Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T00:49:00.672Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Maladaptive Beliefs and Suppression of Negative Autobiographical Memories

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 February 2012

James C. Broadbent  and
Reginald D.V. Nixon
James C. Broadbent
Affiliation:
Flinders University, Australia.
Reginald D.V. Nixon*
Affiliation:
Flinders University, Australia. [email protected]
*
*Address for correspondence: Reginald D. V. Nixon, School of Psychology, Flinders University, GPO Box 2100, Adelaide, SA 5001, Australia.
Get access

Abstract

This study sought to investigate whether an individual difference in beliefs regarding the importance of controlling intrusive thoughts influenced the effect of suppressing negative autobiographical memories. In Phase I of the study, 165 undergraduate students completed the control-subscale of the Interpretations of Intrusions Inventory (III-31). Students with scores in the top (strong beliefs) and bottom (weak beliefs) 30% of the III-31 were selected to participate in Phase II. In Phase II an equal number of students with these ‘strong’ and ‘weak’ beliefs (N = 60) were randomised to either a thought suppression or control condition. As expected, instructions to suppress resulted in a rebound effect; however, contrary to predictions, differences in beliefs regarding the importance of controlling intrusive thoughts did not influence thought suppression ability. The implications of the findings for understanding the influence of metacognition on thought suppression are discussed.

Type
Standard Papers
Information
Behaviour Change , Volume 24 , Issue 3 , 01 August 2007 , pp. 125 - 134
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)