Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-8bhkd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-02T15:58:10.617Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Function of Sexual Fantasies for Sexual Offenders: A Preliminary Model

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 February 2012

Dion Gee ,
Tony Ward  and
Lynne Eccleston
Dion Gee
Affiliation:
University of Melbourne, Australia
Tony Ward*
Affiliation:
University of Melbourne, Australia
Lynne Eccleston
Affiliation:
University of Melbourne, Australia
*
Address for correspondence: Professor Tony Ward, School of Psychology, Victoria University of Wellington, PO Box 600, Wellington, New Zealand. Email: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

Although the content of sexual fantasy has been extensively researched, very little contemporary research has investigated the function of sexual fantasy within the context of offending. In this study, a qualitative analysis was used to develop a descriptive model of the phenomena of sexual fantasy during the offence process. Twenty-four adult males convicted of sexual offences provided detailed retrospective descriptions of their thoughts, emotions and behaviours before, during and after their offences. A data-driven approach to model development (grounded theory) was undertaken to analyse the interview transcripts. A preliminary model was developed to elucidate the function of sexual fantasy in the process of sexual offending, as well as the physiological and psychological variables associated with it. The sexual fantasy function model (SFFM) comprises four categories that describe the various functions of sexual fantasy in the offence process. These categories are affect regulation, sexual arousal, coping, and modelling. The strengths of the SFFM are discussed and its clinical implications are reviewed. Finally, the limitations of the study are presented, and future research directions discussed.

Type
Articles
Information
Behaviour Change , Volume 20 , Issue 1 , 01 March 2003 , pp. 44 - 60
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2003

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)