Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T04:18:03.410Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A Randomised Clinical Trial of a Meridian-Based Intervention for Food Cravings With Six-Month Follow-Up

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 February 2012

Peta Stapleton*
Affiliation:
School of Medicine, Griffith University, Australia. [email protected]
Terri Sheldon
Affiliation:
The Lakeside Rooms, Robina, Australia.
Brett Porter
Affiliation:
The Lakeside Rooms, Robina, Australia.
Jennifer Whitty
Affiliation:
School of Medicine, Griffith University, Australia.
*
*Address for correspondence: Dr Peta Stapleton, Senior Lecturer, School of Medicine, Griffith University, Logan Campus QLD 4131, Australia.
Get access

Abstract

This randomised, clinical trial tested whether The Emotional Freedom Technique (EFT) reduced food cravings. This study involved 96 overweight or obese adults who were allocated to the EFT treatment or 4-week waitlist condition. Degree of food craving, perceived power of food, restraint capabilities and psychological symptoms were assessed pre- and post- a 4-week treatment program (mixed method ANOVA comparative analysis), and at 6-month follow-up (repeated measure ANOVA with group data collapsed). EFT was associated with a significantly greater improvement in food cravings, the subjective power of food and craving restraint than waitlist from pre- to immediately post-test (p < .05). Across collapsed groups, an improvement in food cravings and the subjective power of food after active EFT treatment was maintained at 6 months, and a delayed effect was seen for craving restraint. Although there was a significant reduction in measures of psychological distress immediately after treatment (p < .05), there was no between-group difference. These findings are consistent with the hypothesis that EFT can have an immediate effect on reducing food cravings and can result in maintaining reduced cravings over time.

Type
Standard Papers
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)