Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T00:34:08.162Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Assessment of Post-traumatic Stress Disorder with an Australian Vietnam Veteran Population: Preliminary Findings with Two New Instruments

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 October 2014

Mark Creamer  and
Darren Chaffer
Mark Creamer*
Affiliation:
University of Melbourne
Darren Chaffer
Affiliation:
University of Melbourne
*
Department of Psychology, University of Melbourne, Parkville VIC 3052, Australia. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

Preliminary data are provided on two new instruments in the field of traumatic stress, namely the Penn Inventory and the post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) module of the Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI). The Penn Inventory is a 26-item self-report scale developed for use with a range of trauma populations. The CIDI-PTSD is a draft module currently being trialed and eventually to be included in the full version of the CIDI interview. Participants comprised 30 Australian Vietnam combat veterans, who also completed the Impact of Event Scale and the Mississippi Scale for PTSD (M-PTSD). The Penn Inventory demonstrated good congruent validity and was comparable to the M-PTSD in diagnostic accuracy. Both scales tended to overdiagnose. The CIDI-PTSD performed disappointingly, showing relatively low sensitivity and specificity. Implications for the appropriate use of these instruments are discussed.

Type
Research Article
Information
Behaviour Change , Volume 12 , Issue 3 , September 1995 , pp. 145 - 150
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s) 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Allen, S. (1994). Psychological assessment of posttraumatic stress disorder. Psychiatric Clinics of North America, 17, 327–349.Google Scholar
American Psychiatric Association. (1980). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.Google Scholar
American Psychiatric Association. (1987). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (3rd ed., rev.). Washington, DC: Author.Google Scholar
Baldessarini, R., Finklestein, S., & Arana, G. (1983). The predictive power of diagnostic tests and the effect of prevalence of illness. Archives of General Psychiatry, 40, 569–573.Google Scholar
Beck, A.T., Rush, A.J., Shaw, B.F., & Emery, G. (1979). Cognitive Therapy of Depression. New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
Davidson, J., Smith, R., & Kudler, H. (1989). Validity and reliability of the DSM-III criteria for posttraumatic stress disorder: Experience with a structured interview. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 177, 336–41.Google Scholar
Hammarberg, M. (1992). Penn Inventory for posttraumatic stress disorder: Psychometric properties. Psychological Assessment, 4, 67–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horowitz, M., Wilner, N., & Alvarez, W. (1979). The Impact of Event Scale: A measure of subjective stress. Psychosomatic Medicine, 41, 209–218.Google Scholar
Keane, T., Caddell, J., & Taylor, K.L. (1988). Mississippi Scale for combat-related posttraumatic stress disorder: Three studies in reliability and validity. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 56, 85–90.Google Scholar
Kulka, R., Schlenger, W., Fairbank, J., Hough, R., Jordan, B., Marmer, C., & Weiss, D. (1990). Trauma and the Vietnam generation: Report of findings from the National Vietnam Veterans Readjustment Study. New York: Brunner/Mazel.Google Scholar
Litz, B., Penk, W., Gerardi, R., & Keane, T. (1992). Assessment of posttraumatic stress disorder. In Saigh, P. (Ed.), Posttraumatic stress disorder: A behavioral approach to assessment and treatment (pp. 50–84). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar
Neal, L., Busuttil, W., Rollins, J., Herepath, R., Strike, P., & Turnbull, G. (1994). Convergent validity of measures of posttraumatic stress disorder in a military and civilian population. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 7, 447–456.Google Scholar
Robins, L., Wing, J., Wittchen, H., & Helzer, J. (1988). The Composite International Diagnostic Interview: An epidemiologic instrument suitable for use in conjunction with different diagnostic systems and in different cultures. Archives of General Psychiatry, 45, 1069–1077.Google Scholar
World Health Organisation Research and Training Centre. (1993). Draft CIDI-PTSD Module: 19.03.93. (Available from WHO Research and Training Centre, 299 Forbes Street, Darlinghurst, NSW 2010, Australia)Google Scholar