomised controlled trial. British Journal of Psychiatry, 194, 152–157.Google Scholar
*Hagiliassis, N., Gulbenkoglu, H., Di Marco, M., Young, S. and Hudson, A. (2005). The Anger Management Project: a group intervention for anger in people with physical and multiple disabilities. Journal of Intellectual and Developmental Disability, 30, 86–96.Google Scholar
Hanson, K. and Wallace-Capretta, S. (2000). Predicting Recidivism Among Male Batterers. Canada: Public Works and Government Services.Google Scholar
*Hart, T., Vaccaro, M. J., Hays, C. and Maiuro, R. D. (2012). Anger self-management training for people with traumatic brain injury: a preliminary investigation. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 27, 113–122.Google Scholar
*Henwood, K., Browne, K. and Chou, S. (2016). A randomized controlled trial exploring the effects of brief anger management on community-based offenders in Malta. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 1–21.Google Scholar
Henwood, K. S., Chou, S. and Browne, K. D. (2015). A systematic review and meta-analysis on the effectiveness of CBT informed anger management. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 25, 280–292.Google Scholar
*Heseltine, K., Howells, K. and Day, A. (2010). Brief anger interventions with offenders may be ineffective: a replication and extension. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 48, 246–250.Google Scholar
Ho, B. P. V., Carter, M. and Stephenson, J. (2010). Anger management using a cognitive-behavioural approach for children with special education needs: a literature review and meta-analysis. International Journal of Disability, Development and Education, 57, 245–265.Google Scholar
Howells, K. and Day, A. (2003). Readiness for anger management: clinical and theoretical issues. Clinical Psychology Review, 23, 319–337.Google Scholar
*Howells, K., Day, A., Williamson, P., Bubner, S., Jauncey, S., Parker, A. and Heseltine, K. (2005). Brief anger management programs with offenders: outcomes and predictors of change. Journal of Forensic Psychiatry and Psychology, 16, 296–311.Google Scholar
*Howie, A. J. and Malouff, J. M. (2014). Effects of online cognitive treatment for problematic anger: a randomized controlled trial. Cognitive Behaviour Therapy, 43, 310–318.Google Scholar
*Hutchinson, G., Willner, P., Rose, J., Burke, I. and Bastick, T. (2017). CBT in a Caribbean context: a controlled trial of anger management in Trinidadian prisons. Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy, 45, 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
*Hyun, M., Chung, H. C., De Gagne, J. C. and Kang, H. S. (2014). The effect of cognitive-behavioral therapy on depression, anger, and self-control for Korean soldiers. Journal of Psychosocial Nursing and Mental Health Services, 52, 22–28.Google Scholar
Izawa, S. and Nomura, S. (2006). The relationship of hostility to health related behaviors, obesity, and hypertension in adolescence. Japanese Journal of Health Psychology, 19, 11–19.Google Scholar
Jacobson, N. S. and Truax, P. (1991). Clinical significance: a statistical approach to defining meaningful change in psychotherapy research. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 59, 12–19.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
*Karahan, T. F., Yalcin, B. M. and Erbas, M. M. (2014). The beliefs, attitudes and views of university students about anger and the effects of cognitive behavioral therapy-oriented anger control and anxiety management programs on their anger management. Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice, 14, 2071–2082.Google Scholar
Kirchner, T. R. and Shiffman, S. (2013). Ecological momentary assessment. In MacKillop, J., and de Wit, H. (eds), The Wiley-Blackwell Handbook of Addiction Psychopharmacology, pp. 541–565. Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
*Korman, L., Collins, J., Littman-Sharp, N., Skinner, W., McMain, S. and Mercado, V. (2008). Randomized control trial of an integrated therapy for comorbid anger and gambling. Psychotherapy Research, 18, 454–465.Google Scholar
