Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T15:18:07.830Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Diagnostic Interview Schedule for Children, Adolescents, and Parents: Initial Reliability and Validity Data

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 February 2012

Sally Johnson
Affiliation:
Griffith University
Paula M. Barrett*
Affiliation:
Griffith University
Mark R. Dadds
Affiliation:
Griffith University
Tara Fox
Affiliation:
Griffith University
Alison Shortt
Affiliation:
Griffith University
*
*Address for correspondence: Dr Paula M. Barrett, School of Applied Psychology, Griffith University Gold Coast Campus, PMB 50 Gold Coast Mail Centre, QLD 9726, Australia. Email: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

This study evaluated the psychometric properties of the Diagnostic Interview Schedule for Children, Adolescents and Parents (DISCAP; Holland & Dadds, 1995), for DSM-IV anxiety disorders in children and adolescents. Two studies were conducted to examine the reliability and validity of the DISCAP. In the first study, the DISCAP and the Youth Self Report (YSR; Achenbach, 1991c) were administered to 120 nonclinical adolescents aged 12 through to 14 years. In the second study, the DISCAP and Child Behaviour Checklist (CBCL; Achenbach, 1991b) were administered to parents of 57 clinical children and adolescents aged 6 through to 16 years. Inter-rater reliability data was collected, and both concurrent and discriminant validity of the DISCAP were assessed against the YSR and CBCL. Inter-rater agreements for primary diagnoses were high, and rating scale data supported the concurrent and discriminant validity of the DISCAP diagnoses. Results suggest that the DISCAP can be used to facilitate reliable and valid diagnoses of childhood anxiety disorders.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Achenbach, T.M. (1991a). Integrative guide for the 1991 CBCL/4-18, YSR, and TRF profiles. Burlington: University of Vermont, Department of Psychiatry.Google Scholar
Achenbach, T.M. (1991b). Manual for the child behaviour checklist/4-18 and 1991 profile. Burlington: University of Vermont, Department of Psychiatry.Google Scholar
Achenbach, T.M. (1991c). Manual for the youth selfreport form and 1991 profile. Burlington: University of Vermont, Department of Psychiatry.Google Scholar
Achenbach, T.M., Conners, K., Quay, H., Verhulst, F.C., & Howell, C.T. (1989). Replication of empirically derived syndromes as a basis for taxonomy of child/adolescent psychopathology. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 17, 299323.Google Scholar
American Psychiatric Association. (1987). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (3rd ed., rev.). Washington, DC: Author.Google Scholar
American Psychiatric Association. (1994). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.Google Scholar
Angold, A., Cox, A., Prendergast, M., Rutter, M., & Simonoff, E. (1995). The child and adolescent psychiatric assessment (CAPA). Psychological Medicine, 25, 739753.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bell-Dolan, B., Last, C.G., & Strauss, C.C. (1990). Subclinical anxiety: Symptoms of anxiety disorders in normal children. American Journal Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 29, 759765.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Campbell, M.A., & Rapee, R.M. (1996). Current issues in the assessment of anxiety in children & adolescents: A developmental perspective. Behaviour Change, 13, 185193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gutterman, E.M., O’Brien, J.D., & Young, G. (1987). Structured diagnostic interviews for children and adolescents: Current status and future directions. Journal of the American Academy of Child Adolescent Psychiatry, 26, 620630.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Holland, D., & Dadds, M. (1995). The diagnostic schedule for children, adolescents and parents. Brisbane: Griffith University Press.Google Scholar
Kaufman, J., Birmaher, B., Brent, D., Roa, U., Flynn, C., Moreci, P., Williamson, D., & Ryan, N. (1997). Schedule for Affective Disorders And Schizophrenia in School Age Children – Present and Lifetime Version (K-SADS-PL): Initial reliability and validity data. Journal of the American Academy of Child Adolescent Psychiatry, 36, 981988.Google Scholar
Kendall, P.C., & Flannery-Schroeder, E.C. (1998). Methodological issues in treatment research for anxiety disorders in youth. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 26, 2738.Google ScholarPubMed
Kendall, P.C., & Warman, M.J. (1996). Anxiety disorders in youth: Diagnostic consistency across DSMIII- R and DSM -IV. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 10, 453– 463.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mannuzza, S., Fryer, A.J., Martin. L.Y. (1989). Reliability of assessment: I. Diagnostic agreement. Archives of General Psychiatry, 46, 10931101.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ollendick, T.H., King, N.J., & Yule, W. (1994). International handbook of phobic and anxiety disorders in children and adolescents. New York. Plenum.Google Scholar
Rapee, R.M., Barrett, P.M., Dadds, M.R., & Evans, L. (1994). Reliability of the DSM–III -R childhood anxiety disorders using structured interview: Interrater and parent–child agreement. Journal of the American Academy of Child Adolescent Psychiatry, 33, 984992.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Silverman, W. (1994). Structured diagnostic interviews. In T.H. Ollendick, N.J. King, & W. Yule (Eds.), International handbook of phobic and anxiety disorders in children and adolescents (pp. 293315). New York: Plenum.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Silverman, W.K., & Albano, A.M. (1995). The Anxiety Disorders Interview Schedule for Children and Parents – DSM-IV version. New York: Graywind.Google Scholar
Silverman, W.K., & Nelles, W.B. (1988). The Anxiety Disorders Interview Schedule for Children. Journal of the American Academy of Child Adolescent Psychiatry, 27, 772778.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed