Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-4rdpn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-06T10:45:02.575Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Regionally Based Teams for the Treatment of Challenging Behaviour: A Three-year Outcome Study

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 October 2014

Alan Hudson ,
Patrick Wilken ,
Roland Jauernig  and
Gary Radler
Alan Hudson*
Affiliation:
Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology
Patrick Wilken
Affiliation:
Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology
Roland Jauernig
Affiliation:
Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology
Gary Radler
Affiliation:
Department of Health and Community Services, Victoria
*
Department of Psychology and Intellectual Disability Studies, RMIT, Bundoora VIC 3083, Australia
Get access

Abstract

In 1990, 13 regionally based Behaviour Intervention Support Teams (BISTs) were established in Victoria to assist agencies providing support to persons with an intellectual disability who exhibited challenging behaviour. A primary function of the BISTs was to conduct intensive interventions for clients with severe challenging behaviours. The outcomes of the interventions conducted by eight of these teams were monitored over the period from 1991 to 1993. During this time, a total of 134 such interventions were completed by the teams. Many outcome measures were used for each intervention. These included direct observational measures of the challenging behaviours, measures of skill acquisition by the clients, and satisfaction with the results by caregivers. It was concluded that the interventions resulted in a high rate of success (approximately 75%). Additionally, it was concluded that the use of regionally based specialist teams was an effective way of treating severe challenging behaviours that had previously proven difficult to manage.

Type
Research Article
Information
Behaviour Change , Volume 12 , Issue 4 , December 1995 , pp. 209 - 215
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s) 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Aman, M.G., Singh, M.N., Stewart, A.W., & Field, S.J. (1985). The Aberrant Behavior Checklist: A behavior rating scale for assessment of treatment effects. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 89, 485–491.Google Scholar
Ashman, A. (1990). Science and research: Basic and applied research in intellectual disability. Australia and New Zealand Journal of Developmental Disabilities, 16, 173–185.Google Scholar
Baxter, C. (1987). Professional services as support: Perceptions of parents. Australia and New Zealand Journal of Developmental Disabilities, 13, 243–253.Google Scholar
Donnellan, A.N., La Vigna, S.W., Zambito, J., & Thvedt, H. (1985). A time limited intensive intervention program model to support community placement for persons with severe behavior problems. Journal for the Association of Persons with Severe Handicaps, 10, 123–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dura, J.R., & Mulick, J.A. (1987). Behavior disorder teams: An efficient institutional strategy. Behavioral Residential Treatment, 2, 223–228.Google Scholar
Durand, M. (1990). Severe behaviour problems: A functional communication training approach. New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
Hudson, A. (1995, 09). The treatment of challenging behaviour. Keynote address at the Annual Conference of the Australian Society for the Study of Intellectual Disability, Melbourne.Google Scholar
Hudson, A.M., Jauernig, R., & Wilken, P. (1994, 12). Evaluation of the Behaviour Intervention Support Team Program: Summative report. Melbourne: Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology, Disability Program Evaluation Unit.Google Scholar
Hudson, A.M., Jauernig, R., Wilken, P., & Radler, G. (1995). Behavioural treatment of challenging behaviour: A cost-benefit analysis of a service delivery model. Behaviour Change, 12, 216–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kiresuk, T.J., & Sherman, R.E. (1968). Goal attainment scaling: A general method for evaluating comprehensive community mental health programs. Community Mental Health Journal, 4, 443–453.Google Scholar
La Vigna, G., & Donnellan, A. (1986). Alternatives to punishment: Solving behavior problems with non-aversive strategies. New York: Irvington.Google Scholar
Luiselli, J.K., Matson, J., & Singh, N. (Eds.). (1992). Assessment, analysis, and treatment of self injury. New York: Springer Verlag.Google Scholar
Raynes, N.V. (1988). Annotated directory of measures of environmental quality for use in residential services for people with mental handicap. Manchester: University of Manchester.Google Scholar
Reichle, H., & Wacker, D.P. (Eds.). (1993). Communication alternatives to challenging behavior: Integrating functional assessment and intervention strategies. Baltimore: Brookes.Google Scholar
Repp, A., & Singh, N. (Eds.). (1990). Perspectives on the use of nonaversive and aversive interventions for persons with developmental disabilities. New York: Sycamore.Google Scholar
Sheerenberger, R.C. (1981). Deinstitutionalization: Trends and difficulties. In Bruininks, R.H., Meyers, C.E., Sigford, B.B., & Lakin, K.C. (Eds.), Deinstitutionalization and community adjustment of mentally retarded people (pp. 3–13). Washington, DC: American Association on Mental Deficiency.Google Scholar
Sparrow, S.S., Balla, D.A., & Cicchetti, D.V. (1984). Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales: Interview edition, expanded form. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.Google Scholar