Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-07T20:17:38.615Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Use of Visual Prompts to Increase Kegel Exercise Performance in Pregnant Women: A Case Study

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 October 2014

Carole Elliott
Affiliation:
The University of Western Australia
Stephen Houghton
Affiliation:
The University of Western Australia
Shane Langsford
Affiliation:
The University of Western Australia
Get access

Extract

A multiple baseline research design utilising visual prompts was implemented with 7 women in varying stages of pregnancy (24 to 35 weeks) to increase their frequency of Kegel pelvic exercises. Following a baseline phase, in which participants self-recorded their rates of Kegel exercise, an intervention comprising visual prompts was introduced. A return to baseline phase was then implemented where the visual prompts were removed. Data were analysed in two ways. First, a Friedman one-way repeated measures analysis of variance revealed a significant increase in the frequency of Kegel exercises during intervention. When the intervention was removed, the frequency of Kegel exercises decreased, in some cases to a level below that established as the original baseline. Second, data were analysed for each participant using DMITSA 2.0, which revealed that, while all individuals experienced increases in Kegel exercising from baseline to treatment phase, only 3 of the 7 experienced significant increases. Similarly, while 6 of the 7 participants experienced reductions in frequency of exercises when the treatment phase concluded, in only one case was the reduction significant. These findings are also compared to recommended rates of Kegel exercise regimes.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s) 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Alberto, P.A., & Troutman, A.C. (1982). Stimulus control and shaping. Applied Behavior Analysis for Teachers, 8, 304317.Google Scholar
Barlow, D.H., Hayes, S.C., & Nelson, R.O. (1986). The scientist practitioner: Research and accountability in clinical and educational settings. Oxford: Pergamon.Google Scholar
Bourcier, A.P. (1994). Physical therapy for female pelvic floor disorders. Current Opinion in Obstetrics and Gynecology, 6, 331335.Google Scholar
Brubaker, L., & Kotarinos, R. (1993). Kegel or cut: Variations on his theme. Journal of Reproductive Medicine, 38, 672678.Google ScholarPubMed
Bump, R.C., Hurt, W., Fantl, J., & Wyman, W. (1991). Assessment of Kegel pelvic muscle exercise performance after brief verbal instruction. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 165, 322.Google Scholar
Chalker, R., & Whitmore, K. (1990). Overcoming bladder disorders. New York: Harper-Collins.Google Scholar
Chiarelli, P.E., Gressor, M., Kelly, E., Lee, K., Sundquist, K., & Wilton, L. (1994). Australian Women's Health Handbook (pp. 107110). NSW: Gore & Osment.Google Scholar
Crosbie, J., & Sharpley, C.F. (1991). DMITSA 2.0: A statistical program for analysing data from interrupted time-series. Melbourne: Monash University.Google Scholar
Davila, G.W. (1996). Vaginal prolapse: Management with nonsurgical techniques. Postgraduate Medicine, 99, 171185.Google Scholar
Dixon, R.S., Knott, T., Rowsell, H., Sheldon, L., & Moore, D.W. (1992). Prompts and posted feedback: In search of an effective method of litter control. Behaviour Change, 9, 27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elia, G., & Bergman, A. (1993). Pelvic muscle exercises: When do they work? Obstetrics and Gynecology, 81(2), 283286.Google Scholar
Houghton, S. (1993). Using verbal and visual prompts to control littering in high schools. Education Studies, 19, 247254.Google Scholar
Kegel, A. (1951). Physiologic therapy for urinary stress incontinence. Journal of the American Medical Association, 146, 915.Google Scholar
Kegel, A. (1956). Stress incontinence of urine in women: Physiologic treatment. Journal of the International College of Surgeons, 25, 487.Google Scholar
Kennedy, K.L., Steidle, C.P., & Letizia, T.M. (1995). Urinary incontinence: The basics. Ostomy/Wound Management, 41, 1634.Google Scholar
MacKenzie, F. (1994). Penguin guide to women's health: Puberty to menopause and beyond. Victoria: Viking.Google Scholar
Schneider, M., King, L., & Surwit, R. (1994). Kegel exercises and childhood incontinence: A new role for an old treatment. The Journal of Pediatrics, 124, 9192.Google Scholar
Stoppard, M. (1991). New pregnancy and birth. Victoria: Viking.Google Scholar
Wilhelmson, L., Sanne, H., Elmfeldt, D., Tibbin, B., Grinby, G., & Weddel, G. (1975). A controlled trial of physical training after myocardial infarction. Preventive Medicine, 4, 491508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, P., AlSamarrai, T., & Deakin, M. (1987). An objective assessment of physiotherapy for female genuine, stress incontinence. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 94, 575.Google Scholar