*Kubiak, S.P., Kim, W. J., Fedock, G. and Bybee, D. (2015). Testing a violence-prevention intervention for incarcerated women using a randomized control trial. Research on Social Work Practice, 25, 334–348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
*Lindsay, W. R., Allan, R., Parry, C., Macleod, F., Cottrell, J., Overend, H., and Smith, A. H. W. (2004). Anger and aggression in people with intellectual disabilities. Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, 11, 255–264.Google Scholar
*Medd, J. and Tate, R. L. (2000). Evaluation of an anger management therapy programme following acquired brain injury: a preliminary study. Nueropsychological Rehabilitation, 10, 185–201.Google Scholar
*Morland, L. A., Greene, C. J., Rosen, C. S., Foy, D., Reilly, P., Shore, J., He, Q. and Freuh, C. (2010). Telemedicine for anger management therapy in a rural population of combat veterans with post-traumatic stress disorder: a randomized non-inferiority trial. Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, 71, 855–863.Google Scholar
*Naeem, F., Clarke, I. and Kingdon, D. (2009). A randomized controlled trial to assess an anger management group programme. the Cognitive Behaviour Therapist, 2, 20–31.Google Scholar
Nicoll, M., Beail, N. and Saxon, D. (2013). Cognitive behavioural treatment for anger in adults with intellectual disabilities: a systematic review and meta‐analysis. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 26, 47–62.Google Scholar
Novaco, R. W. (2003). The Novaco Anger Scale and Provocation Inventory (NAS-PI). Los Angeles, CA: Western Psychological Services.Google Scholar
Phelps, A. J., Varker, T., Metcalf, O. and Dell, L. (2017). What are effective psychological interventions for veterans with sleep disturbances? A rapid evidence assessment. Military Medicine, 182, e1541–1550.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Prochaska, J. O. and DiClemente, C. C. (1982). Transtheoretical therapy: toward a more integrative model of change. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research and Practice, 19, 276–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
*Resick, P. A., Galovski, T. E., O'Brien Uhlmansiek, M., Scher, C. D., Clum, G. A. and Young-Xu, Y. (2008). A randomized clinical trial to dismantle components of cognitive processing therapy for post-traumatic stress disorder in female victims of interpersonal violence. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 76, 243–258.Google Scholar
*Rose, J. L. (2013). A preliminary investigation into the influence of therapist experience on outcome of individual anger interventions. Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy, 41, 470–478.Google Scholar
*Rose, J. L., Dodd, L. and Rose, N. (2008). Individual cognitive behavioral intervention for anger. Journal of Mental Health Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 1, 97–108.Google Scholar
*Rose, J. L., Loftus, M., Flint, B. and Carey, L. (2005). Factors associated with the efficacy of a group intervention for anger in people with intellectual disabilities. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 44, 305–317.Google Scholar
*Rose, J. L., O'Brien, A. and Rose, D. (2009). Group and individual cognitive behavioural interventions for anger. Advances in Mental Health and Learning Disabilities, 3, 45–50.Google Scholar
*Shea, M. T., Lambert, J. and Reddy, M. K. (2013). A randomized pilot study of anger treatment for Iraq and Afghanistan veterans. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 51, 607–613.Google Scholar
Sherman, L. W., Farrington, D. P., Welsh, B. C. and MacKenzie, D. L. (2002). Evidence-Based Crime Prevention. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Sherman, L. W., Farrington, D. P., Welsh, B. C. and MacKenzie, D. L. (2006). Maryland Scientific Methods Scale: Evidence-Based Crime Prevention. London–New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
*Slavin-Spenny, O., Lumley, M. A., Thakur, E. R., Nevedal, D. C. and Hijazi, A. M. (2013). Effects of anger awareness and expression training versus relaxation training on headaches: a randomized trial. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 46, 181–192.Google Scholar
Smedslund, J. (1993). How shall the concept of anger be defined? Theory and Psychology, 3, 5–33.Google Scholar
*Son, J. and Choi, Y. (2010). The effect of an anger management program for family members of patients with alcohol use disorders. Archives of Psychiatric Nursing, 24, 38–45.Google Scholar
*Steffen, A. M. (2000). Anger management for dementia caregivers: a preliminary study using video and telephone interventions. Behavior Therapy, 31, 281–299.Google Scholar
Stone, A. A. and Shiffman, S. (1994). Ecological momentary assessment (EMA) in behavorial medicine. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 16, 199–202.Google Scholar
*Strom, T., Leskela, J., Possis, E., Thuras, P., Leuty, M.E., Doane, B.M., Wilder-Schaaf, K. and Rosenzweig, L. (2013). Cognitive-behavioral group treatment for driving-related anger, aggression, and risky driving in combat veterans: a pilot study. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 26, 405–408.Google Scholar
Sukhodolsky, D. G., Kassinove, H. and Gorman, B. S. (2004). Cognitive-behavioral therapy for anger in children and adolescents: a meta-analysis. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 9, 247–269.Google Scholar
*Tang, M. (2001). Clinical outcome and client satisfaction of an anger amangement group program. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 68, 228–236.Google Scholar
*Taylor, J. L., Novaco, R. W., Gillmer, B. T., Robertson, A. and Thorne, I. (2005). Individual cognitive-behavioural anger treatment for people with mild-borderline intellectual disabilities and histories of aggression: a controlled trial. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 44, 367–382.Google Scholar
Van de Mortel, T. F. (2008). Faking it: social desirability response bias in self-report research. Australian Journal of Advanced Nursing, 25, 40–48.Google Scholar
Varker, T., Forbes, D., Dell, L., Weston, A., Merlin, T., Hodson, S. and O'Donnell, M. (2015). Rapid evidence assessment: increasing the transparency of an emerging methodology. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 21, 1199–1204.Google Scholar
*Vassilopoulos, S. P., Brouzos, A., Moberly, N. J. and Tsiligiannis, G. (2015). Development and evaluation of a short anger management group for special education teachers: a preliminary study. International Journal of School and Educational Psychology, 3, 107–116.Google Scholar
*Walker, A. J., Nott, M. T., Doyle, M., Onus, M., McCarthy, K. and Baguley, I. J. (2010). Effectiveness of a group anger management programme after severe brain injury. Brain Injury, 24, 517–524.Google Scholar
Welte, J. W. and Russell, M. (1993). Influence of socially desirable responding in a study of stress and substance abuse. Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research, 17, 758–761.Google Scholar
Williams, J. E. (2010). Anger/hostility and cardiovascular disease. In Potegal, M., Stemmler, G. and Spielberger, C. (eds), International Handbook of Anger: Constituent and Concomitant Biological, Psychological and Social Processes, pp. 435–447. New York, NY: Springer Science and Business Media.Google Scholar
Willner, P., Jones, J., Tams, R. and Green, G. (2002). A randomized controlled trial of the efficacy of a cognitive-behavioural anger management group for clients with learning disabilities. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 15, 224–235.Google Scholar
*Willner, P., Rose, J., Jahonda, A., Stenfert Kroese, B., Felce, D., Cohen, D. et al. (2013a). Group-based cognitive-behavioural anger management for people with mild to moderate intellectual disabilities: cluster randomized controlled trial. British Journal of Psychiatry, 203, 288–296.Google Scholar
*Willner, P., Rose, J., Jahoda, A., Stenfert Kroese, B., MacMahon, P., Stimpson, A. et al. (2013b). A cluster randomized controlled trial of a manualised cognitive-behavioural anger management intervention delivered by supervised lay therapists to people with intellectual disabilities. Health Technology Assessment, 17.Google Scholar
*Yalcin, B. M., Unal, M., Pirdal, H. and Karahan, T. F. (2014). Effects of an anger management and stress control program on smoking cessation: a randomized controlled trial. Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine, 27, 645–660.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.