Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T00:50:07.638Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Noncontingent Application Versus Contingent Removal of Tactile Stimulation: Effects on Self-injury in a Young Boy with Multiple Disabilities

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 October 2014

Jeff Sigafoos  and
Donna Pennell
Jeff Sigafoos
Affiliation:
The University of Queensland
Donna Pennell
Affiliation:
The University of Queensland
Get access

Abstract

This study examined the effects of tactile stimulation on self-injurious behaviour (SIB) in a 10-year-old boy with developmental disabilities. SIB occurred at high rates during unstructured play, suggesting an automatic reinforcement, sensory stimulation function. Noncontingent application of an alternative source of tactile stimulation produced only modest reductions in SIB, but contingent removal of the objects used to obtain tactile stimulation produced clinically significant reductions.

Type
Research Article
Information
Behaviour Change , Volume 12 , Issue 3 , September 1995 , pp. 139 - 143
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s) 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Carr, E.G. (1977). The motivation of self-injurious behavior: A review of some hypotheses. Psychological Bulletin, 84, 800–816.Google Scholar
Carr, E.G., & Durand, V.M. (1985). Reducing behavior problems through functional communication training. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 18, 111–126.Google Scholar
Durand, V.M. (1994). Problem behavior as communication. Behaviour Change, 10, 197–207.Google Scholar
Engelmann, S., & Colvin, G.T. (1983). Generalized compliance training. Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.Google Scholar
Favell, J.E., McGimsey, J.F., Schell, R.M. (1982). Treatment of self-injury by providing alternate sensory activities. Analysis and Intervention in Developmental Disabilities, 2, 83–104.Google Scholar
Harrop, A., & Daniels, M. (1986). Methods of time sampling: A reappraisal of momentary time sampling and partial interval recording. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 19, 73–77.Google Scholar
Iwata, B.A., Dorsey, M.F., Slifer, K.J., Bauman, K.E., & Richman, G.S. (1982). Toward a functional analysis of self-injury. Analysis and Intervention in Developmental Disabilities, 2, 3–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iwata, B.A., Pace, G.M., Dorsey, M.F., Zarcone, J.R., Vollmer, T.R., Smith, R.G., Rodgers, T.A., Lerman, D.C., Shore, B.A., Mazaleski, J.L., Goh, H.L., Cowdery, G.E., Kalsher, M.J., McCosh, K.C., & Willis, K.D. (1994). The functions of self-injurious behavior: An experimental-epidemiological analysis. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 27, 215–240.Google Scholar
Jones, R.S.P. (1991). Reducing inappropriate behaviour using nonaversive procedures: Evaluating differential reinforcement schedules. In Remington, B. (Ed.), The challenge of severe mental handicap: A behaviour analytic approach (pp. 47–69). Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
Meador, D.M., & Osborn, R.G. (1992). Prevalence of severe behavior disorders in persons with mental retardation and treatment procedures used in community and institutional settings. Behavioral Residential Treatment, 7, 299–314.Google Scholar
Repp, A. (1994). Comments on functional analysis procedures for school-based behavior problems. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 27, 409–411.Google Scholar
Repp, A., Felce, D., & Barton, L. (1988). Basing the treatment of stereotypic and self-injurious behaviors on hypotheses of their causes. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 21, 281–289.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Repp, A., & Karsh, K.G. (1994). Hypothesis-based interventions for tantrum behaviors of persons with developmental disabilities in school settings. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 27, 21–31.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rincover, A., & Devany, J. (1982). The application of sensory extinction procedures to self-injury. Analysis and Intervention in Developmental Disabilities, 2, 67–81.Google Scholar