Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T15:07:54.743Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Development of Behaviour Therapy in Australia: Reply to Russo, Tarrier and Sakano

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 October 2014

Syd H. Lovibond*
Affiliation:
University of New South Wales
*
University of New South Wales, School of Psychology, P.O. Box 1, Kensington NSW 2033, Australia
Get access

Extract

It was with considerable interest that I read the comments on my paper (Lovibond, 1993) offered by our three international colleagues. It is at once apparent from the commentaries that the issues in clinical psychology to which I drew attention are in no way unique to Australia. Quite clearly, however, in Japan behaviour therapy (or CBT) has not yet reached that stage of development where the problems I posed become relevant. For this reason I shall concentrate mainly on the comments of Professors Russo and Tarrier. Each of the commentators, but particularly Dr. Russo, found points of agreement with my statement of the issues, but none expressed support for the program of action I suggested. Surprisingly however, none had alternative solutions to offer.

I believe the most important issue I raised was the threat to the primacy of the scientist-professional model in the education/training/practice of clinical psychologists. Professor Russo clearly shares my concerns here, but Professor Tarrier makes no mention of the scientist-professional model or the need to maintain links with the basic discipline of psychology. From the general tenor of his remarks, I gather that Professor Tarrier does not regard the fate of the scientist-professional model as a major issue, and indeed he seems quite satisfied with the status of clinical psychology in the UK. Interestingly however, the report of the Manpower Planning Advisory Group, which Professor Tarrier quotes at another point, suggests that in the UK “clinical psychologists' roles are seen as ambiguous by others, confused with the roles of other disciplines and further confused by the variety of ways in which psychology services are delivered and practised. The research also found poor promotion of clinical psychologists' contributions to services and an inappropriately low profile in view of the impact that clinical psychologists could be having on the effectiveness of services” (MPAG, 1990, p. 8).

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s) 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Blashfield, R.K., & Livesley, W.J. (1991). Metaphorical analysis of psychiatric classification as a psychological test. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 100, 262270.Google Scholar
Carson, R.C. (1991). Dilemmas in the pathway of the DSM-IV. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 100, 302307.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lovibond, S.H. (1993). The development of behaviour therapy in Australia. Behaviour Change, 10, 312.Google Scholar
Manpower Planning Advisory Group (MPAG) (1990). Clinical Psychology Project: Report. Stanmore, England: Dss Leaflets Unit.Google Scholar
Russo, D.C. (1993). The primacy of an independent behaviour therapy community in the evolution of clinical psychology. Behaviour Change, 10, 1315.Google Scholar
Sakano, Y. (1993). Behaviour therapy in Japan: Beyond the cultural impediments. Behaviour Change, 10, 1921.Google Scholar
Tarrier, N. (1993). Cognitive-behaviour therapy in the UK: Comments on Lovibond. Behaviour Change, 10, 1618.Google Scholar
Wolpe, J. (1958). Psychotherapy by reciprocal inhibition. Stanford: California Stanford University Press.Google Scholar