Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T03:27:25.416Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Out of the Rut: A Cognitive Behavioural Treatment Program for Driving-while-disqualified Offenders

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 October 2014

Leon Bakker ,
Tony Ward ,
Marilyn Cryer  and
Stephen M. Hudson
Leon Bakker
Affiliation:
Department of Corrections, University of Canterbury
Tony Ward*
Affiliation:
Department of Corrections, University of Canterbury
Marilyn Cryer
Affiliation:
Department of Corrections, University of Canterbury
Stephen M. Hudson
Affiliation:
Department of Corrections, University of Canterbury
*
Department of Psychology, University of Canterbury, Private Bag 4800, Christchurch, New Zealand. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access

Extract

Driving while disqualified represents a serious and recurrent social problem, with approximately 40% of convicted individuals reoffending. The high relapse (or recidivism) rates in this group are thought to be associated with compulsivity or addictive processes. In this paper we describe a cognitive-behavioural treatment program (relapse prevention) for offenders convicted of driving while disqualified. This program represents a significant innovation in the rehabilitation of persistent driving offenders, as in the past most intervention programs have focused on driver education and/or alcohol treatment. A major assumption of the relapse-prevention approach is that for many men their driving offences represent a maladaptive response to stressful events such as interpersonal conflict. Therefore, the primary treatment approach revolves around teaching individuals more effective ways to solve their interpersonal problems and to regulate negative affective states.

Type
Research Article
Information
Behaviour Change , Volume 14 , Issue 1 , March 1997 , pp. 29 - 38
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s) 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bailey, J.P.M. (1993). A study of the traffic and criminal conviction histories of disqualified drivers as at 1991 in New Zealand. Lower Hutt, NZ: Institute of Environmental Health and Forensic Sciences.Google Scholar
Bandura, A. (1977). Social learning theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Bakker, L., Ward, T., & Hudson, S.M. (1997). Evaluation of a cognitive behavioural treatment program for driving while disqualified offenders. Manuscript in preparation.Google Scholar
Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Braybrook, B., & Southey, P. (1991). Census of prison inmates. Wellington, NZ: Department of Justice.Google Scholar
Donovan, D.M. (1989). Driving while intoxicated: Different roads to and from the problem. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 16, 270–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donovan, D.M., & Marlatt, G.A. (1982). Personality sub-types among driving-while-intoxicated offenders: Relationship to drinking behavior and driving risk. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 50, 241–249.Google Scholar
Donovan, D.M., Marlatt, G.A., & Salzberg, P.M. (1983). Drinking behavior, personality factorsM and high-risk driving. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 44, 395–428.Google Scholar
Foon, A.E. (1988). The effectiveness of drinking-driving treatment programs: A critical review. The International Journal of the Addictions, 23, 151–174.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kinkade, P., Leone, M.C., & Wacker, T. (1992). Probation and the drunk driver: A cost of being “MADD”. Federal Probation, 56, 6–15.Google Scholar
Marlatt, G.A., Baer, J.S., Donovan, D.M., & Kivlahan, D.R. (1988). Addictive behaviours: Etiology and treatment. Annual Review of Psychology, 39, 223–252.Google Scholar
Marlatt, G.A., Curry, S., & Gordon, J.R. (1988). A longitudinal analysis of unaided smoking cessation. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 56, 715–720.Google Scholar
Marlatt, G.A., & Gordon, J.R. (Eds.). (1985). Relapse prevention: Maintenance strategies in the treatment of addictive behaviors. New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
Marlatt, G.A., & Gordon, J.R. (1991). Relapse prevention: Future directions. In Gossop, M. (Ed.), Relapse in addictive behaviour (pp. 278–291). Beckinham, Kent: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
Mirrlees-Black, C. (1994). Disqualification from driving: An effective penalty? (Research and Planning Unit Paper 74). London: Home Office.Google Scholar
Nichols, J.L., & Ross, H.L. (1989). The effectiveness of legal sanctions in dealing with drunk drivers. Surgeon General: workshop on drunk driving: Background paper, (p 93–112). Rockville MD: US Dept of Health & Human Services: Office of the Surgeon General.Google Scholar
Pithers, W.D., Marques, J.K., Gibat, C.C., & Marlatt, G.A. (1983). Relapse prevention with sexual aggressives: A self-control model of treatment and maintenance of change. In Greer, J.G. & Stuart, I.R. (Eds.), The sexual aggressor: Current perspectives on treatment (pp. 214–234). New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.Google Scholar
Scriven, T. (1993). Anger management: A treatment manual. Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
Spier, P., Norris, M., & Southey, P. (1993). Convictions and sentencing of offenders in New Zealand: 1982 to 1991. Wellington, NZ: Justice Department, Policy and Research Division.Google Scholar
Tsuang, M.T., Boor, M., & Flemming, J.A. (1985). Psychiatric aspects of traffic accidents. American Journal of Psychiatry, 142, 538–546.Google ScholarPubMed
Vingillis, E. (1983). Drinking drivers and alcoholics: Are they from the same population? In Smart, R.G., Glaser, F.B., Isreal, Y., Kalant, H., Popham, R.E., & Schimdt, W. (Eds.), Research advances in alcohol and drug problems (Vol. 7, pp. 299–342). New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
Waller, P.F. (1985). Licensing and other controls of the drinking driver. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 70(Suppl.), 150–160.Google Scholar
Ward, T., & Hudson, S.M. (1996). Relapse prevention: A critical analysis. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 8, 177–200Google Scholar
Wells-Parker, E., Bangert-Drowns, R., McMillen, R., & Williams, M. (1995). Final results from a meta-analysis of remedial interventions with drink/drive offenders. Addiction, 90, 907–926.Google Scholar
Wells-Parker, E., Cosby, P.L., & Landrum, J.W. (1986). A typology for drinking driving offenders: Methods for classification and policy implications. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 18, 443–453.Google Scholar
Wieczorek, W.F., & Miller, B.A. (1992). Preliminary typology designed for treatment matching of driving-while-intoxicated offenders. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 60, 757–765.Google Scholar
Wilson, L., Ward, T., & Bakker, L. (1996). The relapse process in disqualified drivers. Manuscript in prepararion.Google Scholar
Wilson, P. (1992). Principles and practice of relapse prevention. New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
Zylman, R. (1974). A critical evaluation of the literature on alcohol involvement in highway death. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 6, 163–204.Google Scholar