Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-07T22:30:04.119Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Antecedents of Problem Behaviour of People with Intellectual Disability

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 October 2014

R. Don Tustin ,
Malcolm J. Bond  and
Paivi Forsaith
R. Don Tustin*
Affiliation:
Minda Inc. &, Flinders University
Malcolm J. Bond
Affiliation:
Minda Inc. &, Flinders University
Paivi Forsaith
Affiliation:
Minda Inc. &, Flinders University
*
PO Box 427, Glenelg (Adelaide) SA 5045, Australia
Get access

Extract

The study examined associations reported by carers between problem behaviour of 92 adults with intellectual disability and 169 antecedent events, which were either environmental situations or prior behaviours of the client. Factor analyses were used to identify groupings of antecedents, providing a basis for constructing 19 sets of antecedents of problem behaviours. Assessments were made of the psychometric properties of these sets of items or scales. Of the 19 scales, 18 were associated with an increased likelihood of problem behaviour, showing that carers reported that the problem behaviours of this sample occurred in a wide range of defined situations. The preliminary analysis suggests that the scales may be useful for inquiring more systematically about antecedents, for developing descriptions of situations where problems occur, and for identifying situations that warrant further analysis in individual cases.

Type
Research Article
Information
Behaviour Change , Volume 14 , Issue 3 , September 1997 , pp. 155 - 165
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s) 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Albin, R.W., & Horner, R. H. (1988). Generalization and precision. In Horner, R.H., Dunlap, G., & Koegel, R.L. (Eds.), Generalization and maintenance: Life-style changes in applied settings, (pp. 99–120). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.Google Scholar
Bailey, J.S., & Pyles, D.A.M. (1989). Behavioral diagnostics. In Cipani, E. (Ed.), The treatment of severe behavior disorder: Behavior analysis approaches (pp. 85–107). Washington, DC: American Association on Mental Retardation.Google Scholar
Bartak, L. (1978). Educational approaches. In Rutter, M. & Schopler, E. (Eds.), Autism: A reappraisal of concepts and treatment (pp. 423–438). New York: Plenum.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barton, L.E., & Repp, A.C. (1981). Naturalistic studies of institutionalised retarded persons: Relationship between stereotypic responding, secondary handicaps, and population density. Journal of Mental Deficiency Research, 25, 257–264.Google ScholarPubMed
Baumeister, A.A., & Forehand, R. (1970). Social facilitation of body rocking in severely retarded patients. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 26, 303–305.3.0.CO;2-7>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baumeister, A.A., & Forehand, R. (1971). Effects of the extinction of an instrumental response on stereotyped body rocking in severe retardates. The Psychological Record, 21, 235–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baumeister, A.A., MacLean, W.E., Kelly, J., & Kasari, C. (1980). Observational studies of retarded children with multiple stereotyped movements. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 8, 501–521.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baumeister, A.A., & Rollings, J.P. (1976). Self injurious behaviors. In Ellis, N.R. (Ed.), International Review of Research in Mental Retardation (Vol. 8, pp. 1–34). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Bijou, S.W., & Baer, D.M. (1961). Child development: Vol. 1. A systematic and empirical theory. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, F. (1991). Creative daily scheduling: A nonintrusive approach to challenging behaviors in community residences. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 16, 75–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brusca, R.M., Nieminen, G.S., Carter, R., & Repp, A.C. (1989). The relationship of staff contact and activity to the stereotypy of children with multiple disabilities. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 14, 127–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burke, M.M., Burke, D., & Forehand, R. (1985). Interpersonal antecedents of self-injurious behavior in retarded children. Education and Training of the Mentally Retarded, 20, 204–208.Google Scholar
Carmines, E.G., & Zeller, R.A. (1979). Reliability and validity assessment. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carr, E.G. (1994). Emerging themes in the functional analysis of problem behavior. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 27, 393–400.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Carr, E.G., & Durand, V.M. (1985). Reducing behavior problems through functional communication training. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 18, 111–126.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Carr, E.G., Newsom, C.D., & Binkoff, J.A. (1980). Escape as a factor in the aggressive behavior of two retarded children. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 13, 101–117.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cooper, L.J., & Harding, J. (1993). Extending functional analysis procedures to outpatient and classroom settings for children with mild disabilities. In Reichle, J. & Wacker, D.P. (Eds.), Communicative alternatives to challenging behavior: Integrating functional assessments and intervention strategies (pp. 41–62). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.Google Scholar
Dodge, K.A., McClaskey, C.L., & Feldman, E. (1985). Situational approach to the assessment of social competence in children. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 53, 344–353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dura, J.R., Mulick, J.A., & Myers, E.G. (1988). Prevalence of multiple problem behaviors in institutionalized non-ambulatory profoundly mentally retarded children. Behavioral Residential Treatment, 3, 239–246.Google Scholar
Durand, V.M., & Crimmins, D.B. (1988). Identifying the variables maintaining self-injurious behavior. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 18, 99–117.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Favell, J.E., McGimsey, J.F., & Schell, R.M. (1982). Treatment of self-injury by providing alternate sensory activities. Analysis and Intervention in Developmental Disabilities, 2, 83–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gardner, W.I., Cole, C.L., Davidson, D.P., & Karan, O.C. (1986). Reducing aggression in individuals with developmental disabilities: An expanded stimulus control, assessment, and intervention model. Education and Training of the Mentally Retarded, 21, 3–12.Google Scholar
Groden, G. (1989). A guide for conducting a comprehensive behavioral analysis of a target behavior. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 20, 37–49.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Guess, D.Benson, H.A., & Siegel-Causey, E. (1985). Concepts and issues related to choice-making and autonomy among persons with severe disabilities. Journal of the Association for Persons with a Severe Handicap, 10, 79–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guess, D., Helmstetter, E., Turnbull, H.R. III, & Knowlton, S. (1986). Use of aversive procedures with persons who are disabled: A historical review and critical analysis (TASH Monograph Series No 2). Seattle: Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps.Google Scholar
Halle, J.W., & Holt, B. (1991). Assessing stimulus control in natural settings: An analysis of stimuli that acquire control during training. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 24, 579–589.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Holmes, T.H., & Rahe, R.H. (1967). The social readjustment rating scale. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 11, 213–218.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Horner, R.H. (1980). The effects of an environmental ““enrichment”” program on the behavior of institutionalized profoundly retarded children. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 13, 473–491.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Horner, R.H. (1994). Functional assessment: Contributions and future directions. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 27, 401–404.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Iwata, B.A. (1994). Functional analysis methodology: Some closing comments. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 27, 413–418.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Iwata, B.A., Dorsey, M., Slifer, K., Bauman, K., & Richman, G. (1982). Toward a functional analysis of self-injury. Analysis and Intervention in Developmental Disabilities, 2, 3–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iwata, B.A., Vollmer, T.R., & Zarcone, J.R. (1990). The experimental (functional) analysis of behavior disorders: Methodology, applications, and limitations. In Repp, A.C. & Singh, N.N (Eds.), Perspectives on the use of nonaversive and aversive interventions for persons with developmental disabilities (pp. 301–330). Sycamore, IL: Sycamore.Google Scholar
Kaiser, H.F. (1960). The application of electronic computers to factor analysis. Education and Psychological Measurement, 20, 141–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaiser, H.F. (1970). A second generation Little Jiffy. Psychometrika, 35, 401–415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kennedy, C.H. (1994). Manipulating antecedent conditions to alter the stimulus control of problem behavior. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 27, 161–170.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kennedy, C.H., & Itkonen, T. (1993). Effects of setting events on the problem behaviors of students with severe disabilities. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 26, 321–327.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Landesman, S. (1987). The changing structure and function of institutions: A search for optimal group care environments. In Landesman, S., Vietze, P.M., & Begab, M.J. (Eds.), Living environments and mental retardation (pp. 79–126). Washington, DC: American Association on Mental Retardation.Google Scholar
Lautenschlager, G.J. (1989). A comparison of alternatives to conducting Monte Carlo analyses for determining parallel analysis criteria. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 24, 365–395.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
LaVigna, G.A., & Donnellan, A.M. (1986). Alternatives to punishment: Solving behavior problems with non-aversive strategies. New York: Irvington.Google Scholar
LaVigna, G.A., & Willis, T.J. (1993). Positive intervention for severe and challenging behavior. Los Angeles, CA: Institute for Applied Behavior Analysis.Google Scholar
LaVigna, G.W., Willis, T.J., & Donnellan, A.M. (1989). The role of positive programming in behavioral treatment. In Cipani, E. (Ed.), The treatment of severe behavior disorders: Behavior analysis approaches (pp. 59–84). Washington: American Association on Mental Retardation.Google Scholar
Lennox, D.B., & Miltenberger, R.G. (1989). Conducting a functional assessment of problem behaviour in applied settings. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 14, 304–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lennox, D.B., Miltenberger, R.G., Spengler, P., & Erfanian, N. (1988). Decelerative treatment practices with those people who have mental retardation: A review of five years of literature. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 92, 492–501.Google Scholar
Mace, F.C., Lalli, J.S., & Pinter Lalli, E. (1991). Functional analysis and treatment of aberrant behavior. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 12, 155–180.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
MacLean, W., & Baumeister, A.A. (1981). An environmental analysis of stereotyped behavior in a developmentally delayed child. Applied Research in Mental Retardation, 2, 257–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maurice, P., & Trudel, G. (1982). Self-injurious behavior prevalence and relationships to environmental events. In Hollis, J.H. & Meyers, C.E. (Eds.), Life-threatening behavior: Analysis and intervention (pp. 81–104). Washington: American Association on Mental Deficiency.Google Scholar
McAfee, J.K. (1987). Classroom density and the aggressive behavior of handicapped children. Education and Treatment of Children, 10, 134–145.Google Scholar
Meinhold, P.M., & Mulick, J.A. (1990). Counter-habilitative contingencies in institutions for people with mental retardation: Ecological and regulatory influences. Mental Retardation, 28, 67–75.Google ScholarPubMed
Meyer, L.H., & Evans, I.M. (1989). Nonaversive intervention for behavior problems: A manual for home and community. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.Google Scholar
Michael, J. (1982). Distinguishing between discriminative and motivational functions of stimuli. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 37, 149–155.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Michael, J. (1993). Establishing operations. The Behavior Analyst, 16, 191–206.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nunnally, J.C. (1978). Psychometric theory (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
O'Neill, R.E., Horner, R.H., Albin, R.W., Storey, K., & Sprague, J.R. (1990). Functional analysis of problem behavior: A practical assessment guide. Sycamore, IL: Sycamore.Google Scholar
Patterson, G.R. (1982). Coercive family processes. Eugene, OR: Castalia.Google Scholar
Repp, A.C., Felce, D. & Barton, L.E. (1988). Basing the treatment of stereotypic and self-abusive behaviors on hypotheses of their causes. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 21, 281–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Repp, A.C., Singh, N.N., Karsh, K.G., & Deitz, D.E.D. (1991). Ecobehavioral analysis of stereotypic and adaptive behaviors: Activities as setting events. Journal of Mental Deficiency Research, 35, 413–429.Google Scholar
Runco, M.A., Charlop, M.H., & Schreibman, L. (1986). The occurrence of autistic self-stimulation as a function of novel versus familiar settings, persons, and tasks. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 16, 31–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schopler, E., Brehn, S.S., Kingsbourne, M., & Reichler, R.J. (1971). Effect of treatment structure on development in autistic children. Archives of General Psychiatry, 24, 415–421.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schroeder, S.R., Kanoy, R.C., Mulick, J.A., Rojahn, J., Thios, S.J., Stevens, M., & Hawk, B. (1982). Environmental antecedents which affect management and maintenance of programs for self-injurious behavior. In Hollis, J.H. & Meyers, C.E. (Eds.), Life-threatening behavior: Analysis and intervention (pp. 105–159). Washington, DC: American Association on Mental Deficiency.Google Scholar
Schroeder, S.R., & MacLean, W. (1987). If it isn't one thing, it's another: Experimental analysis of covariation in behavior management data of severe behavior disturbances. In Landesman, S., Vietze, P.M., & Begab, M.J. (Eds.), Living environments and mental retardation (pp. 315–337). Washington, DC: American Association on Mental Retardation.Google Scholar
Singer, G.H.S., Singer, J., & Horner, R.H. (1987). Using pretask requests to increase the probability of compliance for students with severe disabilities. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 12, 287–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Singh, N.N., Deitz, D.E.D., Epstein, M.H., & Singh, J. (1991). Social behavior of students who are seriously emotionally disturbed: A quantitative analysis of intervention studies. Behavior Modification, 15, 74–94.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tustin, R.D. (1993). Functional analyses of challenging behaviours of two people with intellectual disability. Behaviour Change, 10, 39–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tustin, R.D. (1994). Functions of over-active behaviours: Multiple analyses for two people with intellectual disability. Australia and New Zealand Journal of Developmental Disabilities, 19, 233–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tustin, R.D., Kent, P.A., Haskell, S., & Bond, M.J. (1991). Measuring severity of challenging behaviours: A behaviour disorder scale. Australia and New Zealand Journal of Developmental Disabilities, 17, 285–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vyse, S., Mulick, J.A., & Thayer, B.M. (1984). An ecobehavioral assessment of a special education classroom. Applied Research in Mental Retardation, 5, 395–408.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Williams, R. (1991). Choices, communication, and control: A call for expanding them in the lives of people with severe disabilities. In Meyer, L.H., Peck, C.A., & Brown, L. (Eds.), Critical issues in the lives of people with severe disabilities (pp. 543–544). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.Google Scholar
Wing, L. (1971). Autistic children. London: Constable.Google Scholar
Winterling, V., Dunlap, G., & O'Neill, R.E. (1987). The influence of task variation on the aberrant behaviors of autistic students. Education and Treatment of Children, 10, 105–119.Google Scholar